ABSTRACT
Cirrhosis causes systemic and metabolic changes that culminate in various complications, such as compromised pulmonary function, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, weight loss, and muscle weakness with significant physical function limitations. Our aim is to evaluate the effects of training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the muscular and functional capacity of patients with cirrhosis classified as Child-Pugh B and C. A total of 72 patients diagnosed with cirrhosis will be recruited and randomized to perform an NMES protocol for 50 minutes, 3 times a week, for 4 weeks. The evaluations will be performed at the beginning and after 12 sessions, and patients will be submitted to a pulmonary function test, an ultrasound evaluation of the rectus femoris, an evaluation of peripheral muscle strength, a submaximal exercise capacity test associated with an evaluation of peripheral tissue oxygenation, a quality of life evaluation, and orientation about monitoring daily physical activities. The evaluators and patients will be blinded to the allocation of the groups. Training Group will be treated with the following parameters: frequency of 50 Hz, pulse width of 400 µs, rise and fall times of 2 s, and on:off 1:1; Sham Group: 5 Hz, 100 µs, on:off 1:3. The data will be analyzed using the principles of the intention to treat. This study provides health professionals with information on the benefits of this intervention. In this way, we believe that the results of this study could stimulate the use of NMES as a way of rehabilitating patients with more severe cirrhosis, with the objective of improving these patients' functional independence.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of high and low frequency and intensity, performed during hemodialysis, on physical function and inflammation markers in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Hemodialysis clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with CKD (N=51) were randomized into blocks of 4 using opaque sealed envelopes. They were divided into a group of high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation and a group of low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation. INTERVENTIONS: The high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group was submitted to neuromuscular electrical stimulation at a frequency of 50Hz and a medium intensity of 72.90mA, and the low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group used a frequency of 5Hz and a medium intensity of 13.85mA, 3 times per week for 1 hour, during 12 sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peripheral muscle strength, exercise capacity, levels of muscle trophism marker (insulin growth factor 1) and levels of proinflammatory (tumor necrosis factor α) and anti-inflammatory (interleukin 10) cytokines. RESULTS: The high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group showed a significant increase in right peripheral muscle strength (155.35±65.32Nm initial vs 161.60±68.73Nm final; P=.01) and left peripheral muscle strength (156.60±66.51Nm initial vs 164.10±69.76Nm final; P=.02) after the training, which did not occur in the low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group for both right muscle strength (109.40±32.08Nm initial vs 112.65±38.44Nm final; P=.50) and left muscle strength (113.65±37.79Nm initial vs 116.15±43.01Nm final; P=.61). The 6-minute walk test distance (6MWTD) increased in both groups: high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (435.55±95.81m initial vs 457.25±90.64m final; P=.02) and low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (403.80±90.56m initial vs 428.90±87.42m final; P=.007). The groups did not differ in peripheral muscle strength and 6MWTD after the training protocol. In the high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group, a correlation was observed between the initial and final values of 6MWTD and muscle strength. In the low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group, correlations occurred only between the 6MWTD and the initial muscle strength. Only the low frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group increased levels of insulin growth factor 1 (252.38±156.35pg/mL initial vs 336.97±207.34pg/mL final; P=.03), and only the high frequency and intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation group reduced levels of interleukin 10 (7.26±1.81pg/mL vs 6.32±1.54pg/mL; P=.03). The groups showed no differences in tumor necrosis factor α levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD on hemodialysis improve exercise capacity after peripheral neuromuscular electrical stimulation of high and low frequency and intensity. However, the benefits on muscle and inflammatory outcomes seem to be specific for the adopted electrical stimulation strategy.