Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus intensive conventional insulin therapy in type I and type II diabetic pregnancy.

Two groups of pregnant diabetic women, fifteen with type I and fourteen with type II diabetes, were randomly assigned either to CSII or to ICT and the subgroups compared with respect to glycaemic control, insulin requirement and perinatal out-come. Ten non-diabetic pregnant women served as controls for the variations in the metabolic parameters considered (24-hour mean blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin). Strict glycaemic control was achieved and maintained by both regimens before week 13 in all patients with type I and in 57.1% of patients with type II diabetes. The mean insulin requirements in the type I group increased up to week 34-36 and then stabilized to term in patients receiving CSII and rose progressively to term in those receiving ICT. In the type II group insulin requirements rose up to week 36 in patients receiving CSII and up to week 32 in those receiving ICT, stabilizing thereafter on both regimens. No significant differences in mean insulin requirement at the different stages of gestation were found between the patients receiving CSII and those receiving ICT of either group. Perinatal outcome was satisfactory in both groups, although control of foetal growth was better with ICT than with CSII. CSII is a practical, safe and effective method of maintaining maternal normoglycemia in pregnancy but for the present we cannot consider it superior to ICT in the treatment of pregnant diabetic women.

Interference on metabolism induced by muzolimine and chlorthalidone in type II hypertensive diabetics.

There is a very high prevalence of hypertension in diabetic subjects, which makes it necessary to use an antihypertensive drug with the least possible metabolic interference. For example, in the early phase of hypertension, diuretics usually worsen the metabolic equilibrium. According to recent reports, a new diuretic, muzolimine (MZ), which acts on the loop of Henle, seems to present a minor effect on carbohydrate metabolic balance. In order to determine whether this assumption was correct or not, we carried out a clinical trial on 26 type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetics, in fairly good metabolic control and with moderate hypertension (orthostatic diastolic pressure from 100 to 115 mmHg), comparing the effect of MZ with those of chlorthalidone (CL). According to a randomized, single-blind cross-over design, the patients were treated with MZ (20 mg/day) or CL (50 mg/day) for the duration of 4 weeks. After the treatment period with the first drug, there was a 2 week wash-out period on placebo (PL) before the second drug was given. During the study, a set of metabolic and non-metabolic parameters was monitored, as were the clinostatic and orthostatic blood pressure values. The results show that the antihypertensive effect of the two drugs was the same (both caused a more than 10% decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure). No significant changes in plasma electrolyte levels occurred. There was a significant (p less than 0.05) increase in urinary aldosterone excretion after CL (20.7 +/- 11 micrograms/24 hours vs. 13.3 +/- 8.5 after PL, and 14.5 +/- 7.2 after MZ) (mean values +/- standard deviations).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)