Novel Once-Weekly Basal Insulin Fc Achieved Similar Glycemic Control With a Safety Profile Comparable to Insulin Degludec in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Basal Insulin Fc (BIF; insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in 265 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple daily injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, patients with T1D were randomized (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to a fasting glucose level of 80-100 mg/dL. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Secondary end points included percent time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) fasting glucose (FG) level, and rate of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, patients receiving BIF had noninferior HbA1c change from baseline versus those receiving degludec, with a statistically significant treatment difference of 0.17% (90% CI 0.01, 0.32; P = 0.07) favoring the comparator. Percent TIR was similar for patients in the BIF (56.1%) and degludec (58.9%; P = 0.112) groups at week 26. FG values were significantly higher for patients receiving BIF (158.8 mg/dL) versus degludec (143.2 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Rates of CGM-derived hypoglycemia were not statistically significantly different for BIF and degludec over 24 h for level 1 (P = 0.960) or level 2 (P = 0.517) hypoglycemia during the treatment period. Occurrence of serious adverse events was similar between the BIF and degludec groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly BIF demonstrated noninferior glycemic control to once-daily degludec (treatment difference: 0.17% favoring degludec) and no difference in hypoglycemia or other safety findings in patients with T1D.

A 96-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing bexagliflozin to glimepiride as an adjunct to metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults.

AIM: To compare the effects of bexagliflozin tablets 20 mg, with those of optimally titrated glimepiride when used to treat adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by metformin. METHODS: Adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 426) taking metformin, and with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level between 53 and 91 mmol/mol [7.0% and 10.5%], were randomized to receive bexagliflozin tablets 20 mg or titrated glimepiride. The primary endpoint was the intergroup difference in the change from baseline to Week 60 in percent HbA1c. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in body mass and systolic blood pressure (SBP), and proportion of subjects experiencing severe or documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: The intergroup difference in percent HbA1c (bexagliflozin minus glimepiride) from baseline to Week 60 was -0.55 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.30, 1.20)-[-0.05% (-0.21, 0.11)], establishing noninferiority of bexagliflozin to glimepiride by the prespecified margin of 3.83 mmol/mol [0.35%]. Prespecified tests gave, in order, a difference in body mass of -4.31 kg (95% CI -5.10, -3.52; P < 0.0001), a difference in SBP of -6.53 mm Hg (95% CI -10.56, -2.51; P = 0.0008), and an odds ratio of 0.12 (95% CI 0.05, 0.28; P < 0.0001) for severe or documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia. At the follow-up visit the mean difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between arms was 6.05 mL min-1 per 1.73 m2 (95% CI, 3.24, 8.87; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bexagliflozin was noninferior to glimepiride in lowering HbA1c, was superior to glimepiride for decreases in body mass and SBP, and was associated with significantly fewer hypoglycaemic events than glimepiride. A favourable effect on eGFR was observed.

Effect of Subcutaneous Tirzepatide vs Placebo Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS-5 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The effects of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, as an addition to insulin glargine for treatment of type 2 diabetes have not been described. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide added to insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 45 medical research centers and hospitals in 8 countries (enrollment from August 30, 2019, to March 20, 2020; follow-up completed January 13, 2021) in 475 adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control while treated with once-daily insulin glargine with or without metformin. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 5-mg (n = 116), 10-mg (n = 119), or 15-mg (n = 120) tirzepatide or volume-matched placebo (n = 120) over 40 weeks. Tirzepatide was initiated at 2.5 mg/week and escalated by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was achieved. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was mean change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 40. The 5 key secondary end points included mean change in body weight and percentage of patients achieving prespecified HbA1c levels. Results: Among 475 randomized participants (211 [44%] women; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.9] years; mean [SD] HbA1c, 8.31% [0.85%]), 451 (94.9%) completed the trial. Treatment was prematurely discontinued by 10% of participants in the 5-mg tirzepatide group, 12% in the 10-mg tirzepatide group, 18% in the 15-mg tirzepatide group, and 3% in the placebo group. At week 40, mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.40% with 10-mg tirzepatide and -2.34% with 15-mg tirzepatide vs -0.86% with placebo (10 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.53% [97.5% CI, -1.80% to -1.27%]; 15 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.47% [97.5% CI, -1.75% to -1.20%]; P < .001 for both). Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.11% with 5-mg tirzepatide (difference vs placebo, -1.24% [95% CI, -1.48% to -1.01%]; P < .001]). Mean body weight change from baseline was -5.4 kg with 5-mg tirzepatide, -7.5 kg with 10-mg tirzepatide, -8.8 kg with 15-mg tirzepatide and 1.6 kg with placebo (5 mg: difference, -7.1 kg [95% CI, -8.7 to -5.4]; 10 mg: difference, -9.1 kg [95% CI, -10.7 to -7.5]; 15 mg: difference, -10.5 kg [95% CI, -12.1 to -8.8]; P < .001 for all). Higher percentages of patients treated with tirzepatide vs those treated with placebo had HbA1c less than 7% (85%-90% vs 34%; P < .001 for all). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the tirzepatide groups vs placebo group were diarrhea (12%-21% vs 10%) and nausea (13%-18% vs 3%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control despite treatment with insulin glargine, the addition of subcutaneous tirzepatide, compared with placebo, to titrated insulin glargine resulted in statistically significant improvements in glycemic control after 40 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04039503.

Immunogenicity of the Novel Glucagon Analogue Dasiglucagon: Results of a Dedicated Immunogenicity Trial in Type 1 Diabetes.

Dasiglucagon is a next-generation glucagon analogue that is stable in aqueous formulation. This dedicated immunogenicity trial to support use as rescue treatment for severe hypoglycemia was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity of repeated subcutaneous doses of dasiglucagon in subjects with type 1 diabetes. A total of 112 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive three subcutaneous weekly doses of either 0.6 mg dasiglucagon or 1.0 mg recombinant glucagon (GlucaGen®) according to a double-blind parallel-group trial design. Subjects were followed for 15 weeks, with a multitiered testing approach planned for assessment of antidrug antibody (ADA) formation. For the primary immunogenicity endpoint, the overall ADA incidence was zero, as no subject demonstrated any treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA response at any time point in this trial involving three consecutive weekly doses of trial drug. No injection site reactions were reported for subjects receiving dasiglucagon. There were no unexpected safety findings for the trial.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: The PRONTO-T1D Extension.

INTRODUCTION: The PRONTO-T1D study, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), met the primary endpoint of noninferiority of HbA1c change from baseline compared to lispro at 26 weeks. We present results of an additional 26-week treatment phase evaluating long-term efficacy and safety of URLi. METHODS: In this phase 3, treat-to-target study, subjects were randomized to double-blind mealtime URLi, lispro, or open-label postmeal URLi with insulin degludec or glargine for 26 weeks. Subjects in the double-blind URLi (n = 451) and lispro (n = 442) groups continued for another 26 weeks to assess long-term efficacy and safety. RESULTS: HbA1c increased marginally during the long-term maintenance period (week 26-52) in both groups to 7.47% (URLi) and 7.54% (lispro). At week 52, there were no statistically significant treatment differences in change from baseline HbA1c with a least-squares mean treatment difference (95% confidence interval) of - 0.06% (- 0.16, 0.03). Proportions of patients with HbA1c < 7% at week 52 were similar (URLi, 26.8%; lispro, 24.5%). Self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) showed that 1-h (9.23 versus 10.14 mmol/L) and 2-h (8.40 versus 9.53 mmol/L) postmeal daily mean glucose was statistically significantly (p < 0.001) lower with URLi than lispro. The rate and incidence of severe, documented, and postprandial hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dl [3.0 mmol/L]) were similar between treatments, but URLi demonstrated a 31% lower rate in the period more than 4 h after meals, (p = 0.023). Injection site reactions were reported by 3.3% of patients on URLi and 0.9% on lispro. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: Overall glycemic control and improved postprandial glucose via SMBG were maintained after 52 weeks with URLi versus lispro, suggesting that the efficacy of URLi is preserved during long-term treatment in patients with T1D. No long-term safety issues were identified with URLi. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214367.

Ultra rapid lispro improves postprandial glucose control compared with lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the 26-week PRONTO-T1D study.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes in a 26-week, treat-to-target, phase 3 trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After an 8-week lead-in to optimize basal insulin glargine or degludec, patients were randomized to double-blind mealtime URLi (n = 451) or lispro (n = 442), or open-label post-meal URLi (n = 329). The primary endpoint was change from baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to 26 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%), with multiplicity-adjusted objectives for postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions after a meal test. RESULTS: Both mealtime and post-meal URLi demonstrated non-inferiority to lispro for HbA1c: estimated treatment difference (ETD) for mealtime URLi -0.08% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16, 0.00] and for post-meal URLi +0.13% (95% CI 0.04, 0.22), with a significantly higher endpoint HbA1c for post-meal URLi versus lispro (P = 0.003). Mealtime URLi was superior to lispro in reducing 1- and 2-hour PPG excursions during the meal test: ETD -1.55 mmol/L (95% CI -1.96, -1.14) at 1 hour and - 1.73 mmol/L (95% CI -2.28, -1.18) at 2 hours (both P < 0.001). The rate and incidence of severe, documented and postprandial hypoglycaemia (<3.0 mmol/L) was similar between treatments, but mealtime URLi demonstrated a 37% lower rate in the period >4 hours after meals (P = 0.013). Injection site reactions were reported by 2.9% of patients on mealtime URLi, 2.4% on post-meal URLi, and 0.2% on lispro. Overall, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that URLi provided good glycaemic control, with non-inferiority to lispro confirmed for both mealtime and post-meal URLi, while superior PPG control was demonstrated with mealtime dosing.

Increased insulin clearance in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 Pro12Ala.

The Pro12Ala polymorphism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARgamma(2)) is associated with reduced risk for type 2 diabetes. Although increased insulin sensitivity of glucose disposal and lipolysis has been reported, the exact mechanism by which the risk reduction is conferred is not clear. Because the conclusion of greater insulin sensitivity hinged upon lower insulin levels in some studies, it is possible that more efficient insulin clearance is involved. We therefore estimated insulin clearance during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate divided by steady-state insulin concentration, 229 normal glucose tolerant [NGT] subjects), an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (mean C-peptide divided by mean insulin concentrations, 406 NGT, 54 impaired glucose tolerant or mildly diabetic subjects), and a hyperglycemic clamp (120 minutes, 10 mmol/L, C-peptide divided by insulin in the steady-state, 56 NGT subjects). In the carriers of the Ala allele (prevalence approximately 24%), insulin clearance in all 3 protocols was significantly greater ( approximately 10%), than in controls. While the results from the euglycemic clamp reflect both hepatic and peripheral insulin clearance, those from the OGTT and the hyperglycemic clamp reflect mainly hepatic insulin extraction. Free fatty acids (FFA) during the steady state of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp were significantly lower in carriers of the Ala allele (26 +/- 5 micromol/L) than in controls (46 +/- 3 micromol/L, P =.02). In conclusion, the Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with increased insulin clearance. This could be the result of reduced FFA delivery, which has been shown to improve hepatic insulin removal and sensitivity. Because PPARgamma(2) is mainly expressed in adipose tissue, one of the main regulatory effects of the polymorphism may well be the more efficient suppression of (possibly intra-abdominal) lipolysis.

Intramyocellular lipids: anthropometric determinants and relationships with maximal aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity.

The existence of metabolically relevant intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) as assessed by the noninvasive (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been established. In the present studies, we analyzed the relationships between IMCL in two muscle types [the predominantly nonoxidative tibialis muscle (tib) and the predominantly oxidative soleus muscle (sol)] and anthropometric data, aerobic capacity (VO(2)max, bicycle ergometry, n = 77) and insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, n = 105) using regression analysis. In univariate regression, IMCL (tib) was weakly but significantly correlated with percentage of body fat (r = 0.28, P = 0.01), whereas IMCL (sol) was better correlated with waist-to-hip ratio (r = 0.41, P < 0.0001). No significant univariate correlation with age or maximal aerobic power was observed. After adjusting for adiposity, IMCL (tib) was positively correlated with measures of aerobic fitness. A significant interaction term between VO(2)max and percentage of body fat on IMCL (tib) (P = 0.04) existed (whole model r(2) = 0.26, P = 0.001). In contrast, aerobic fitness did not influence IMCL (sol). No correlation between insulin sensitivity as such and IMCL (tib) (r = -0.13, P = 0.2) or IMCL (sol) (r = 0.03, P = 0.72) was observed. Nethertheless, a significant interaction term between VO(2)max and IMCL on insulin sensitivity existed [P = 0.04 (tib) and P = 0.02 (sol)]; [whole model (sol) r(2) = 0.61, P < 0.0001, (tib) r(2) = 0.60, P < 0.0001]. In conclusion, obesity and aerobic fitness are important determinants of IMCL. IMCL and insulin sensitivity are negatively correlated in untrained subjects. The correlation between the two parameters is modified by the extent of aerobic fitness and cannot be found in endurance trained subjects. Thus, measurements of aerobic fitness and body fat are indispensable for the interpretation of IMCL and its relationship with insulin sensitivity.

Lipid content in the musculature of the lower leg assessed by fat selective MRI: intra- and interindividual differences and correlation with anthropometric and metabolic data.

PURPOSE: To assess the muscular lipid content (LC) in different muscle groups of the lower leg by a magnetic resonance imaging technique working with chemical shift selective excitation, and comparison with anthropometric and metabolic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Examinations were performed in 67 volunteers (54 male/13 female, age 29 +/- seven years) on a 1.5 T whole body imager, applying a highly selective spectral-spatial technique for fat selective MRI. LC was measured in six calf muscles and correlated with body mass index (BMI), percent body fat (PFAT), and insulin sensitivity (IS) of the subjects. RESULTS: Mean muscular LC of all subjects was between 2.0% (Tibialis posterior [TP]) and 3.8% (Peroneus muscles) with female subjects showing a significantly higher LC in all muscle groups (P < 0.05 each). LCs correlated moderately with BMI (R between 0.39 [TP] and 0.53 [GM]) and with PFAT (R between 0.38 [TP] and 0.62 [GM]). Insulin-resistant subjects showed slightly but not significantly increased LC compared to insulin-sensitive subjects in BMI-matched subgroups. CONCLUSION: The fat-selective MRI technique allows a reliable non-invasive measure of muscular lipids - even in muscle groups with inherent low LC - within a relatively short measurement time of about three minutes. The presented data reveal interesting interrelationships between LC and anthropometric and metabolic data, and therefore provide new insight into muscular fat metabolism.

Effect of glimepiride on insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in cultured human skeletal muscle cells: a comparison to glibenclamide.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of glimepiride on insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in cultured human skeletal muscle cells in comparison with glibenclamide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Myotubes derived from glucose-tolerant subjects were incubated with glimepiride or glibenclamide (0-100 micro mol/l) for 4 h and with or without insulin (100 nmol/l) for 2 h, and subsequently glycogen synthesis was determined. RESULTS: Glimepiride had no significant effect on basal glycogen synthesis; in contrast, glimepiride caused a dose-dependent increase of insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis, with a maximal effect of 39.97 +/- 8.4% (mean +/- SEM, n = 4, P < 0,02). The time course of this glimepiride effect on insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis showed a peak after 12 h incubation with a half maximal effect after 4 h. Preincubation of the myotubes with wortmannin (100 nmol/l), an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol (PI)- 3 kinase, caused an inhibition of this glimepiride effect on insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis. In contrast to glimepiride, incubation of myotubes with glibenclamide (0-100nmol/l), a second generation sulfonylurea, had no significant effect on basal or insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Incubation of cultured human skeletal muscle cells derived from glucose-tolerant subjects with glimepiride caused a dose-dependent increase of insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis using therapeutic glimepiride concentrations. This glimepiride effect seems to be mediated via the PI3 kinase pathway. In contrast to glimepiride, glibenclamide had no significant effect on basal or insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis. These results suggest that glimepiride, beside its well-known effect to stimulate insulin secretion, possess an insulin-sensitizing action in cultured human skeletal muscle cells in support of the concept of an extrapancreatic action of glimepiride.