[Memorandum 'Development of health services research in Bavaria from the perspective of the Bavarian State Working Group 'Health Services Research (LAGeV)': status quo - potential - strategies']. / Memorandum "Weiterentwicklung der Gesundheitsversorgungsforschung in Bayern aus Sicht der Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Gesundheitsversorgungsforschung: Status quo - Entwicklungspotenziale - Strategien".

The aim of the memorandum on the development of health services research (HSR) in Bavaria is to operationalise the global objectives of the State Working Group "Health Services Research" (LAGeV) and to collectively define future topics, specific implementation steps, methods as well as ways of working for the future course of the LAGeV. The LAGeV is an expert committee that integrates and links the competencies of different actors from science, politics and health care regarding HSR and facilitates their cooperation. The memorandum is based on an explorative survey among the LAGeV members, which identified the status quo of health services research in Bavaria, potential for development, important constraints, promoting factors, specific recommendations as well as future topics for the further development of HSR in Bavaria. From the perspective of the LAGeV members, the 12 most important future topics are: 1) Interface and networking research, 2) Innovative health care concepts, 3) Health care for multimorbid patients, 4)Health care for chronically ill patients, 5) Evaluation of innovations, processes and technologies, 6) Patient orientation and user focus, 7) Social and regional inequalities in health care, 8) Health care for mentally ill patients, 9) Indicators of health care quality, 10) Regional needs planning, 11) Practical effectiveness of HSR and 12) Scientific use of routine data. Potential for development of HSR in Bavaria lies a) in the promotion of networking and sustainable structures, b) the establishment of an HSR information platform that bundles information and results in regard to current topics and aims to facilitate cooperation as well as c) in the initiation of measures and projects. The latter ought to pinpoint health care challenges and make recommendations regarding the improvement of health care and its quality. The cooperation and networking structures that were established with the LAGeV should be continuously expanded and be used to work on priority topics in order to achieve the global objectives of the LAGeV.

[One-year outcomes for proximal femoral fractures: Posthospital analysis of mortality and care levels based on health insurance data]. / Einjahresverläufe nach proximalen Femurfrakturen: Poststationäre Analyse von Letalität und Pflegestufen durch Kassendaten.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femur fractures are common and treatment is expensive. The aim of the present study was - after matching of hospital and health insurance data - to evaluate the influence of early operation on certain outcome parameters. Data from a German health insurance were used to identify then influence of the day of operation after admittance on the rate of mortality, decubitus, and revision surgery during the hospital stay and on the care level of the patients up to 1 year and in some cases longer after operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 7905 patients were included. The descriptive data, specifying the given population, described the hospital stay (occurrence, surgical procedures, early complications, secondary diagnoses, length of stay) and the course of patient recovery up to 1 year after the hospital stay (care level, late complications). The calculated data (analytical statistics) give correlations evaluating the influence of the length of the preoperative hospital stay on the outcome parameters mentioned above. Risk adjustment was performed by using secondary diagnoses. RESULTS: The study included more women (mean age 81.5 years). Most common was the femoral neck fracture. Of the operations 77% were carried out on the first day after admission; dominating procedures were intramedullary nails and prostheses. Most common secondary diagnoses were diabetes, dementia, ischemic heart disease, and chronic heart insufficiency. Descriptive data revealed 6% early as well as late complications. In all, 50% of patients had a higher care level after operation. Almost 40% of patients changed from outpatient care to inpatient care. The time interval between admission and operation negatively influenced all outcome parameters. The relative risk to die, to develop decubitus, or to receive early revision was increased by approximately one third when patients were operated on later than the first day after admission. A total of 3172 patients died during the study period. Mortality after operation reached 9.9% within 30 days and 26.9% at 1 year. The mortality of patients operated after the first day was increased by more than 6% compared to patients treated within the first 24 h. CONCLUSION: The present study clearly presents the importance of analysis of routine records after discharge and it demonstrates that longer periods up to 1 year and more can be evaluated. The data show that a longer time period between hospital admission and operation negatively influences all outcome parameters. The care data give impressive evidence for a significant loss of quality of life and the importance of intense postoperative rehabilitation.