ABSTRACT
Case reports have reported immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), especially nivolumab, are associated with recurrent pericardial effusions. Our objective was to determine how often patients being treated with ICI develop hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis compared with other cancer therapeutics and whether the survival of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis differs according to ICI use versus standard cancer therapeutics. Our institutional review board approved catheterization laboratory data collection for all pericardiocenteses performed and all patients receiving ICI from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. Retrospective review of the electronic medical record was performed to identify cancer therapeutics given preceding pericardiocentesis. Log-rank analysis was performed to compare survival in patients requiring pericardiocentesis between those on ICI and those not on ICI. Overall, 3,966 patients received ICI of which only 15 pericardiocenteses were required, including 1 repeat pericardiocentesis in a patient on nivolumab. The prevalence of pericardiocentesis among patients on ICI was 0.38% (15/3,966). Eleven pericardiocenteses were performed after nivolumab infusion, 3 after pembrolizumab, and 1 after atezolizumab, with pericardiocentesis prevalences for each agent of 0.61% (11/1,798), 0.19% (3/1,560), and 0.32% (1/309), respectively. One hundred and twenty pericardiocentesis were performed on patients receiving other cancer therapeutics although no therapeutic agent was associated with more pericardiocenteses than nivolumab. In conclusion, the prevalence of hemodynamically significant pericardial effusions and ICI administration is uncommon, and survival durations after pericardiocentesis for patients receiving ICI and those not receiving ICI are similar, suggesting that frequent echocardiographic monitoring for pericardial effusions is not necessary.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , Pericardiocentesis/methods , Echocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/mortality , Pericardial Effusion/diagnosis , Pericardial Effusion/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Texas/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The number of cancer survivors in the United States has exceeded 12 million and is increasing. After secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of late morbidity and death among cancer survivors. The cardiovascular needs of cancer survivors have not been described. We describe the clinical characteristics of 53 patients seen during the first year of our Cardiovascular Prevention in Cancer Survivors clinic. The mean age of the patients was 40.1 ± 13.7 years. The mean survival since cancer diagnosis was 13.9 years. A history of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy was present in 21%, and 5.7% had known atherosclerotic disease. One fourth had hypertension; 32.1%, dyslipidemia; and 13%, diabetes mellitus. Three quarters had received anthracycline chemotherapy, while half had received radiation. Half had an abnormal echocardiogram (55%), and 11 of 18 had an abnormal carotid ultrasonogram. The mean Framingham risk score for patients older than 30 years (n=37) was 8.4, yielding a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease of 7.6%. The mean vascular age was 54.3 years, and the mean chronological age was 46.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 566 ± 213 days. There were significant improvements in serum triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein levels, as well as trends toward improved blood pressure control. Cardiovascular risk factors are prevalent in cancer survivors. There is an immediate need for the widespread availability of cardiovascular preventive services to reduce the late adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiation. Early intervention might help to improve the cardiovascular risk profile.
