Facial Fractures and Mixed Dentition - What Are the Implications of Dentition Status in Pediatric Facial Fracture Management?

INTRODUCTION: The stage of maturation of the pediatric facial skeleton at the time of injury has a significant impact on both facial fracture patterns and management strategies. For instance, the relative prominence of the pediatric cranium during the early years of life affords protection to the structures of the midface, whereas delayed aeration of the frontal sinuses may predispose younger patients to frontal bone fractures. The dentition status of a pediatric patient may have similar implications in the setting of facial fracture. In this study, the authors examine the effect of dentition status on facial fracture patterns and management strategies at an urban, level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all cases of facial fracture occurring in the pediatric patient population at a level 1 trauma center (University Hospital in Newark, NJ) between 2002 and 2014. A database including patient demographics, facial fracture, and concomitant injury patterns, and operative management data was constructed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with mixed dentition met inclusion criteria for our study and were compared against patients with primary (n = 35) and permanent (n = 349) dentition. The mean age at presentation was 9.2 years, with a male predominance of 68%. The most common fracture etiology was pedestrian struck accident (n = 23), fall (n = 21), motor vehicle collision (n = 12), and assault (n = 9). The most frequently identified facial fractures were that of the orbit (n = 31), mandible (n = 21), nasal bone (n = 19), and frontal sinus (n = 14). Additionally, 8 Le Fort and 4 nasoorbitoethmoid fractures were identified. Twenty-one patients (29%) required operative management for 1 or more facial fractures. Operative intervention was required in 38% of mandibular fractures, with 6 patients requiring only maxillomandibular fixation and 2 requiring open reduction and internal fixation with titanium plating. Nine cases of orbital fracture (29%) were managed operatively - 4 with absorbable plates, 3 with Medpor implants, and 8 with titanium plating. Management of all nasal fractures requiring operative intervention was accomplished through closed reduction. Concomitant injuries included traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 35), skull fracture (n = 24), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (n = 20), and long bone fracture (n = 12). Seventeen patients required admission to the intensive care unit. Patients with mixed dentition were significantly more likely to sustain frontal sinus and Le Fort fractures (P < 0.01), as well as skull fracture, ICH, and TBI (P < 0.01) as compared to those with permanent dentition. CONCLUSIONS: The dentition status of a pediatric patient may have significant implications in both patterns of injury and operative management strategies in the setting of acute facial trauma. Our study finds that Le Fort and frontal sinus fractures were significantly more common in patients with mixed dentition. Severe concomitant injuries such as ICH and TBI were also significantly more likely in this cohort. A patient's dentition status may also play a role in the decision for ridged fixation of mandibular and orbital fractures, as well as the method of maxillomandibular fixation in maxillary and mandibular alveolar fracture.

Assessment of Panfacial Fractures in the Pediatric Population.

PURPOSE: Management of panfacial fractures is critical and often difficult in adults; however, there is little to no literature regarding these fractures in the pediatric population. In this study, we present our experience to provide insight and further investigation regarding prevention and management strategies within the pediatric population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all panfacial fractures in the pediatric population between 2002 and 2014 treated at an urban, level 1 trauma center (University Hospital, Newark, NJ). Data including patient demographic characteristics, mechanisms of injury, locations of fractures, concomitant injuries, and surgical management strategies were collected. RESULTS: We identified 82 patients aged 18 years or younger who had sustained a panfacial fracture. The mean age at the time of injury was 12.9 years, with a male predominance of 64.9%. A total of 335 fractures were identified on radiologic imaging. The most common etiologies were motor vehicle accidents and pedestrians being struck. Orbital, frontal sinus, nasal, and zygoma fractures were the most common fractures. The mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale on arrival was 12.0. A total of 29 patients were intubated on arrival-or before arrival-at the trauma bay. A surgical airway was required in 9 patients. The most common concomitant injuries were traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and skull fracture. Surgical repair was required in 38 patients. The cephalic-to-caudal approach was used most, followed by caudal to cephalic, medial to lateral, and lateral to medial. Within a year of the initial surgical procedure, 4 patients underwent reoperations for complications. Four patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric panfacial fractures are rare occurrences; however, the impact of these injuries can be devastating, with concomitant life-threatening injuries and complications. Given the lack of literature, as well as the preventable nature of these injuries, we hope this study can address primary prevention strategies and provide insight toward the management and characteristics of these fractures.

Utility of Regional Anesthesia in Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia (RA) may help to circumvent the well-documented risks associated with general anesthesia, increase patient comfort and satisfaction, and mitigate costs. This study aims to investigate the utility of RA in extremity reconstruction. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all cases of extremity reconstruction including muscle, myocutaneous, or fasciocutaneous flaps from 2005 to 2016. Two groups were created based on anesthesia technique, regional/epidural and general. Postoperative complications included reoperation, readmission, and wound complications. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for variation in sample size, significant comorbidities, and demographics in the analysis of complications. RESULTS: A total of 2,874 cases were identified with general anesthesia utilized in 2,820 cases and RA in the remaining 54. After propensity score matching, 53 cases were identified in each group. In both unmatched and matched cohorts, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of reoperation, readmission, or wound complication rates. In the matched cohort, mean operative time in the RA cohort was significantly shorter, 157.64 (±112.36) minutes compared with 293.06 minutes (±201.35 minutes) in the general anesthesia group (p < 0.001). While no statistically significant difference was detected in mean length of stay (LOS) between the two groups, the RA group experienced a clinically significant shorter LOS of 5.77 days (±5.87 days) compared with 7.02 (±5.61) days in the general anesthesia group (p = 0.269). CONCLUSION: RA may be a safe, reasonable alternative to general anesthesia in extremity reconstruction without increase in postoperative complications. Additionally, RA use is associated with a significant reduction in operative time, potentially leading to shorter and safer procedures without compromising outcomes.

Navigating Insurance Policies in the United States for Gender-affirming Surgery.

Patients with gender dysphoria seeking to undergo gender affirmation surgery are often challenged by lack of insurance coverage. The authors aim to review gender affirmation surgery policies and to highlight discrepancies between qualifying criteria across top insurance companies in the United States. METHODS: The top 3 insurance companies in each state within the United States were determined by market share. Each insurance policy was analyzed according to coverage for specific "top surgeries" and "bottom surgeries." Policies were obtained from company-published data and phone calls placed to the insurance provider. RESULTS: Of the total 150 insurance companies identified, policies related to gender- affirming surgery were found for 124. Coverage for gender-affirming surgery varies by insurance company, state, and procedure. Most insurance companies, 122 of 124 (98%), covered chest masculinization, but only 25 of 124 (20%) of insurance companies covered nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Additionally, 36 of 124 (29%) insurance companies covered chest feminization. Vaginoplasty is covered by 120 of 124 (97%) insurance companies. Despite high rates of vaginoplasty coverage, vulvoplasty is only covered by 26 of 124 (21%) insurance companies. Phalloplasty and metoidioplasty are covered by 118 of 124 (95%) and 115 of 124 (93%) of insurance companies, respectively. Slightly more than half, 75 of 124 (60%) insurance companies covered penile prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: As gender-affirming surgery insurance coverage increases, the policies regarding them remain inconsistent. Standardized policies across insurance companies would further increase access to gender-affirming surgery.