Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Saudi Med ; 42(5): 309-318, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36252145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The introduction of biological treatments has revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, there are no clear indications for optimal monitoring intervals during treatment. OBJECTIVES: Collect and analyze laboratory evaluation data from patients receiving biological therapy to provide a better understanding of the need for laboratory investigations before and during treatment with biological agents, and to analyze adverse events and other factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical records of patients attending the dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology clinics from June 2014 to June 2019. The laboratory parameters of patients who have received one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) were collected starting at baseline and up to at least one year from treatment initiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The time points at which patients developed significantly abnormal laboratory results during treatment with one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors. SAMPLE SIZE: 250 patients RESULTS: Most patients were treated with adalimumab (38.4%); a similar proportion (38%) with infliximab, whereas only 23.6% were treated with etanercept. The majority of the significant abnormal laboratory results occurred at baseline, 3-6 and 9-12 months. Most abnormalities were among patients using infliximab, followed by etanercept, and then adalimumab. The median number of laboratory abnormalities for dermatology patients was significantly lower than that for gastroenterology patients (P<.001), and for rheumatology patients (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Because dermatology patients showed a lower median number of laboratory abnormalities than patients treated by other specialties in our study, we believe that dermatology patients require less frequent laboratory monitoring. Therefore, we recommend laboratory evaluation at baseline, after 3-6 months, 1 year from the beginning of treatment, and annually thereafter for patients using TNF-alpha inhibitor agents. However, more frequent testing might be warranted according to patient comorbidities, concomitant medications, and physician judgment. LIMITATIONS: Single center and retrospective design. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Psoriasis , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Humans , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Infliximab/adverse effects , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects
2.
Biologics ; 14: 127-129, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33204064

ABSTRACT

Adalimumab is a fully human, recombinant, IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). It has been established that adalimumab can cross the placenta and can be detected in the fetal circulation for up to 6 months postpartum. However, clinical studies have failed to show any consistent or specific adverse fetal outcomes from maternal exposure to adalimumab during pregnancy. In our report, we present a case of fetal acrania (exencephaly) in the setting of a pregnant female taking adalimumab prior to and during pregnancy. Exencephaly is a neural tube defect (NTD) that results from failure of closure of the neural fold. It is true that there were other risk factors that might have contributed to our patient's unfortunate outcome. For example, she did not take folic acid supplementation prior to or during her pregnancy. Nonetheless, studies have shown that folic acid deficiency alone is not sufficient to lead to the development of NTDs. Our patient's exposure to adalimumab during her pregnancy might have added to the risk in her situation. Our report aims to inform clinicians of that possible risk and to stimulate them to report any similar outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...