Patient-centred attitudes among medical students: gender and work experience in health care make a difference.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of medical students' patient-centred attitudes show a decline across undergraduate education and overall higher scores for female students. AIM: To assess undergraduate students' patient-centred attitudes at various stages of education and to explore possible associations between attitudes and age, gender and work experience in health care. METHODS: In autumn 2005, medical students in Gothenburg (n = 797) were asked to answer Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), a validated instrument exploring attitudes towards the doctor-patient relationship. Data including gender, age, current term and students' work experience in health care were collected. RESULTS: Of 797 students 600 (75%) answered the questionnaire. No decrease of students' PPOS score across the curriculum was observed. PPOS scores from female students were higher compared to males (p < 0.0001) and female scores were significantly higher in the later terms compared with earlier (p = 0.0011). Female students had more experience from working in health care (p = 0.0023). Extended work experience was associated with higher PPOS only among females (p = 0.0031). CONCLUSION: No decline of students' patient-centred attitudes may indicate an ongoing shift. Gender differences in patient-centred attitudes were reproduced. Work experience in health care presents a new gender difference. These gender differences should be considered when training patient-centred attitudes and skills.

Impact of medical students' descriptive evaluations on long-term course development.

BACKGROUND: In medical education, feedback from students is helpful in course evaluation. However, the impact of medical students' feedback on long-term course development is seldom reported. In this project we studied the correspondence between medical students' descriptive evaluations and key features of course development over five years. METHODS: Qualitative content analysis was used. The context was consultation skills courses in the middle of the Göteborg undergraduate curriculum during five years. An analysis of 158 students' descriptive evaluations was brought together with an analysis of key features of course development; learning objectives, course records, protocols from teachers' evaluations and field notes. Credibility of data was tested by two colleagues and by presenting themes at seminars and conferences. Authors' experiences of evaluating the course over many years were also used. RESULTS: A corresponding pattern was found in students' descriptive evaluations and key features of course development, indicating the impact of students' open-ended feed-back. Support to facilitators and a curriculum reform also contributed. Students' descriptive feedback was both initiating and validating longitudinal course implementation. During five years, students' descriptive evaluations and teachers' course records were crucial sources in a learner-centred knowledge-building process of course development. CONCLUSION: Students' descriptive evaluations and course records can be seen as important instruments in developing both courses and students' learning. Continuity and endurance in the evaluation process must be emphasized for achieving relevant and useful results.

Instrumental strategy: A stage in students' consultation skills training? Observations and reflections on students' communication in general practice consultations.

OBJECTIVES: To explore and examine students' abilities to communicate with patients during a general practice course in the final year of the curriculum and to analyse and consider this experience in relation to earlier consultation training. SETTING: General practice courses in the undergraduate curriculum. DESIGN: Qualitative data analysis was used. A special focus-group interview of experienced supervisors was performed and analysed (editing analysis). Credibility of data was tested at local seminars and conferences. Authors' experiences of observing student consultations over many years were also used. RESULTS: A main theme, 'open invitation', emerged based on categories 'initially attentive' and 'listening attitude'. In contrast, the second main theme was 'instrumental strategy', based on the following categories: 'one-sided collection of medical facts' and 'relationship-building lost'. The students also had difficulties in devoting attention to patients' life experiences. An hourglass metaphor of students' and young physicians' progression of communication strategies is presented. The narrow part of the hourglass corresponds to an instrumental strategy at the end of undergraduate clinical education. CONCLUSIONS: An instrumental strategy may be a stage in student's consultation learning progression that interferes with communication training. A question is raised: is training of a patient-centred approach throughout the clinical curriculum needed for optimal development of consultation skills? Further research is needed to test this hypothesis.