Comparison of Emergent and Elective Surgeries of Endometriomas: Is Adnexal Torsion a Concern?

BACKGROUND: When a woman with an endometrioma presents with acute abdominal pain, it is unclear whether ovarian torsion should be suspected. OBJECTIVES: To compare patient characteristics, imaging results, and surgical management of endometriomas in elective versus emergent surgeries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women treated at our institution during the period 1990-2015 who presented with histologically verified endometrioma and who underwent either planned surgery or emergent surgery due to suspected adnexal torsion. RESULTS: Of 225 surgeries performed, 174 were elective and 51 emergent. Patients in the emergent group were significantly younger (33.9 ± 11.1 vs. 39.01 ± 10.9 years, P = 0.004). Abdominal pain was the main complaint of all the emergent surgery patients and the leading complaint in 21% of the elective surgery patients (P < 0.001), with right-sided predominance in both groups. Sonographic parameters were similar in both groups. Bilateral ovarian cysts were noted in 11.7% and 11.0% of emergent and elective patients, respectively (P = 0.87). Laboratory evaluation was notable for a higher white blood cell count and CA125 levels among emergent patients. All patients in the emergent group and 93% of patients in the elective group were managed laparoscopically. No cases of torsion were noted. The rate of intra-pelvic adhesions was similar in both groups (56.8% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Endometrioma may present with acute abdominal pain. However, adnexal torsion in these patients is rare. These cases can be managed using a minimally invasive approach, assuming an optimal surgical setting.

Comparison of 3 protocols for analgesia control after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Proper pain control after cesarean delivery is of high clinical importance to the recovery and relief of patients after surgical delivery. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare fixed time interval to on-demand regimens of nonopioid analgesics and to assess whether a protocol that is based on intravenous administration is superior to oral administration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial performed between April 2017 and May 2018. Patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive 1 of 3 pain relief protocols for the first 48 hours after surgery: (1) the fixed intravenous protocol included intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) 3 times daily with oral ibuprofen twice daily, (2) the fixed oral protocol included oral paracetamol 3 times daily with oral ibuprofen twice daily; if the patient requested additional analgesia, tramadol hydrochloride or dipyrone were given as rescue treatments, (3) the on-demand protocol included oral paracetamol or ibuprofen or dipyrone (based on visual analog scale). Pain intensity was measured and compared with the use of the visual analog scale (range, 0 ([no pain] to 10 [worst pain]). Total doses of pain relief analgesia and maternal and neonatal adverse effects were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study included 127 women who were assigned randomly to the intravenous protocol group (n=41), oral protocol group (n=43), and on-demand protocol group (n=43). There were no between group differences in maternal and pregnancy characteristics, cesarean delivery indications, or surgical technique. The average visual analog scale score was 6.2±0.8 in the intravenous group, 7.0±1.1 in the oral group, and 7.5±0.7 in the on-demand group, in the first 24 hours (P=.01) and 6.4±0.7, 6.8±0.9, and 7.4±0.7 for the total 48 hours, respectively (P<.001). Mean pain score reduction was higher in the intravenous protocol compared with the fixed oral protocol group (4.7±1.2 vs 4.0±1.4; P=.02). The median doses of pain relief analgesia in the intravenous group were 5 (interquartile range, 5-7), 6 in the oral group (interquartile range, 4-6), and 4 in the on-demand group (interquartile range, 3-6; P=.001) in the first 24 hours and 9 (interquartile range, 7-10), 9 (interquartile range, 7-10), and 7 (interquartile range, 4-9), respectively, for the total 48 hours (P<.001). There were no "between group" differences in neonatal birthweight or maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Administration of pain relief analgesia (ibuprofen and acetaminophen) in fixed time intervals (intravenous or oral) after cesarean delivery yielded reduced visual analog scale pain scores compared with an on-demand protocol, despite fewer pain relief drugs consumed in the on-demand group.

Single versus repeat doses of misoprostol for treatment of early pregnancy loss-a randomized clinical trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does repeat administration of misoprostol for early pregnancy loss increase the treatment success rate? SUMMARY ANSWER: Repeat administration of misoprostol does not increase the treatment success rate, and is associated with more analgesics use. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Misoprostol reduces the need for surgical evacuation and shortens the time to complete expulsion in patients with early pregnancy loss. However, the impact of repeat doses of misoprostol is not clear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in a single tertiary hospital, recruiting women with early pregnancy loss (<12 weeks), seeking medical treatment, between August 2015 and June 2016. A sample size of 160 patients was sufficient to detect a 30% decrease in treatment success. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants received 800 µg of misoprostol vaginally on Day 1, and were then randomly assigned into two groups: Patients in the single-dose group were evaluated on Day 8. Patients in the repeat-dose group were evaluated on Day 4, when they were given a repeat dose if required, and scheduled for re-evaluation on Day 8. If complete expulsion was not achieved on Day 8 (endometrial thickness >15 mm or the presence of gestational sac on transvaginal sonography), participants underwent surgical evacuation. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as no need for surgical intervention up to Day 8. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Final analysis included 87 participants in the single-dose group and 84 participants in the repeat-dose group, out of whom 41 (48.8%) received a second dose. Treatment succeeded in 67 (77%) patients in the single-dose group and 64 (76%) patients in the repeat-dose group (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.16; P = 0.89). Patients in the repeat-dose group reported more use of over the counter analgesics (82.1% versus 69.0%, P = 0.04). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was not blinded and our definition of complete expulsion may be debated. Follow-up time was not equal in all participants, since some had a complete expulsion on Day 4 and some underwent emergent D&C before Day 8. This, however, should not affect the primary outcome. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results suggest that a single-dose protocol is superior to a repeat-dose protocol due to a comparable success rate and more favorable outcomes regarding the need for analgesic drugs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): We did not receive funding for this study and we declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515604). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 2 August 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 19 August 2015.

Endothelial function in children with a history of henoch schonlein purpura.

BACKGROUND: Although Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in children, the long term effect of HSP on endothelial function is still not clear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long term effect of HSP on endothelial function in children and adolescents. METHODS: This research was an observational prospective study. The study group comprised of 19 children diagnosed with HSP. The minimum interval between the diagnosis with HSP and endothelial testing was 5 months. Endothelial function evaluation was assessed by a noninvasive technology named peripheral arterial tonometry, using an EndoPAT™ device. This method measures blood flow in the limb, in response to arterial occlusion, and calculates a Reactive Hyperemic Index (RHI) as an index of endothelial function. RHI values of the study group were compared to those of a known control group. RESULTS: Nineteen children and adolescents with HSP underwent endothelial function studies. Endothelial function was compared to that of a known control group comprising of 23 healthy children and adolescents. The two groups had similar characteristics, including age, male to female ratio, height, weight and BMI. Mean RHI was 1.81 in the study group, and 1.87 in the control group (p = 0.18). Linear regression of the study group, showed a positive correlation between the time interval from HSP diagnosis to participation in the study, and between the RHI value (r = 0.542, p = 0.016). RHI levels were significantly higher in patients who had endothelial function measured more than 6 years since the diagnosis of HSP compared with those patients with less than 6 years follow up (1.98 + 0.74 vs. 1.38 ± 0.43 P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that HSP causes short term endothelial dysfunction that improves with time.