ABSTRACT
GOALS: Evaluate patient tolerance and acceptance of a sodium phosphate (NaP) tablet purgative compared with a 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution. BACKGROUND: Characteristics and side effects of bowel purgatives deter patients from undergoing screening colonoscopy. Published data demonstrated comparable bowel cleansing with NaP tablets and a 4-L PEG solution in 2 phase for 3 studies. This report presents data on patient tolerability and acceptance. STUDY: Two identically designed, randomized, investigator-blinded, and multicenter trials were performed. Tolerability and patient acceptance were based on purgative regimen compliance, incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, and patient responses to questionnaires. RESULTS: Eight hundred forty-five patients were assessed (420 and 425 in the tablet and PEG solution groups, respectively). Patient compliance with the tablet regimen was greater: 94% of patients took all the tablets compared with 57% completing the PEG solution regimen (P<0.0001). Nausea, vomiting, and bloating occurred significantly less often in patients taking NaP tablets (P<0.0001). Among patients taking tablets, 88.4% rated them "easy" or "slightly difficult" to take, compared with 60.6% of patients taking the PEG solution. The preparation's taste was rated "barely tolerable" or "not tolerable" by 1% of patients treated with NaP tablets and 23.6% treated with PEG solution. Drinking the required volume of clear liquid for the tablet or PEG preparation was rated "easy" or "slightly difficult" by 92.2% and 66.9% of patients, respectively. Almost all (90.7%) patients taking the tablets indicated they would take the same preparation in the future, compared with 67.1% of patients taking the PEG solution (P<0.0001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability and patient acceptance of a NaP tablet purgative were superior to 4-L PEG solution.
Subject(s)
Cathartics/administration & dosage , Colonic Diseases/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Drug Carriers/administration & dosage , Enema/methods , Phosphates/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The bowel purgative Visicol contains microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) residue, which may impair full visibility during a colonoscopy. An MCC residue-free sodium phosphate (RF-NaP; OsmoPrep) tablet was developed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate appropriate RF-NaP dosing. DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized, investigator-blinded study. SETTING: Six research centers in the United States. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing a colonoscopy received Visicol (n = 34) or 1 of 6 RF-NaP regimens administered as either split (S) dosing (the evening before and the day of colonoscopy) or evening-only (E) dosing. Dosing regimens for RF-NaP were 40 tablets S, 3 every 15 minutes (n = 33); 40 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 32 tablets E, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 32 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 36); 28 tablets E, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34); 28 tablets S, 4 every 15 minutes (n = 34). Visicol was administered as 40 tablets S, 3 every 15 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall colon cleansing (OCC) was assessed by a physician questionnaire (4-point scale, based on colonic contents). An OCC rating of "excellent" or "good" was considered a response. Safety measures were also monitored. RESULTS: Split dosing with RF-NaP was associated with high OCC and achieved response rates of 90%, 97%, and 100% for 28, 32, and 40 tablets, respectively, compared with 86% for Visicol. In addition, RF-NaP evening-only regimen response rates were 90% (32 tablets) and 72% (28 tablets). Transient shifts in electrolyte levels were reduced, and GI adverse events were less common with lower RF-NaP dose regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of RF-NaP retains the benefits of a tablet purgative but eliminates MCC issues. Split dosing and 32-tablet evening-only dosing of RF-NaP tablets were efficacious and well tolerated, and split dosing of RF-NaP tablets is recommended.
