Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
EClinicalMedicine ; 31: 100689, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is of high urgency. Here the safety and immunogenicity induced by a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full length spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 are described. METHODS: INO-4800 was evaluated in two groups of 20 participants, receiving either 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg of vaccine intradermally followed by CELLECTRA® EP at 0 and 4 weeks. Thirty-nine subjects completed both doses; one subject in the 2.0 mg group discontinued trial participation prior to receiving the second dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04336410. FINDINGS: The median age was 34.5, 55% (22/40) were men and 82.5% (33/40) white. Through week 8, only 6 related Grade 1 adverse events in 5 subjects were observed. None of these increased in frequency with the second administration. No serious adverse events were reported. All 38 subjects evaluable for immunogenicity had cellular and/or humoral immune responses following the second dose of INO-4800. By week 6, 95% (36/38) of the participants seroconverted based on their responses by generating binding (ELISA) and/or neutralizing antibodies (PRNT IC50), with responder geometric mean binding antibody titers of 655.5 [95% CI (255.6, 1681.0)] and 994.2 [95% CI (395.3, 2500.3)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. For neutralizing antibody, 78% (14/18) and 84% (16/19) generated a response with corresponding geometric mean titers of 102.3 [95% CI (37.4, 280.3)] and 63.5 [95% CI (39.6, 101.8)], in the respective groups. By week 8, 74% (14/19) and 100% (19/19) of subjects generated T cell responses by IFN-É£ ELISpot assay with the median SFU per 106 PBMC of 46 [95% CI (21.1, 142.2)] and 71 [95% CI (32.2, 194.4)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. Flow cytometry demonstrated a T cell response, dominated by CD8+ T cells co-producing IFN-É£ and TNF-α, without increase in IL-4. INTERPRETATION: INO-4800 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability and was immunogenic in 100% (38/38) of the vaccinated subjects by eliciting either or both humoral or cellular immune responses. FUNDING: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).

2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 34(2): 186-94, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25741971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Widespread use of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in children has led to significant reduction in pneumococcal disease in children and adults. However, diseases caused by serotypes not included in PCV7 have increased. A 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) containing serotypes in PCV7 and 8 additional serotypes (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, 19A, 22F, 33F) was developed and evaluated in toddlers 12 to 15 months of age. METHODS: Ninety toddlers who completed an infant series with PCV7 received a single dose of either aluminum-adjuvanted PCV15, nonadjuvanted PCV15, or PCV7. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected for 14 days postvaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) were collected for 30 days postvaccination. Solicited AEs included local (pain/tenderness, swelling, nodule and redness) and systemic (fatigue, arthralgia and myalgia) AEs. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and opsonophagocytic (OPA) responses were measured immediately prior and 30 days postvaccination. RESULTS: Incidences of local and systemic AEs were comparable across vaccine groups. The majority of reported events, regardless of vaccine received, were transient and of mild to moderate intensity. No clinically significant differences were observed when comparing duration and severity of AEs. No vaccine-related SAEs or discontinuations from the study due to AEs were reported. Pneumococcal IgG concentrations and OPA titers increased postvaccination, with appreciable fold rises for all serotypes. Antibody levels were comparable between both PCV15 formulations and generally comparable to PCV7 for the shared serotypes. CONCLUSION: Both formulations of PCV15 display acceptable safety profiles and induce IgG and OPA responses to all vaccine serotypes.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Opsonin Proteins/blood , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Infant , Male , Phagocytosis , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Conjugate/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects , Vaccines, Conjugate/immunology
3.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A106-13, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520119

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the immunogenicity of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) in two GAVI-eligible Asian countries, Bangladesh and Vietnam, nested in a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial conducted over a two-year period from 2007 through 2009. METHODS: 2036 infants were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive three oral doses of PRV or placebo approximately at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Concomitant use of EPI vaccines, including oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine, was encouraged in accordance to the local EPI schedule. A total of 303 infants were evaluated for immunogenicity and blood samples were collected before the first dose (pD1) and approximately 14 days following the third dose (PD3). The seroresponse rates (≥3-fold rise from pD1 to PD3) and geometric mean titers (GMTs) were measured for anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A (IgA) and serum neutralizing antibody (SNA) to human rotavirus serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4, and P1A[8], respectively. RESULTS: Nearly 88% of the subjects showed a ≥3-fold increase in serum anti-rotavirus IgA response in the analysis of the two countries combined. When analyzed separately, the IgA response was lower in Bangladeshi children (78.1% [95% CI: 66.0, 87.5]) than in Vietnamese children (97.0% [95% CI: 89.6, 99.6]), with a PD3 GMT of 29.1 (units/mL) and 158.5 (units/mL), respectively. In the combined population, the SNA responses to the individual serotypes tested ranged from 10 (G3) to 50 (G1) percentage points lower than the responses shown in the developed countries. However, the SNA response to G3 in Vietnamese subjects was 37.3% (95% CI: 25.8, 50.0), which was similar to the G3 response rate in developed countries. CONCLUSIONS: Three oral doses of PRV were immunogenic in two GAVI-eligible Asian countries: Bangladesh and Vietnam. The GMTs of both the serum anti-rotavirus IgA and SNA responses were generally higher in Vietnamese than in Bangladeshi children. The SNA responses varied by individual serotypes and were lower than the results from developed countries. The clinical significance of these observations is not understood because an immune correlate of protection has not been established.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bangladesh , Developing Countries , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus/isolation & purification , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Serotyping , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vietnam
4.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A159-66, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical severity scoring systems are used in rotavirus vaccine efficacy and effectiveness studies to define the primary endpoint, severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE). Understanding how scoring systems perform in diverse settings is critical for proper design and interpretation. This investigation aims to understand how the Vesikari scoring system (VSS) and Clark scoring system (CSS) categorize severe disease among children under 2 years of age using data from two Phase III efficacy trials conducted in five developing countries in Africa and Asia. METHODS: Signs and symptoms were collected on trial participants who presented to a medical facility with study-defined gastroenteritis. Severity scores were calculated using pre-established VSS and CSS criteria and compared to identify differences in the proportions of severe RVGE within regions and sites, and by gender and age. RESULTS: In Africa and Asia, 40.6% and 56.0% of rotavirus-positive episodes were severe according to the VSS, while 9.5% and 6.3% of episodes were severe according to the CSS (Fisher's Exact, p ≤ 0.001). Using the mean scores in these trials (VSS: ≥ 10 Africa, ≥ 11 Asia; CSS: Africa and Asia ≥ 10) as the severity thresholds, agreement between scoring system severity classifications improved substantially within each region (Africa: kappa = 0.67; Asia: kappa = 0.78) as compared to the original severity classification (Africa: kappa = 0.27; Asia: kappa = 0.10). Using the mean score, 17.1% and 9.5% of severe VSS cases in Africa and Asia, respectively, were classified as not severe according to the CSS and 14.7% and 9.5% of severe CSS cases in Africa and Asia were classified as not severe according to the VSS. CONCLUSION: The two scoring systems performed differently among developing country populations in Africa and Asia, with the VSS classifying more cases as severe in both regions. One accurate and reliable scoring system should be developed and implemented for all trials so that results may be more comparable.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Africa , Asia , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage
5.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A52-60, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) is a leading cause of death in African children. The efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) against severe RVGE evaluated in Ghana, Kenya, and Mali in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, showed a combined regional efficacy of 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1,54.7) in nearly 2 years of follow-up. This report concentrates on the Kenya findings. METHODS: Infants received 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6-, 10-, and 14-weeks of age. HIV testing was offered to all participants. Data on illness symptoms and signs were collected upon presentation to healthcare facilities, where stools were collected, and analyzed by rotavirus-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The primary endpoint was severe RVGE (Vesikari score ≥ 11), occurring ≥ 14 days following the third dose. At monthly home visits, symptoms of illnesses during the past 2 weeks were solicited and limited physical exams were performed; dehydration was defined by WHO's Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. FINDINGS: Vaccine efficacy (VE) against severe RVGE through nearly 2 years of follow-up among 1308 Kenyan children was 63.9% (95% CI: -5.9,89.8). Through the first year of life, VE against severe RVGE was 83.4% (95% CI: 25.5,98.2). From home visits, VE against all-cause gastroenteritis with severe dehydration was 34.4% (95% CI: 5.3,54.6) through the first year and 29.7% (95% CI: 2.5,49.3) through the entire follow-up period. The reduction in incidence of gastroenteritis with severe dehydration in the community during the first year of life (19.0 cases/100 person-years) was almost six times greater than the reduction in severe RVGE presenting to the clinic (3.3/100 person-years). Oral rehydration solution use was lower among PRV recipients (VE 23.1%, 95% CI: 8.8,35.1). An estimated 41% of gastroenteritis with severe dehydration in the first year reported at home was rotavirus-related. CONCLUSIONS: PRV significantly reduced severe RVGE in Kenya. The impact of PRV might be greatest in rural Africa in protecting the many children who develop severe gastroenteritis and cannot access health facilities.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Double-Blind Method , Feces/virology , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/pathology , Genotype , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus/genetics , Rotavirus/isolation & purification , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
6.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A79-85, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520141

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq(®), was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial conducted (April 2007-March 2009) in 3 low-income countries in Africa: Ghana, Kenya, and Mali. In total, 5468 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age; concomitant administration with routine EPI vaccines, including OPV, was allowed. HIV-infected infants were not excluded. The primary endpoint, vaccine efficacy (VE) against severe-rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE), as measured by Vesikari scoring system (VSS, score ≥11), from ≥14 days following Dose 3 through a follow-up period of nearly 2 years in the combined 3 African countries, and secondary endpoints by total follow-up period have been previously reported. In this study, we report post hoc subgroup analyses on secondary endpoints of public health importance. VE against RVGE of any severity was 49.2% (95%CI: 29.9, 63.5) through the first year of life and 30.5% (95%CI: 16.7, 42.2) through the complete follow-up period. VE against severe-gastroenteritis of any etiology was 21.5% (95%CI: <0, 38.4) through the first year of life and 10.6% (95%CI: <0, 24.9) through the complete follow-up period. Through the complete follow-up period, VE against severe-RVGE caused by (i) vaccine-contained G and P types (G1-G4, P1A[8]), (ii) non-vaccine G types (G8, G9, G10), and (iii) non-vaccine P types (P1B[4], P2A[6]) was 34.0% (95%CI:11.2, 51.2), 81.8% (95%CI:16.5, 98.0) and 40.7% (95%CI:8.4, 62.1), respectively. There was a trend towards higher VE with higher disease severity, although in some cases the numbers were small. In African countries with high under-5 mortality rates, PRV significantly reduced RVGE through nearly 2 years of follow-up; more modest reductions were observed against gastroenteritis of any etiology. PRV provides protection against severe-RVGE caused by diverse rotavirus genotypes, including those not contained in the vaccine.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/pathology , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
7.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A94-100, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520143

ABSTRACT

An efficacy clinical trial with pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq(®), was conducted at Matlab field site of ICDDR,B, Bangladesh from March 2007 to March 2009. The methodology, including operation logistics, and lessons-learned are described in this report. Vaccination was organized at 41 fixed-site clinics twice/month. A total of 1136 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6-, 10-, and 14-weeks of age with routine vaccines of the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) schedule. Twelve field-workers routinely visited study participants for safety and efficacy follow-up. The study was conducted following good clinical practices and maintaining cold-chain requirements. There were no temperature deviations of clinical vaccine supplies. Data entry was done using the source documents to a central database developed by the sponsor which was linked to web. Among enrolled infants, 1128 (99.3%) received 3 doses of PRV/placebo and efficacy follow-up was conducted for a median of 554 days. For the evaluation of immunogenicity, blood samples were collected from 150 participants predose 1 and from 147 (98%) of the same participants post dose 3. Stool samples were collected from 778 (99.9%) acute gastroenteritis episodes among children who reported to diarrhoea treatment centres. Thirty-nine serious adverse events, including 6 deaths, occurred among study participants. The efficacy of PRV against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 42.7% through the entire follow-up period; serum anti-rotavirus IgA response was 78.1%. Inclement weather, difficult transportation, and movement of study participants were some of the challenges identified. This is the first vaccine trial in rural Bangladesh with online data entry. The study was well accepted in the community and was completed successfully.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/supply & distribution , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Refrigeration/methods , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/supply & distribution
8.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A86-93, 2012 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520142

ABSTRACT

We recently completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trial of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) in three African countries, Ghana, Kenya, and Mali, from April 2007 to March 2009. The immunogenicity of PRV in African infants is described. In total, 5468 infants were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 doses of PRV or placebo at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Breastfeeding and concomitant administration of EPI vaccines, including OPV, were allowed, and HIV-infected infants were not excluded. Immunogenicity of PRV was assessed by measuring serum anti-rotavirus IgA responses, as well as serum neutralization antibody (SNA) to the human rotavirus serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4 and P1A[8] in approximately 150 infants per country. Sera were collected pre-dose 1 (pD1) and approximately 14 days post-dose 3 (PD3) for immunological analysis. For the sero-response rates (≥ 3-fold rise from pD1 to PD3), the number of subjects evaluable included those with both pD1 and PD3 data available. PRV was immunogenic in African children and significantly reduced severe RVGE in African children through the first two years of life. The pooled anti-rotavirus IgA sero-response rate was 78.3%, with consistent rates in each of the African sites: 73.8% (Kenya), 78.9% (Ghana), and 82.5% (Mali); but generally lower than that reported in Europe and USA. PD3 GMTs (28.2 dilution-units) were 5-10 times lower than those assessed in subjects in clinical trials in developed countries. SNA responses to human rotavirus serotypes G1-G4 and P1A[8] ranged from 6.3% (G3) to 26.5% (G4). PD3 SNA GMTs to G1 and P1A[8] were 4-fold and 3-fold lower respectively, when compared to the corresponding GMTs in subjects who received PRV in similar studies conducted in developed countries. PRV was immunogenic in African infants, and the anti-rotavirus IgA sero-response rates were similar across all three African sites although lower than those observed in Europe and USA. While immune correlates of protection have not been established for rotavirus, the findings are consistent with lower efficacy rates demonstrated during this trial. Further investigation is needed to understand the reason for the lower immunogenicity observed.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Ghana/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Mali/epidemiology , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
9.
Hum Vaccin ; 7(5): 563-8, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21441783

ABSTRACT

Post-hoc analyses of the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST) were conducted to determine whether the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) confers early protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) before completion of the 3-dose regimen. To evaluate the efficacy of RV5 between doses in reducing the rates of RVGE-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in infants who ultimately received all 3 doses of RV5/placebo, events occurring from 2 weeks after the first and second doses to receipt of the subsequent dose (Analysis A) and events occurring from 2 weeks after the first and second doses to 2 weeks after the subsequent dose (Analysis B) were analyzed. In Analysis A, RV5 reduced the rates of combined hospitalizations and ED visits for G1-G4 RVGE or RVGE regardless of serotype between doses 1 and 2 by 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72-100%) or 82% (95% CI: 39-97%), respectively, and between doses 2 and 3, RV5 reduced the rates of combined hospitalizations and ED visits for G1-G4 RVGE or RVGE regardless of serotype by 91% (95% CI: 63-99%) or 84% (95% CI: 54-96%), respectively. Similar rate reductions were observed in Analysis B. These data suggest that RV5 provides a high level of protection between doses against hospitalizations and ED visits for RVGE starting as early as 14 days after the first dose.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Immunization, Secondary/methods , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/immunology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization, Secondary/adverse effects , Infant , Placebos/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
10.
Pharm Stat ; 10(4): 332-40, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21061417

ABSTRACT

The development of a new pneumococcal conjugate vaccine involves assessing the responses of the new serotypes included in the vaccine. The World Health Organization guidance states that the response from each new serotype in the new vaccine should be compared with the aggregate response from the existing vaccine to evaluate non-inferiority. However, no details are provided on how to define and estimate the aggregate response and what methods to use for non-inferiority comparisons. We investigate several methods to estimate the aggregate response based on binary data including simple average, model-based, and lowest response methods. The response of each new serotype is then compared with the estimated aggregate response for non-inferiority. The non-inferiority test p-value and confidence interval are obtained from Miettinen and Nurminen's method, using an effective sample size. The methods are evaluated using simulations and demonstrated with a real clinical trial example.


Subject(s)
Drug Design , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Computer Simulation , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Models, Statistical , Pneumococcal Infections/immunology , Sample Size , Serotyping , Vaccines, Conjugate/immunology
11.
Lancet ; 376(9741): 606-14, 2010 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20692030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus gastroenteritis causes many deaths in infants in sub-Saharan Africa. Because rotavirus vaccines have proven effective in developed countries but had not been tested in developing countries, we assessed efficacy of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against severe disease in Ghana, Kenya, and Mali between April, 2007, and March, 2009. METHODS: In our multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, undertaken in rural areas of Ghana and Kenya and an urban area of Mali, we randomly assigned infants aged 4-12 weeks without symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders in a 1:1 ratio to receive three oral doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine 2 mL or placebo at around 6 weeks, 10 weeks, and 14 weeks of age. Infants with HIV infection were not excluded. Randomisation was done by computer-generated randomisation sequence in blocks of six. We obtained data for gastrointestinal symptoms from parents on presentation to health-care facilities and clinical data were obtained prospectively by clinicians. The primary endpoint was severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (Vesikari score >or=11), detected by enzyme immunoassay, arising 14 days or more after the third dose of placebo or vaccine to end of study (March 31, 2009; around 21 months of age). Analysis was per protocol; infants who received scheduled doses of vaccine or placebo without intervening laboratory-confirmed naturally occurring rotavirus disease earlier than 14 days after the third dose and had complete clinical and laboratory results were included in the analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00362648. FINDINGS: 5468 infants were randomly assigned to receive pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (n=2733) or placebo (n=2735). 2357 infants assigned to vaccine and 2348 assigned to placebo were included in the per-protocol analysis. 79 cases of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis were reported in 2610.6 person-years in the vaccine group, compared with 129 cases in 2585.9 person-years in the placebo group, resulting in a vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis of 39.3% (95% CI 19.1-54.7, p=0.0003 for efficacy >0%). Median follow-up in both groups was 527 days starting 14 days after the third dose of vaccine or placebo was given. 42 (1.5%) of 2723 infants assigned to receive vaccine and 45 (1.7%) of 2724 infants assigned to receive placebo had a serious adverse event within 14 days of any dose. The most frequent serious adverse event was gastroenteritis (vaccine 17 [0.6%]; placebo 17 [0.6%]). INTERPRETATION: Pentavalent rotavirus vaccine is effective against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in the first 2 years of life in African countries with high mortality in infants younger than 5 years. We support WHO's recommendation for adoption of rotavirus vaccine into national expanded programmes on immunisation in Africa. FUNDING: PATH (GAVI Alliance grant) and Merck.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Africa South of the Sahara , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Double-Blind Method , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Rotavirus/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
12.
Lancet ; 376(9741): 615-23, 2010 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20692031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus vaccine has proved effective for prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developed countries, but no efficacy studies have been done in developing countries in Asia. We assessed the clinical efficacy of live oral pentavalent rotavirus vaccine for prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in Bangladesh and Vietnam. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, undertaken in rural Matlab, Bangladesh, and urban and periurban Nha Trang, Vietnam, infants aged 4-12 weeks without symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three oral doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine 2 mL or placebo at around 6 weeks, 10 weeks, and 14 weeks of age, in conjunction with routine infant vaccines including oral poliovirus vaccine. Randomisation was done by computer-generated randomisation sequence in blocks of six. Episodes of gastroenteritis in infants who presented to study medical facilities were reported by clinical staff and from parent recollection. The primary endpoint was severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (Vesikari score >or=11) arising 14 days or more after the third dose of placebo or vaccine to end of study (March 31, 2009; around 21 months of age). Analysis was per protocol; infants who received scheduled doses of vaccine or placebo without intervening laboratory-confirmed naturally occurring rotavirus disease earlier than 14 days after the third dose and had complete clinical and laboratory results were included in the analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00362648. FINDINGS: 2036 infants were randomly assigned to receive pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (n=1018) or placebo (n=1018). 991 infants assigned to pentavalent rotavirus vaccine and 978 assigned to placebo were included in the per-protocol analysis. Median follow up from 14 days after the third dose of placebo or vaccine until final disposition was 498 days (IQR 480-575). 38 cases of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (Vesikari score >or=11) were reported during more than 1197 person-years of follow up in the vaccine group, compared with 71 cases in more than 1156 person years in the placebo group, resulting in a vaccine efficacy of 48.3% (95% CI 22.3-66.1) against severe disease (p=0.0005 for efficacy >0%) during nearly 2 years of follow-up. 25 (2.5%) of 1017 infants assigned to receive vaccine and 20 (2.0%) of 1018 assigned to receive placebo had a serious adverse event within 14 days of any dose. The most frequent serious adverse event was pneumonia (vaccine 12 [1.2%]; placebo 15 [1.5%]). INTERPRETATION: In infants in developing countries in Asia, pentavalent rotavirus vaccine is safe and efficacious against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, and our results support expanded WHO recommendations to promote its global use. FUNDING: PATH (GAVI Alliance grant) and Merck.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bangladesh , Double-Blind Method , Female , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Male , Rotavirus Infections/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vietnam
13.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 29(3): 263-5, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949360

ABSTRACT

The pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine is indicated as a 3-dose series with first dose administered orally at 6 to 12 weeks with subsequent doses at 4 to 10 week intervals. In pre-licensure phase III trials, the majority followed this schedule, but there were 2956 instances where infants received a dose of pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine/placebo >10 weeks after the previous dose. Among this subset, the efficacy against any severity of disease, the reduction in utilization of healthcare resources and the safety profile after vaccination were comparable with overall results.


Subject(s)
Immunization, Secondary/methods , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Female , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Placebos/administration & dosage , Reassortant Viruses/immunology , Rotavirus/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/pathology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
14.
J Biopharm Stat ; 18(4): 631-8; discussion 439-45, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18607795

ABSTRACT

Upon termination of a clinical trial that uses interim evaluations to determine whether the trial can be stopped, a proper statistical analysis must account for the interim evaluations. For example, in a group-sequential design where the efficacy of a treatment regimen is evaluated at interim stages, and the opportunity to stop the trial based on positive efficacy findings exists, the terminal p-value, point estimate, and confidence limits of the outcome of interest must be adjusted to eliminate bias. While it is standard practice to adjust terminal statistical analyses due to opportunities to stop for "positive" findings, adjusting due to opportunities to stop for "negative" findings is also important. Stopping rules for negative findings are particularly useful when monitoring a specific rare serious adverse event in trials designed to show safety with respect to the event. In these settings, establishing conservative stopping rules are appropriate, and therefore accounting for the interim monitoring can have a substantial effect on the final results. Here I present a method to account for interim safety monitoring and illustrate its usefulness. The method is demonstrated to have advantages over methodology that does not account for interim monitoring.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Safety/standards , Sample Size
15.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 27(7): 656-8, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18520448

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of a live, oral, pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against G1-4 rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) was retrospectively assessed based on breastfeeding frequency among 5098 infants in a placebo-controlled trial. The efficacy against any RVGE severity for infants never breastfed, sometimes breastfed, or exclusively breastfed was 68.3%, 82.2%, and 68.0%, respectively. The efficacy against severe RVGE was 100%, 95.4%, and 100%, respectively. Breastfeeding did not seem to adversely impact the efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Reassortant Viruses/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Infant , Placebos/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies
16.
Clin Trials ; 5(2): 131-9, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18375651

ABSTRACT

The Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST) was a blinded, placebo-controlled study of the live pentavalent human-bovine vaccine, RotaTeq (Merck & Co. Inc., West Point, PA). REST was noteworthy because its primary objective was to evaluate the safety of RotaTeq with regard to intussusception, a rare intestinal illness that occurs with a background incidence of approximately 50 cases per 100 000 infant years. The study involved approximately 70 000 infants at over 500 study sites in 11 countries. The study demonstrated that the risk of intussusception was similar in vaccine and placebo recipients and that the vaccine prevented rotavirus gastroenteritis, ameliorated the severity of disease in those who had any disease, and substantially reduced rotavirus-associated hospitalizations and other health care contacts. This report provides an in-depth review of the background, statistical and regulatory considerations, and execution of REST. We describe the rationale and methods used for sample size, continuous safety monitoring, group sequential design, and detailed study execution. The results of the study have been reported elsewhere. The design and conduct of this study may serve as a useful model for planning other future large-scale clinical trials, especially those evaluating uncommon adverse events.


Subject(s)
Intussusception/chemically induced , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Humans , Infant , Models, Statistical , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Risk Assessment
17.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 26(12): 1099-104, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18043445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Premature infants seem to be at greater risk of hospitalization from rotavirus gastroenteritis than term infants. Safety and efficacy of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine were assessed in premature infants enrolled in the large-scale, blinded, placebo-controlled rotavirus efficacy and safety trial (REST). METHODS: Healthy infants 6-12 weeks of chronologic age at study entry were randomized to receive 3 oral doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Infants born at < or =36 weeks of gestational age were eligible if thriving at the time of enrollment. Safety and efficacy were retrospectively assessed in these premature infants comparing vaccine with placebo recipients. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined as forceful vomiting and/or > or =3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, accompanied by detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. RESULTS: A total of 2070 infants between 25 and 36 gestational weeks received at least 1 dose of vaccine or placebo; 1005 vaccine recipients and 1061 placebo recipients were evaluable for safety. Serious adverse events occurred in 55 vaccine recipients (5.5%) and 62 placebo recipients (5.8%). In a nested substudy of 308 premature infants evaluable for detailed safety (154 in each group), the frequencies of fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and irritability were comparable between vaccine and placebo recipients. Overall, 3 doses of the pentavalent vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalizations and emergency department visits in premature infants due to rotavirus gastroenteritis by 100% (95% CI: 82.2-100) compared with placebo. The vaccine also prevented 73.0% (95% CI: -2.2-95.2) of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases of any severity. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of healthy premature infants, the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine was generally well-tolerated and substantially reduced rotavirus-attributable hospitalizations and emergency department visits compared with placebo. Overall, vaccine safety and efficacy seemed to be generally comparable to the results in the REST study population as a whole. These results support vaccinating healthy premature infants on the same schedule as term infants.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Reassortant Viruses/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines , Rotavirus/immunology , Animals , Cattle , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/virology , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
18.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 26(3): 221-7, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17484218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A live pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) containing 5 human-bovine (WC3) reassortants expressing human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4 and P1A[8] was evaluated in a blinded, placebo-controlled study. Possible interactions between PRV and concomitantly administered licensed pediatric vaccines were investigated in a United States-based nested substudy (Concomitant Use Study) of the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial. METHODS: From 2002 to 2003, healthy infants approximately 6 to 12 weeks of age at entry were randomized to receive either 3 oral doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Subjects were also to receive combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B vaccine (2 doses), diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (3 doses), inactivated poliovirus vaccine (2 doses) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (3 doses) on the same day; oral poliovirus vaccine was not administered. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring antibody responses to PRV and antigens contained in the licensed vaccines. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined by forceful vomiting and/or -3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, and detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events using diary cards. RESULTS: The Concomitant Use Study enrolled 662 subjects in the PRV group and 696 subjects in the placebo group. For the 17 antigens in the concomitantly administered vaccines, antibody responses were similar in PRV and placebo recipients, except for moderately diminished antibody responses to the pertactin component of pertussis vaccine. Efficacy of PRV against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity was 89.5% (95% CI = 26.5-99.8%). PRV was generally well tolerated when given concomitantly with the prespecified vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, antibody responses to the concomitantly administered vaccines were generally similar in PRV and placebo recipients. PRV was efficacious and well tolerated when given concomitantly with pediatric vaccines licensed in the United States.


Subject(s)
Reassortant Viruses/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Rotavirus/immunology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cattle , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Haemophilus Vaccines/adverse effects , Haemophilus Vaccines/immunology , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Infant , Male , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/adverse effects , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/immunology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , United States
19.
Pediatrics ; 119(1): 11-8, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17200266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is the leading cause of dehydrating acute gastroenteritis in infants worldwide. Previous studies of a live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine have shown it to be efficacious across a range of potencies. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life in healthy infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2002-2004, 1312 healthy infants approximately 6 to 12 weeks old from the United States (47%) and Finland (53%) were randomly assigned to receive 3 oral doses of vaccine (vaccine at approximately 1.1 x 10(7) infectious U per dose) or placebo approximately 4 to 10 weeks apart. Infants were to be followed for acute gastroenteritis through 1 rotavirus season after vaccination and for adverse events postvaccination. RESULTS: Three doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life demonstrated efficacy against rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by human G-serotypes included in the vaccine (G1-G4). Efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 100%, and efficacy against any rotavirus gastroenteritis regardless of severity was 72.5%. A threefold rise in G1 serum neutralizing was observed in 57% and in anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A in 96% of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients. No statistically significant increase in vomiting, diarrhea, or irritability was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients within the 7-day period from each dose. A statistically significant increase in fevers (> or = 100.5 degrees F, rectal equivalent) was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients after dose 1. CONCLUSIONS: This pentavalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine was generally well tolerated, efficacious, and immunogenic at the end of shelf life.


Subject(s)
Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination , Acute Disease , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Double-Blind Method , Feces/virology , Female , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Gastroenteritis/virology , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Infant , Male , Rotavirus/immunology , Rotavirus/isolation & purification , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 11 Suppl 2: S36-42, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18162245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To perform an integrated safety analysis of data from the Phase III studies of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV). METHODS: Healthy 6- to 12-week-old infants received 3 doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals in 3 Phase III, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Active surveillance for serious adverse events (AE), including intussusception, was performed at 7, 14, and 42 days after each dose. Other AEs occurring within 42 days after each dose were documented on Vaccination Report Cards. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains was evaluated by plaque assay and electropherotyping. RESULTS: Intussusception and other serious AEs were evaluated among 71,799 vaccinated subjects. Within 42 days after any dose, intussusception occurred among 6 PRV and 5 placebo recipients. All AEs were evaluated among 11 722 vaccinated subjects. Within the week following the first dose, the incidences of fever and irritability were similar among PRV and placebo recipients, although diarrhea and vomiting occurred more frequently among PRV recipients versus placebo recipients (10.4% vs. 9.1% and 6.7% vs. 5.4%, respectively). Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred in 8.9% of 360 PRV recipients after the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: Across the 3 Phase III clinical trials, PRV was well tolerated, with no increased clinical risk of intussusception. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred infrequently and in low amounts, suggesting the risk of transmission is unlikely.


Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Rotavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Rotavirus/immunology , Cohort Studies , Feces/virology , Female , Gastroenteritis/virology , Humans , Infant , Intussusception/etiology , Male , Reassortant Viruses/immunology , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Virus Shedding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...