Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Rev Mal Respir ; 30(1): 56-61, 2013 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23318190

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (i-PR) after lung resection (LR) for cancer. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2009, we conducted a prospective observational study on patients admitted in our institution. An i-PR was offered to all patients. They completed respiratory function tests and a quality of life (QoL) questionnaire at the start and after completing the i-PR. RESULTS: During the study, 154 out of 175 patients who underwent LR and who were admitted in our center followed an i-PR. The remaining 21 patients were excluded because of emergency re-hospitalisation (10 patients), anticipated departure (six patients) or refusal to participate (five patients). Most functional parameters in the 154 treated patients improved between the beginning and the end of their stay: FVC (69.9% versus 79.6%; P<0.0001); FEV(1) (61.2% versus 69.9%; P<0.0001); timed walk-6MWT (356 m versus 444 m; P<0.0001) and constant work cycle ergometry test (281 s versus 683 s; P<0.0001). Also, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-LC13 improved during the stay, especially global health status (50.5 versus 64.5; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative PR is safe and could positively impact on functional status and QoL among this population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung/physiopathology , Pneumonectomy/rehabilitation , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/physiopathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/rehabilitation , Exercise Test , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Lung Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function/physiology , Respiratory Function Tests , Treatment Outcome
2.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 97(5): 533-40, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21741890

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Total disc replacement (TDR) has existed since 1984 but is not covered by the French national healthcare system (Sécurité Sociale). The present study assessed clinical outcomes, and also pre-, peri- and postoperative treatment costs. HYPOTHESIS: Surgical management of low back pain (LBP) provides medical and economic benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study recruited 19 patients in the Nice University Hospital Center (France); mean age, 41 years; 15 female. Inclusion criteria were: age less than 60 years; chronic low back pain (LBP) with single-segment discopathy; work related injuries and patients not covered under the General provision of the Sécurité Sociale were excluded. VAS, Oswestry and SF36 scores and return to work capability were analyzed. The local national health insurance branch office (Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie [CPAM]) provided detailed coverage data for a 39-month period around the operation. RESULTS: Revision surgery was required for one instance of vertebral fracture. Preoperative follow-up was 14 months, postoperative FU 21 months and the perioperative period 4 months. LBP and quality of life showed improvement. Seventy-nine percent of patients reported satisfaction, 59% returned to work, and 84% had leisure activity. Total CPAM payout (reimbursement) was €399,082. Daily sickness benefit and disability compensation were the main cost items. Mean TDR cost per patient was €6833. Mean reimbursements were 19% lower post- than preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative clinical results did not correlate, while pre- and postoperative reimbursement costs did, as did cost and postoperative clinical status (r=-0.72). Preoperative cost was a predictive factor for postoperative clinical result. DISCUSSION: TDR achieves favorable medicoeconomic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III: case-control study.


Subject(s)
Total Disc Replacement/economics , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Total Disc Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Diabetes Metab ; 37(5): 419-25, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489844

ABSTRACT

AIM: Currently, there is no international consensus for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis. This is a report of our experience of GDM screening according to the 1996 French guidelines. METHODS: For 5 years, all pregnant women followed at our hospital (n=11,545) were prospectively screened for GDM between weeks 24 and 28 of pregnancy with a two-step strategy: the O'Sullivan test (OS) with a threshold at 130 mg/dL, followed by a 100-g OGTT if positive. GDM was diagnosed according to Carpenter and Coustan criteria. RESULTS: Prevalence of GDM was 4.26% [344/1451 of patients with an OS of 130-199 mg/dL (12.1%); and 148 patients with an OS greater than 200 mg/dL]. The false-positive rate for the OS was 76.8%. Compared with 140 mg/dL, a threshold of 130 mg/dL caused 401 additional negative OGTTs in 90% of cases. In 80.7% GDM patients, fasting glucose was less than 95 mg/dL. The time lag between OS and OGTT was 3 weeks (1-84 days). Risk factors associated with GDM were maternal age, preconception overweight and obesity, parity, personal history of GDM or macrosomia, and familial history of obesity (P<0.05), but not diabetes. Also, 20% of GDM patients had no risk factors, whereas they were present in 75% of patients without GDM. CONCLUSION: In our population, a two-step screening strategy for GDM was neither relevant nor efficient. It could be simplified with a single-step definitive screening strategy using a 75-g OGTT, as used in the HAPO study, and as recommended by the IADPSG and the recent French Expert Consensus. At present, there are still no evidence-based arguments to help in deciding between selective or universal screening for GDM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Body Mass Index , Female , France/epidemiology , Glucose Intolerance/diagnosis , Glucose Intolerance/epidemiology , Glucose Tolerance Test/methods , Glucose Tolerance Test/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mediterranean Region/epidemiology , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Med Mal Infect ; 41(4): 192-6, 2011 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21251781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A prospective observation study was undertaken in seven medical centers, in the French region Alpes-Maritime, to assess nail hygiene of healthcare professionals and how often they wear hand jewellery. METHOD: Seven hundred and six healthcare workers in seven medical centers were interviewed from March to April 2008. RESULTS: Among the 706 professionals, 306 (43%) were wearing one or several pieces of jewellery. The nails of 81 (11.5%) were non-standard according to guidelines. Three hundred and forty-four health care professionals (49%) were wearing one or several pieces of jewellery and/or presented with non-standard nails. In univariate analysis, the wearing of jewellery was linked to the medical centre (P<0.001), to the professional category (p<0.001), to the number of times people washed their hands or used hand gel per day (ABHR) by categories (<10 times per day or ≥10 times per day) (P<0.017). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors linked to the wearing of jewellery were the medical centers, the professional category, and the age. CONCLUSION: There are still too many healthcare professionals who do not comply to French recommendations on hand hygiene concerning the wearing of jewellery and nail hygiene standards.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Jewelry/statistics & numerical data , Cosmetics , France , Hand , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Hygiene , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Nails , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 34(4): 493-6, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19675030

ABSTRACT

Dupuytren's disease has a high rate of recurrence after treatment. In this study we have assessed the usefulness of histological staging in the prediction of recurrence. We have also verified whether there is a correlation between histological staging and features of Dupuytren's diathesis. We studied 139 hands in 124 Caucasian patients treated between 1997 and 2004. There was a significant difference in the recurrence rate between the three histological types (P = 0.04). Histological staging was independent of features of Dupuytren's diathesis. This study confirms that histological staging is a reliable method for predicting recurrence. However, it should be used in association with clinical data to determine precisely the prognosis of patients suffering from Dupuytren's contracture.


Subject(s)
Dupuytren Contracture/pathology , Dupuytren Contracture/surgery , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Collagen/metabolism , Connective Tissue/pathology , Connective Tissue/surgery , Disease Susceptibility/pathology , Dupuytren Contracture/classification , Fascia/pathology , Fasciotomy , Female , Fibrosis , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitosis/physiology , Postoperative Complications/classification , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
6.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 54(6): 517-27, 2006 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17194983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of pressure sores in a university hospital and to assess the risk of developing a pressure sore. METHODS: A one-day survey was performed in all hospitalized patients, day hospital excepted. The Garches scale was used to assess the severity of pressure sores and the Braden scale was used to measure the patient's risk for the development of pressure ulcers. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred and eleven patients were included, mean age was 62+/-23 years and 53.3% were over 65 years old. In hospitalized patients, 64% were in acute care, 29% in intermediate medicine and long-term care and 7% in intensive care units. We have found 675 pressure sores in 268 patients, mean age of 76 years; 263 decubitus ulcers were acquired during hospitalization. The most frequent sites were heels (46%) and sacrum (26%). Stage 1 pressure ulcers showed 33% of the total. The total prevalence was 16.6%, 95% CI (14.9-18.6), the hospital acquired pressure sores prevalence was 7.5%, all stages included. A Braden score less than or equal to 15 was found in 29.1% of hospitalized patients. Standard mattresses were used in 37% of patients with pressure sores. Multivariate analysis showed that age and a Braden score less than or equal to 15 were significantly associated with pressure sores. CONCLUSION: Pressure sores are still an important problem in hospital; occurrence must be considered as an iatrogenic event and management requires a multidisciplinary approach.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, University , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...