ABSTRACT
This paper aims to evaluate and compare the driving performances achieved with a power wheelchair using a standard joystick versus a novel gaze-based technology. The gaze-based interface, called RoboEYE, involves a novel paradigm of computer interaction that handles the receipt of information from an eye tracker, using it as a continuous input for wheelchair navigation. A pool of 36 subjects has tested both technologies in a circuit designed considering the Wheelchair Skill Test. The experimental analysis involved evaluations of specific metrics of motion and the submission of questionnaires to collect required information about perceived feelings and mental workload. The joystick proved to be the best driving interface. It turned out to be more accurate and efficient than the gaze-based solution. However, the latter achieved only small differences in driving kinematics. These differences can be considered negligible from an operational point of view, offering a driving experience similar to that achievable with the joystick. Testers reported no particular stress, fatigue, or frustration when switching from one interface to another. These elements suggest that the proposed gaze-based solution is an appropriate alternative for a technology transition driven by a pathological change in the user's condition.
