Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(47): e36187, 2023 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013336

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of frailty and its relationship with health outcomes in elderly outpatients attending a Diabetes Specialist Clinic. This study was a cross-sectional study. A total of 168 elderly patients (aged 65 years and above) attending the Diabetes Specialist Clinic of a Three-A hospital of Sichuan province were recruited from January 2021 to February 2021, and follow-up was conducted 1 year after day of screening. Baseline characteristics of patients were collected and frail status were assessed at recruitment. The longitudinal outcomes included hospitalization, fall, mortality, emergency visit, and clinic visit. The presence of frailty was determined by the 5-item FRAIL scale, which ranges from 0 to 5 and are categorized as frail (3-5), prefrail (1-2), and robust (0). A phone questionnaire was carried out to obtain health outcomes. Logistic regression analyses was used to evaluate adverse health outcomes at 1 year follow-up. Of the 168 outpatients, 28.0% was robust, 49.4% was prefrail, and 22.6% was frail. Frailty (both prefrail and frail status) was more prevalent in those patients, which were 75 years old and above (57.0%; P < .001), insulin dependent (45.6%; P = .008), and those had diabetic complications (43.8%; P = .005), previous admission (68.6%; P = .016), and co-morbidities (36.4%; P = .001). In the following year after recruitment, 19.1% of robust patients were hospitalized, while the proportion was 45.8% for prefrail patients and 65.8% for frail patients. Prefrail (OR [odds ratio] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-2.88; P = .028) and frail (OR = 4.63, 95% CI 2.52-5.81; P = .005) patients were more likely to be hospitalized. Frail (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 2.68-4.04; P < .001) patients were more inclined to fall while prefrail patients (OR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.56; P = .371) were not. Moreover, prefrail (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 2.31-5.72; P = .017) and frail (OR = 4.29, 95% CI 3.16-5.54; P = .006) patients were more likely to return to the clinic. There is a high incidence of frailty among elderly patients attending a Diabetes Specialist Clinic. Frailty is a predictor of hospitalization, fall, and clinic visits within 1 year.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Frailty , Aged , Humans , Frailty/epidemiology , Frailty/complications , Frail Elderly , Cross-Sectional Studies , Outpatients , Prevalence , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Geriatric Assessment
2.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 35(4): 1226-1239, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Caring is an essential component of professional nursing practice, which directly affects the quality of patient care. Nurses' caring ability may not meet patients' demands for high-quality care. There are challenges in designing and implementing interventions to improve nurses' caring ability, especially in China. Understanding Chinese nurses' caring ability and related influential factors serves as the basis for effective interventions to improve their ability to care for patients. AIM: To describe the caring ability of nurses and its potential predictors in China. METHODS: From January to February 2018, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 2304 Registered Nurses working at different levels of hospitals across 29 provinces in China. The structured online survey included socio-demographic information, Caring Ability Inventory, Caring Efficacy Scale and Professional Quality of Life. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Overall caring ability and its three dimensions of the participants were all significantly lower than the Nkongho' norm, an international scoring standard of nurse's caring ability. Age, employment type, workplace, caring efficacy, compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress were predictors of knowing, explaining 41.8% of the variance. Predictors of courage were educational level, bereavement experience, caring efficacy, compassion satisfaction and burnout (31.7% of the variance). Educational level, workplace, exposure to critically ill patients, caring efficacy, compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress were influencing factors of patience, accounting for 19.5% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese nurses' caring ability, with patience, knowing, and courage in descending order. Particular attention needs to be paid to the courage dimension of the nurses' caring ability. Further, the predictors of overall caring ability and each dimension were diverse. These results indicate that nurse educators and administrators need to identify training priorities and design targeted interventions based on the influencing factors.


Subject(s)
Nurses , Quality of Life , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Job Satisfaction
3.
J Clin Nurs ; 29(15-16): 3025-3041, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353918

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the understanding of caring in the practice of community nursing from the perspectives of patients and nurses. BACKGROUND: An increasing population of patients with chronic disease has produced a need for humanistic caring in communities. As a result, caring has become a core value of community nursing professionals. However, community nurses meet many difficulties in trying to practice person-centred care with their clients. Furthermore, most community nurses-especially in China-lack systematic education and training about caring because the practical meaning of caring in community practice is unknown. DESIGN: The qualitative study described herein employed inductive content analysis. METHODS: Eleven community patients with chronic disease and fifteen community nurses who were nominated as a caring nurse from different community clinics in Beijing, China, participated in thirty-one interviews during January to August in 2018. Nine documents from the interviewed nurses were collected. Both interview data and documents were analysed using strategies of inductive content analysis. The COREQ checklist was used. RESULTS: Patients and their corresponding nurses described a wide range of caring experiences that were generalised into 28 concepts. Caring emerged as an inter-dynamic system that comprised the foundation and quality of a caring relationship, the caring philosophy and behaviours of interactions, and positive feedback from caring interactions. A relationship-based framework of caring in community nursing practice was constructed. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying this systematic concept of caring provides insights that are applicable to the creation of targeted management, education and practice interventions to ultimately enhance the quality of community health care-in China or elsewhere. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The systematic understanding of caring in community nursing practice will inform nurses in community health clinics, their educators and their managers on how to provide care to community patients and how to develop caring competence for community nurses.


Subject(s)
Community Health Nursing/organization & administration , Empathy , Nurse-Patient Relations , Adult , Beijing , Chronic Disease/nursing , Female , Humans , Male , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...