Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 113
Filter
1.
Cancer Med ; 3(5): 1440-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913986

ABSTRACT

Squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC) disproportionately affects organ transplant recipients, and may be related to increased viral replication in the setting of immune suppression. We conducted a nested case-control study among transplant recipients to determine whether SCSC is associated with antibodies to cutaneous human papillomaviruses (HPV), to genes associated with a rare genetic susceptibility to HPV (TMC6/TMC8), or to human polyomaviruses (HPyV). Cases (n = 149) had histologically confirmed SCSC, and controls (n = 290) were individually matched to cases on time since transplant, type of transplant, gender, and race. All subjects had serum drawn immediately prior to transplant surgery. Antibodies to 25 cutaneous HPVs and six HPyVs were assayed by detection of binding to virus-like particles, and 11 TMC6/8 variants were genotyped. After correction for multiple comparisons, only antibodies to HPV37 were associated with SCSC (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.4). Common genetic variants of TMC6/8 were not associated with SCSC, but three variants in TMC8 (rs12452890, rs412611, and rs7208422) were associated with greater seropositivity for species 2 betapapillomaviruses among controls. This study suggests that some betaHPVs, but not polyomaviruses, may play a role in the excess risk of SCSC among transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Genetic Variation , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Genotype , Humans , Odds Ratio , Papillomaviridae/classification , Risk , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 145(2): 481-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748570

ABSTRACT

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials found that use of combined estrogen and progestin menopausal hormone therapy (CHT) increases breast cancer risk, but use of unopposed estrogen hormone therapy (EHT) does not. However, several questions regarding the impact of hormone use on risk of different types of breast cancer and what thresholds of use confer elevations in risk remain. We conducted a population-based case-control study among women 55-74 years of age to assess the association between menopausal hormone use and risk of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast carcinomas. Associations were evaluated using polytomous logistic regression and analyses included 880 ductal cases, 1,027 lobular cases, and 856 controls. Current EHT and CHT use were associated with 1.6-fold [95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.1-2.2] and 2.3-fold (95 % CI: 1.7-3.2) increased risks of lobular breast cancer, respectively, but neither was associated with risk of ductal cancer. Lobular cancer risk was increased after 9 years of EHT use, but after only 3 years of CHT use. Evidence across more than a dozen studies indicates that lobular carcinoma is the type of breast cancer most strongly influenced by menopausal hormones. Here, we characterize what thresholds of duration of use of both EHT and CHT that confer elevations in risk. Despite the rapid decline in hormone therapy use the WHI results were published, study of the hazards associated with these medications remains relevant given the estimated 38 million hormone therapy prescriptions that are still filled in the United States annually.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Lobular/chemically induced , Hormone Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , Progestins/therapeutic use , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Risk Assessment
3.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 23(5): 755-64, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24633144

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that recent oral contraceptive (OC) use is associated with a small increased breast cancer risk; yet risks associated with contemporary OC preparations and by molecular subtype are not well characterized. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer among women ages 20 to 44 residing in the Seattle-Puget Sound area from 2004 to 2010 (985 cases and 882 controls). We collected information on contraceptive use and participant characteristics via an in-person interview. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Lifetime duration of OC use for ≥ 15 years was associated with an increased breast cancer risk (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2). Current OC use (within 1 year of reference date) for ≥ 5 years was associated with an increased risk (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5) and there were no statistically significant differences in risk by OC preparation. Risk magnitudes were generally greater among women ages 20 to 39, and for estrogen receptor-negative (ER(-)) and triple-negative breast cancer (current use for ≥ 5 years among ages 20-39: ER(-) OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.0; triple-negative OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.8), although differences between groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of contemporary OCs and current use for ≥ 5 years was associated with an increased breast cancer risk among women ages 20 to 44. Risk may be greater among younger women and for ER(-) and triple-negative breast cancer, but these findings require confirmation. IMPACT: Continued surveillance and pooled analyses of OC use and breast cancer risk by molecular subtype are needed as OC preparations evolve.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/classification , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Risk Factors , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
JAMA Intern Med ; 173(17): 1629-37, 2013 Sep 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23921840

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Antihypertensive agents are the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States. Evidence regarding the relationship between different types of antihypertensives and breast cancer risk is sparse and inconsistent, and prior studies have lacked the capacity to assess impacts of long-term use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between use of various classes of antihypertensive medications and risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers among postmenopausal women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based case-control study in the 3-county Seattle-Puget Sound metropolitan area. Participants were women aged 55 to 74 years, 880 of them with invasive ductal breast cancer, 1027 with invasive lobular breast cancer, and 856 with no cancer serving as controls. EXPOSURES: Recency and duration of use of antihypertensive medications. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risks of invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancers. RESULTS: Current use of calcium-channel blockers for 10 or more years was associated with higher risks of ductal breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9) (P= .04 for trend) and lobular breast cancer (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3) (P= .01 for trend). This relationship did not vary appreciably by type of calcium-channel blocker used (short-acting vs long-acting, dihydropyridines vs non-dihydropyridines). In contrast, use of diuretics, ß-blockers, and angiotensin II antagonists were not associated with risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While some studies have suggested a positive association between calcium-channel blocker use and breast cancer risk, this is the first study to observe that long-term current use of calcium-channel blockers in particular are associated with breast cancer risk. Additional research is needed to confirm this finding and to evaluate potential underlying biological mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Postmenopause , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/etiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Incidence , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , Washington/epidemiology
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 22(9): 1529-37, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23833125

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mechanistic studies largely support the chemopreventive potential of statins. However, results of epidemiologic studies investigating statin use and breast cancer risk have been inconsistent and lacked the ability to evaluate long-term statin use. METHODS: We used data from a population-based case-control study of breast cancer conducted in the Seattle-Puget Sound region to investigate the relationship between long-term statin use and breast cancer risk. Nine hundred sixteen invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 1,068 invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases in patients 55 to 74 years of age diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 were compared with 902 control women. All participants were interviewed in-person and data on hypercholesterolemia and all episodes of lipid-lowering medication use were collected through a structured questionnaire. We assessed the relationship between statin use and IDC and ILC risk using polytomous logistic regression. RESULTS: Current users of statins for 10 years or longer had a 1.83-fold increased risk of IDC [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-2.93] and a 1.97-fold increased risk of ILC (95% CI: 1.25-3.12) compared with never users of statins. Among women diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, current users of statins for 10 years or longer had more than double the risk of both IDC (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.17-3.57) and ILC (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.40-4.21) compared with never users. CONCLUSION: In this contemporary population-based case-control study, long-term use of statins was associated with increased risks of both IDC and ILC. IMPACT: Additional studies with similarly high frequencies of statin use for various durations are needed to confirm this novel finding.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Washington/epidemiology
6.
Int J Cancer ; 133(1): 201-13, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23280621

ABSTRACT

Given the important role of cell mediated immunity in viral clearance and control of premalignant lesions, we hypothesize that variation in the IL-12/IL-10 cytokine and cytokine receptor genes may influence cervical and vulvar cancer risk. We evaluated 76 tagSNPs from seven candidate genes (IL-10, IL-12A, IL-12B, IL-10RA, IL-10RB, IL-12RB1, and IL12RB2) in case-parent sets (n=43 cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), n=96 cervical adenocarcinoma, n=53 vulvar SCC), additional cases (n=356 cervical SCC, n=406 cervical adenocarcinoma, and n=473 vulvar SCC) and population based controls (1,111). We calculated log-additive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between tagSNP and cancer risk using a pseudo-likelihood based method which combined genotype information on cases, parents, and population controls. After correction for multiple comparisons, we identified several statistically significant SNP associations. Cervical SCC risk was associated with the minor alleles of the IL10RA rs9610 3' UTR SNP (OR=1.76, 95% CI=1.15-2.68) and two synonymous IL12RB2 SNPs (rs4297265, OR=0.46, 95% CI=0.26-0.82; rs2229546, OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.21-0.87). Cervical adenocarcinoma risk was associated with the minor alleles of the IL10RA rs4252314 intronic SNP (OR=2.23, 95% CI=1.26-3.96) and IL12RB1 rs11575934 non-synonymous SNP (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.12-2.05). Finally, the minor allele of the IL12B rs3181224 3' UTR SNP was associated with a reduced risk of vulvar SCC (OR=0.30, 95% CI=0.12-0.74). These results raise the possibility that a shift in the balance of the immune response due to genetic variants in key cytokine genes could influence the development of cervical and vulvar cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Interleukin-10/genetics , Interleukin-12/genetics , Nucleotides/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, Interleukin-10/genetics , Receptors, Interleukin-12/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Vulvar Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Interleukin-10 Receptor beta Subunit/genetics , Interleukin-12 Subunit p35/genetics , Interleukin-12 Subunit p40/genetics , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Parents , Research Design , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
7.
Int J Epidemiol ; 42(6): 1669-77, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23171871

ABSTRACT

The Skin Cancer after Organ Transplant (SCOT) study was designed to investigate the link between genus beta human papillomavirus (HPV) and squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC). We focused on a population receiving immunosuppressive therapy for extended periods, transplant patients, as they are at extremely high risk for developing SCSC. Two complementary projects were conducted in the Seattle area: (i) a retrospective cohort with interview data from 2004 recipients of renal or cardiac transplants between 1995 and 2010 and (ii) a prospective cohort with interview data from 328 people on the transplant waiting lists between 2009 and 2011. Within the retrospective cohort, we developed a nested case-control study (172 cases and 337 control subjects) to assess risk of SCSC associated with markers of HPV in SCSC tumour tissue and eyebrow hair bulb DNA (HPV genotypes) and blood (HPV antibodies). In the prospective cohort, 135 participants had a 1-year post-transplant visit and 71 completed a 2-year post-transplant visit. In both arms of the cohort, we collected samples to assess markers of HPV infection such as acquisition of new types, proportion positive for each type, persistence of types at consecutive visits and number of HPV types detected. In the prospective cohort, we will also examine these HPV markers in relation to levels of cell-mediated immunity. The goal of the SCOT study is to use the data we collected to gain a more complete understanding of the role of immune suppression in HPV kinetics and of genus beta HPV types in SCSC. For more information, please contact the principal investigator through the study website: http://www.fhcrc.org/science/phs/cerc/The_SCOT_Study.html.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Heart Transplantation , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Young Adult
8.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 137(2): 579-87, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23224237

ABSTRACT

Aspects of reproductive history are among the most well-established breast cancer risk factors. However, relatively little is known about how they influence risk of different molecular subtypes of breast cancer, particularly among younger women. Using data from a population-based case-control study of women 20-44 years of age, we assessed the relationships between various reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), triple-negative, and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers. Detailed reproductive histories were obtained through structured interviewer administered in-person questionnaires. Reproductive histories among control women (n = 941) were compared to those of ER+ cases (n = 781), triple-negative cases (n = 180), and HER2-overexpressing cases (n = 60) using polytomous logistic regression. Age at menarche, parity, and number of full-term pregnancies were similarly associated with risk of all three breast cancer subtypes. In contrast, age at first live birth, the interval between age at menarche and age at first birth, and breastfeeding were inversely associated with risk of triple-negative breast cancer (P values for trend 0.002, 0.006 and 0.018, respectively), but were not associated with risk of ER+ or HER2-overexpressing cancers. A strong inverse association between breastfeeding and risk of triple-negative breast cancer has now been consistently observed across numerous studies, and at present it is the most well-established protective factor for this aggressive and lethal form of breast cancer. Further studies clarifying the biological mechanisms underlying this relationship and confirming our results with respect to age at first birth and the interval between age at menarche and age at first birth are needed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Reproductive History , Adult , Breast Feeding , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Menarche , Oregon , Parity , Pregnancy , Young Adult
9.
Cancer Causes Control ; 24(2): 365-71, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23224328

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Use of specific antihypertensive medications (AHTs) has been hypothesized to increase breast cancer risk, but results across published studies are inconsistent. METHODS: We re-evaluated the relationship between AHT use and breast cancer risk in a prospective cohort of 3,201 women ≥65 years of age at recruitment now with more than double the length of follow-up (12 vs. 5 years) and substantially more breast cancer diagnoses (188 compared with 75 cases). We estimated the association between AHT use overall as well as use of specific formulations (based on data collected annually) and breast cancer risk using multivariate-adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: Compared with women who reported no use of AHTs, women who had used calcium channel blockers (CCB) within the past two years had a 1.6-fold increased risk of breast cancer (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.0-2.5), and in particular, recent users of immediate-release CCBs had a 2.4-fold increased risk (95 % CI: 1.3-4.5). Neither ever nor recent use of any other type of AHT was associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: While the observed association between immediate-release CCBs and breast cancer risk is based on a small sample size and needs to be interpreted cautiously, this result is consistent with others in the literature. However, given declines in use of these preparations in favor of sustained-release CCBs, which was not related to risk, the potential clinical and public health impact of this association is limited. This study also adds to the evidence that other commonly used AHTs are not strongly related to breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 135(3): 849-55, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22903686

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer survivors have a 60 % higher risk of developing a second primary asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC) compared to women's risk of developing a first primary breast cancer (FBC). However, little is known about how expression of tumor markers in first breast cancers influences CBC risk. We conducted a population-based nested case-control study among women 20-74 years of age diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1996 and 2008 in western Washington State to evaluate the association between their tumor's estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2-neu (HER2) expression, and risk of CBC. The study included 482 cases diagnosed with both a FBC and a CBC and 1,506 control women diagnosed only once with breast cancer identified through our local Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry. Compared to the women whose FBC was ER+/PR+, those with ER-/PR- first tumors had a 1.6-fold (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.2-2.3) increased risk of developing a CBC. When evaluated by joint ER/PR/HER2 status, compared to women with ER+/HER2- first cancers, those with HER2-overexpressing (ER-/HER2+) and triple-negative disease (ER-/PR-/HER2-) had 2.0-fold (95 % CI: 1.1-3.8) and 1.4-fold (95 % CI: 0.9-2.3) elevated risks of developing CBC, respectively. Beyond the known higher risks of mortality among patients diagnosed with more aggressive BC subtypes, here, we observe that they may also have increased risks of developing CBC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/metabolism , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy , Risk Factors , SEER Program , Washington , Young Adult
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 23(5): 671-81, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22418777

ABSTRACT

Racial differences in breast cancer risk, including the risks of hormone receptor subtypes of breast cancer, have been previously reported. We evaluated whether variation in genes related to estrogen metabolism (COMT, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, ESR1, GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, HSD17B1, SULT1A1, and UGT1A1) contributes to breast cancer risk and/or racial differences in risk within the CARE study, a multi-centered, population-based case-control study of breast cancer. Genetic variation was assessed as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotypes, and SNP-hormone therapy (HT) interactions within a subset of 1,644 cases and 1,451 controls, including 949 Black women (493 cases and 456 controls), sampled from the CARE study population. No appreciable associations with breast cancer risk were detected for single SNPs or haplotypes in women overall. We detected SNP-HT interactions in women overall within CYP1B1 (rs1800440; p (het) = 0.003) and within CYP17A1 (rs743572; p (het) = 0.009) in which never users of HT were at a decreased risk of breast cancer, while ever users were at a non-significant increased risk. When investigated among racial groups, we detected evidence of an SNP-HT interaction with CYP1B1 in White women (p value = 0.02) and with CYP17A1 in Black women (p value = 0.04). This analysis suggests that HT use may modify the effect of variation in estrogen-related genes on breast cancer risk, which may affect Black and White women to a different extent.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Estrogens/genetics , Estrogens/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Black People , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gene-Environment Interaction , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Variation , Humans , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Risk Factors , White People
12.
Cancer Res ; 72(8): 2028-35, 2012 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22369929

ABSTRACT

Depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is an injectable contraceptive that contains the same progestin as the menopausal hormone therapy regimen found to increase breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial. However, few studies have evaluated the relationship between DMPA use and breast cancer risk. Here, we conducted a population-based case-control study among 1,028 women ages 20 to 44 years to assess the association between DMPA use and breast cancer risk. Detailed information on DMPA use and other relevant covariates was obtained through structured interviewer-administered in-person questionnaires, and unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between various aspects of DMPA use and breast cancer risk. We found that recent DMPA use for 12 months or longer was associated with a 2.2-fold [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-4.2] increased risk of invasive breast cancer. This risk did not vary appreciably by tumor stage, size, hormone receptor expression, or histologic subtype. Although breast cancer is rare among young women and the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with DMPA appears to dissipate after discontinuation of use, our findings emphasize the importance of identifying the potential risks associated with specific forms of contraceptives given the number of available alternatives.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Risk Factors , Young Adult
13.
Contraception ; 85(4): 342-50, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22067757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While evidence on the association between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer generally suggests little or no increased risk, the question of whether breast cancer risk varies by OC formulation remains controversial. Few studies have examined this issue because large samples and extensive OC histories are required. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from a multicenter, population-based, case-control investigation. Women aged 35-64 years were interviewed. To explore the association between OC formulation and breast cancer risk, we used conditional logistic regression to derive adjusted odds ratios, and we used likelihood ratio tests for heterogeneity to assess whether breast cancer risk varied by OC formulation. Key OC exposure variables were ever use, current or former use, duration of use and time since last use. To strengthen inferences about specific formulations, we restricted most analyses to the 2282 women with breast cancer and the 2424 women without breast cancer who reported no OC use or exclusive use of one OC. RESULTS: Thirty-eight formulations were reported by the 2674 women who used one OC; most OC formulations were used by only a few women. We conducted multivariable analyses on the 10 formulations that were each used by at least 50 women and conducted supplemental analyses on selected formulations of interest based on recent research. Breast cancer risk did not vary significantly by OC formulation, and no formulation was associated with a significantly increased breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results add to the small body of literature on the relationship between OC formulation and breast cancer. Our data are reassuring in that, among women 35-64 years of age, we found no evidence that specific OC formulations increase breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Risk , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 20(12): 2560-71, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21960690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inherited predisposition may be associated with distinctive breast cancer phenotypes and/or mortality. Past studies have had inconsistent results and little is known about the contributions of screening and treatment. METHODS: Within a population-based cohort of 1,260 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer before age 46, we assessed how family history of breast cancer relates to mortality and tumor characteristics. Analyses were repeated excluding BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers. Medical records were reviewed for treatment history and tumors were centrally reviewed and tested. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess the risk of dying in relation to family history; logistic regression was used to assess the association of family history to tumor characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with women with no family history, women with first-degree family history of breast cancer had a 40% reduction (95% CI: 0.5-0.8) in the risk of dying. Mortality in women with only a second-degree family history was similar to those with no family history. The risk of dying was further reduced in those with a greater number of affected relatives. These relationships did not seem to be attributable to differences in screening, detection method, or treatment. Tumors in women with a first-degree family history had generally more favorable prognostic profiles. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that breast cancer patients with a first-degree family history, compared with their counterparts without such a profile, may have a better prognosis. IMPACT: These findings support the need for future research directed at replicating these results and identifying factors underlying this possible relationship.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Family Health , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 20(2): 379-88, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21212063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies indicate that women with menopausal symptoms have lower estrogen levels because they go through menopause as compared with women who do not experience them. Given the central role of hormones in the etiology of breast cancer, a link between menopausal symptoms and breast cancer is plausible. However, no prior studies have evaluated the association between menopausal symptoms and breast cancer risk. METHODS: Utilizing data from a population-based case-control study we examined associations between menopausal symptoms and risks of different histologic types of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. We calculated multivariate adjusted odds ratios (OR) using polytomous logistic regression and evaluated several potential effect modifiers. RESULTS: Women who ever experienced menopausal symptoms had lower risks of invasive ductal carcinoma [(IDC) OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7], invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC, OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.8), and invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma (IDLC, OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.4-1.2), and these reductions in risk were independent of recency and timing of hormone therapy use, age at menopause, and body mass index. Increasing intensity of hot flushes among women who ever experienced hot flushes was also associated with decreasing risks of all three breast cancer subtypes (P values for trend all ≤ 0.017). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report that women who ever experienced menopausal symptoms have a substantially reduced risk of breast cancer, and that severity of hot flushes is also inversely associated with risk. IMPACT: If confirmed, these findings could enhance our understanding of breast cancer etiology and factors potentially relevant to prevention.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology , Menopause , Postmenopause , Aged , Body Composition , Body Mass Index , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hot Flashes , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
16.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 126(3): 749-61, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20878463

ABSTRACT

Multiple past studies have reported a reduced risk of breast cancer-related mortality (BCM) in relation to pre-diagnostic use of hormone therapy (HT); however, the extent to which this reduction is due to heightened screening or tumor biology is unknown. Using a population-based cohort of 1,911 post-menopausal women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at ages 45-79 from 1993 to 1999, we investigated the extent to which the reduced risk in BCM observed in relation to HT might be explained by screening patterns or tumor features. Estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) use was associated with a decreased risk of BCM (after adjustment for age, study, mammography, stage, and treatment), but only among older women (ever use: ≥ 65 years: HR = 0.45 [95% CI 0.26-0.80]; <65 years: HR = 1.03 [95% CI 0.60-1.79]). Estrogen-alone therapy (ET) use was not associated with risk of BCM (ever use: ≥ 65 years: HR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.51-1.12]; <65 years: HR = 1.20 [95% CI 0.71-2.02]). HT users had a much greater frequency of mammography (P value <0.001). EPT use was associated with tumor characteristics related to improved prognosis in older women after adjustment for screening, including an inverse association with poorly differentiated tumors (OR = 0.57 [95% CI 0.38-0.85]) and an association with lobular tumors (OR = 1.68 [95% CI 1.07-2.65]). Beyond the influence of EPT use on screening uptake, these data indicate that the improved survival associated with pre-diagnostic EPT use may be due in part to the development of more favorable tumor characteristics.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Hormone Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Hormones/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Aged , Cell Differentiation , Estrogens/metabolism , Female , Humans , Mammography/methods , Menopause , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Progestins/metabolism , Risk
17.
Ann Epidemiol ; 21(1): 53-5, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21130370

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine whether smoking during first pregnancy, a time of potential vulnerability to tobacco mutagens, is associated with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study within a cohort of Washington State residents with first deliveries during 1984-1999, identified in birth and fetal death records. Linkage to population-based cancer registry data identified 1,099 women in the cohort aged 65 years and younger diagnosed with breast cancer in 1985-2000. Controls (N=10,922) were matched by year and age of first delivery, race/ethnicity, and birth outcome. Maternal smoking and other variables characterizing the pregnancy were obtained from birth and fetal death records. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The adjusted risk ratio for breast cancer was 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9, among women who smoked during their pregnancy compared with similar women who did not smoke. When the sample was restricted to known state residents at the time of the matched case's diagnosis, there was no association (risk ratio 1.0; 0.8-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not suggest that cigarette smoking during first pregnancy increases the risk of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Pregnancy , Smoking/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk , Washington/epidemiology
18.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 125(2): 545-51, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20625814

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer survivors have a substantially higher risk of developing a second primary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) compared to the risk of breast cancer among women in the general population. While data regarding the relationship between diabetes and breast cancer incidence are inconsistent, diabetes is more clearly linked to an elevated risk of all-cause mortality among breast cancer survivors. However, no prior studies have assessed its impact on CBC risk. We assessed the relationship between diabetes, and CBC risk in a population-based nested case-control study consisting of women 40-79 years of age diagnosed with a first primary ER-positive invasive breast cancer. It included 322 women who developed a second primary CBC and 616-matched control women diagnosed only with a first breast cancer. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify associations between diabetes and CBC risk. Compared to women without a history of diabetes, diabetics had a 2.2-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.6] increased risk of CBC. This risk was more pronounced among women diagnosed with their first breast cancer before age 60 years (odds ratio, OR = 11.5, 95% CI 2.4-54.5), compared to those diagnosed at age 60 years or older (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.7, P for interaction = 0.011). Diabetics diagnosed with breast cancer appear to have an elevated risk of CBC. This is the first study to report this relationship, but if confirmed efforts to insure that diabetic breast cancer survivors are carefully screened for second breast cancers may be warranted.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Second Primary/complications , Odds Ratio , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SEER Program
19.
Fertil Steril ; 94(7): 2580-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20434152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal infertility treatment is associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study using linked birth certificate-hospital discharge data. SETTING: Washington State. PATIENT(S): Live-born singleton infants conceived with infertility treatment between 2003 and 2006 (n = 2,182) and a random sample of live-born singleton infants conceived spontaneously, frequency matched by birth year (n = 10,989). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mantel-Haenszel adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for low birth weight, delivery at <37 weeks, small for gestational age infants, any malformation, placenta previa, and placenta abruptio. RESULT(S): Women with infertility treatment were at increased risk of placental abnormalities, including placenta abruptio (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5) and placenta previa (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.7). Their infants were more likely to be delivered at <37 weeks (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9) or weigh <2500 g (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7); however, they were not at increased risk of being small for gestational age. An increased risk of malformations was observed in infants born to older women with infertility treatment, but not to younger women. CONCLUSION(S): Women using infertility treatment are at increased risk for delivering preterm, placenta previa, and placenta abruptio. Studies with measurement of specific infertility treatments will help identify the mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Infertility/therapy , Parturition , Pregnancy Outcome , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Adult , Cohort Studies , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Congenital Abnormalities/etiology , Female , Fetal Death/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/etiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Parturition/physiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
20.
Am J Epidemiol ; 170(10): 1241-9, 2009 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19846565

ABSTRACT

The relevance of progesterone to breast carcinogenesis is highlighted by evidence indicating that use of combined estrogen-progesterone therapy (EPT) is more strongly related to breast cancer risk than is use of unopposed estrogen therapy. However, few investigators have assessed how genetic variation in progesterone-related genes modifies the effect of EPT on risk. In an analysis combining data from 2 population-based case-control studies of postmenopausal breast cancer (1,296 cases and 1,055 controls) conducted in Washington State in 1997-1999 and 2000-2004, the authors evaluated how 51 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 7 progesterone-related genes (AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3, CYP3A4, SRD5A1, SRD5A2, and PGR) influenced breast cancer risk. There was no appreciable association with breast cancer risk overall for any single nucleotide polymorphism. For rs2854482 in AKR1C2, carrying 1 or 2 A alleles was associated with a 2.0-fold increased breast cancer risk in EPT users (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 4.0) but not in never users (P(heterogeneity) = 0.03). For rs12387 in AKR1C3, the presence of 1 or 2 G alleles was associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk among EPT users (95% confidence interval: 1.1, 2.2) but not in never users (P(heterogeneity) = 0.02). Interpretation of these subgroup associations must await the results of similar studies conducted in other populations.


Subject(s)
3-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenases/genetics , Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics , Aged , Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3 , Breast Neoplasms/enzymology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Genetic Variation , Humans , Odds Ratio , Postmenopause , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Washington/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...