Gender norms and family planning amongst pastoralists in Kenya: a qualitative study in Wajir and Mandera.

There is growing recognition among global health practitioners of the importance of rights-based family planning (FP) programming that addresses inequities. Despite Kenya achieving its national FP target, inequities in access and use of modern FP remain, especially amongst marginalised nomadic and semi-nomadic pastoralist communities. Few studies explore norms affecting FP practices amongst nomadic and semi-nomadic pastoralists and how these can influence social and behaviour change (SBC) interventions. We carried out 48 in-depth interviews and 16 focus group discussions with women and men from pastoralist communities in North Eastern Kenya in November 2018. Data were analysed thematically. Results from focus groups and interviews confirmed themes, while allowing differences between the qualitative approaches to emerge. We found that large family size was a descriptive and injunctive norm in both nomadic and semi-nomadic communities. The desire for around 10 children was sustained by religious beliefs and pastoralist ways of living. Despite a desire for large families, maintaining child spacing was encouraged and practised through breastfeeding and sexual abstinence. Most participants viewed modern FP negatively and as something used by "others". However, it was acceptable in order to prevent severe negative health outcomes. Future FP research to inform interventions should continue to consider community fertility preferences and the rationale for these, including norms, religion and power dynamics. Targeted qualitative social norms research could inform multi-component SBC interventions in this context.

Unlocking the potential for engaging men to improve reproductive, maternal, and neonatal health in Karnali Province, Nepal.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) often experience early childbearing and have poor utilization of reproductive, maternal, and neonatal health (RMNH) services in Nepal. Involving men in such services has been increasingly recognized globally to improve gender-equitable reproductive health behaviour in husbands. This qualitative study assessed the implementation of Healthy Transitions' male engagement interventions in Karnali Province, Nepal which were implemented to improve gender-equitable attitudes, and supportive RMNH care-seeking behaviors among the husbands of young women. METHODS: We conducted a summative qualitative study that included in-depth interviews with 12 AGYW as primary beneficiaries and their husbands (N = 12) and in-laws (N = 8). In addition, key informant interviews were conducted with health workers (N = 8), local government representatives (N = 4), members of Health Facility Operation and Management Committee (N = 8) and project implementers (N = 12). Due to COVID-19-related travel restrictions and lockdowns, all interviews were conducted via phone calls and online consultation. Data were analyzed using multistage coding and thematic content analysis. RESULTS: AGYW, their husbands, in-laws and health workers were receptive to the Healthy transitions' male engagement initiatives. They perceived that the project contributed a momentum to facilitate men's gender-responsive behaviour. Many participants reported that male engagement interventions, including home visits, community dialogues, and social events improved husbands' support for their wives during menstruation, pregnancy, and childbirth. The activities also facilitated spousal communication and improved the couple's decision-making for family planning use. Women reported that improved support from their husbands increased their self-confidence. CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the role of male engagement strategies to improve RMNH in a context where inequitable gender norms and roles are highly prevalent. Our findings highlight the potential to improve RMNH by addressing barriers to male engagement.

Fostering gender equality and reproductive and sexual health among adolescents: results from a quasi-experimental study in Northern Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the Gender Roles, Equality and Transformations (GREAT) intervention: a narrative-based, resource-light, life-stage tailored intervention package designed to promote gender-equitable attitudes and behaviours, and improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV) outcomes among adolescents and their communities. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional evaluation study, using propensity score matching combined with difference-in-difference estimation. SETTING: Two postconflict communities in Lira and Amuru districts in Northern Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: Male and female unmarried adolescents (10-14 years, 15-19 years), married adolescents (15-19 years) and adults (over the age of 19 years) were selected using a stratified, two-stage cluster sample of primary and secondary schools and households (baseline: n=2464, endline: n=2449). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Inequitable gender attitudes and behaviours; GBV; and SRH knowledge and behaviours. RESULTS: Statistically significant intervention effects were seen across all three outcomes-gender equity, GBV and SRH-among older and newly married adolescents and adults. Among older adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: inequitable gender attitudes scale score: -4.2 points ((95% CI -7.1 to -1.4), p<0.05); Inequitable household roles scale score: -11.8 ((95% CI -15.6to -7.9), p<0.05); Inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: -1.9 ((95% CI -5.0 to -0.2), p<0.05); per cent of boys who sexually assaulted a girl in past 3 months: -7.7 ((95% CI -13.1 to -2.3), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: -10.1 ((95% CI -12.9 to -7.3), p<0.05). Among married adolescents, intervention effects include shifts on: Inequitable household roles scale score: -6.5 ((95% CI -10.8 to -2.2), p<0.05); inequitable attitudes towards GBV scale: -4.7 ((95% CI -9.8 to -0.3), p<0.05); per cent who reacted violently to their partner: -15.7 ((95% CI -27.1 to -4.4), p<0.05); inequitable SRH attitudes scale: -12.9 ((95% CI -17.3 to -8.5), p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The GREAT intervention model demonstrates the promise of a resource-light, life-stage tailored programme that employs culturally appropriate, participatory and narrative-based techniques to advance gender equity and adolescent health. This type of programming contributes towards reductions in GBV and improved adolescent SRH outcomes.

'If she gets married when she is young, she will give birth to many kids': a qualitative study of child marriage practices amongst nomadic pastoralist communities in Kenya.

Child marriage is associated with adverse health and social outcomes for women and girls. Among pastoralists in Kenya, child marriage is believed to be higher compared to the national average. This paper explores how social norms and contextual factors sustain child marriage in communities living in conflict-affected North Eastern Kenya. In-depth interviews were carried out with nomadic and semi-nomadic women and men of reproductive age in Wajir and Mandera counties. Participants were purposively sampled across a range of age groups and community types. Interviews were analysed thematically and guided by a social norms approach. We found changes in the way young couples meet and evidence for negative perceptions of child marriage due to its impact on the girls' reproductive health and gender inequality. Despite this, child marriage was common amongst nomadic and semi-nomadic women. Two overarching themes explained child marriage practices: 1) gender norms, and 2) desire for large family size. Our findings complement the global literature, while contributing perspectives of pastoralist groups. Contextual factors of poverty, traditional pastoral lifestyles and limited formal education opportunities for girls, supported large family norms and gender norms that encouraged and sustained child marriage.

Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no studies exist on the influence of nomadic pastoralist women's networks on their reproductive and sexual health (RSH), including uptake of modern family planning (FP). METHODS: Using name generator questions, we carried out qualitative egocentric social network analysis (SNA) to explore the networks of four women. Networks were analyzed in R, visuals created in Visone and a framework approach used for the qualitative data. RESULTS: Women named 10-12 individuals. Husbands were key in RSH decisions and never supported modern FP use. Women were unsure who supported their use of modern FP and we found evidence for a norm against it within their networks. CONCLUSIONS: Egocentric SNA proves valuable to exploring RSH reference groups, particularly where there exists little prior research. Pastoralist women's networks likely change as a result of migration and conflict; however, husbands make RSH decisions and mothers and female neighbors provide key support in broader RSH issues. Interventions to increase awareness of modern FP should engage with women's wider networks.

Few studies have asked nomadic women in Kenya to name the important individuals in their lives when it comes to making reproductive and sexual health decisions, including their use of family planning. These important individuals are described as a woman's "network". We used a survey and open-ended interview format to identify the individuals in four nomadic women's networks ("social network analysis"). Data was analysed in R and we created a visual map of these networks. Women named 10­12 individuals. Women's husbands made reproductive health decisions and did not approve of modern family planning use. Apart from their husbands, women did not know who in their network approved of their use of family planning. Female neighbors and mothers provided important support to women. Interventions to increase awareness of modern FP should engage with everyone in a woman's network.

Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC?

Meeting the reproductive health needs of women in post-conflict settings is a global health priority. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, social norms perpetuate gender-based violence and contribute to low contraceptive use and high fertility. The Masculinité, Famille, et Foi (MFF) intervention is working with communities in Kinshasa to create normative environments supportive of modern contraception access and use. Our analysis uses survey data collected from 900 men and women in 17 community groups prior to the MFF intervention. We aimed to measure the extent to which social norms influence intentions to use modern contraception. Using multiple items to assess social norms and reference groups related to family planning and gender equity, we identified four distinct social norms constructs through factor analysis. Through structural equation modeling, we found that social norms influence intentions to use modern contraception overall, but that normative influence varies by gender.