Altered nitric oxide system in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ocular blood flow response to systemic nitric oxide synthase inhibition in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: In 12 patients with glaucoma and 12 age-matched control subjects, subfoveal choroidal blood flow, optic nerve head blood flow, ocular fundus pulsation amplitude, intraocular pressure, and systemic hemodynamic parameters were measured at baseline and after inhibition of nitric oxide synthase by intravenous administration of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. RESULTS: The increase in blood pressure in response to NG-monomethyl-L-arginine was comparable between the 2 study cohorts. In patients with glaucoma, the decrease of optic nerve head blood flow (P = .03) and fundus pulsation amplitude (P<.001) during nitric oxide synthase inhibition was significantly less pronounced than in healthy control subjects. A tendency toward a reduced response in choroidal blood flow was seen (P = .051 between groups) in patients with glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in vivo study providing evidence for an altered ocular L-arginine/nitric oxide system in patients with glaucoma. Normalization of the ocular nitric oxide production may be beneficial in terms of normalization of ocular blood flow and neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells.

Specific endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonism does not modulate insulin-induced hemodynamic effects in the human kidney, eye, or forearm.

There is evidence that hyperinsulinemia may stimulate endothelin-1 (ET-1) generation or release, which may affect diabetic vascular complications. BQ-123, a specific ET(A) receptor antagonist, was used to investigate if insulin-induced vascular effects are influenced by an acute ET-1 release. Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over studies were performed. In protocol 1, 12 healthy subjects received, on separate study days, infusions of BQ-123 (60 microg/min for 30 min) during placebo clamp conditions, BQ-123 during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (3 mU/kg/min for 390 min), or placebo during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Fundus pulsation amplitude (FPA) was measured to assess pulsatile choroidal blood flow, and mean flow velocity (MFV) of the ophtalmic artery was measured by color Doppler imaging. In protocol 2, eight healthy subjects received, on separate study days, intra-arterial infusions of BQ-123 (32 microg/min for 120 min) during placebo or insulin clamp. Forearm blood flow was measured with bilateral plethysmography, expressing the ratio of responses in the intervention arm and in the control arm. Insulin alone increased FPA (+10%, p < 0.001) and forearm blood flow (+19%). BQ-123 increased FPA, MFV, and forearm blood flow ratio in the absence and presence of exogenous insulin, but this effect was not different between normo- and hyperinsulinemic conditions. ET-1 plasma concentrations were not affected by insulin. In conclusion, these data do not support the concept that hyperinsulinemia increases ET-1 generation in healthy subjects. Our results, however, cannot necessarily be extrapolated to diabetic and obese subjects.

Vasodilator effects of L-arginine are stereospecific and augmented by insulin in humans.

The amino acid l-arginine, the precursor of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, induces vasodilation in vivo, but the mechanism behind this effect is unclear. There is, however, some evidence to assume that the l-arginine membrane transport capacity is dependent on insulin plasma levels. We hypothesized that vasodilator effects of l-arginine may be dependent on insulin plasma levels. Accordingly, we performed two randomized, double-blind crossover studies in healthy male subjects. In protocol 1 (n = 15), subjects received an infusion of insulin (6 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 120 min) or placebo and, during the last 30 min, l-arginine or d-arginine (1 g/min for 30 min) x In protocol 2 (n = 8), subjects received l-arginine in stepwise increasing doses in the presence (1.5 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or absence of insulin. Renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were assessed by the para-aminohippurate and inulin plasma clearance methods, respectively. Pulsatile choroidal blood flow was assessed with laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation, and mean flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery was measured with Doppler sonography. l-arginine, but not d-arginine, significantly increased renal and ocular hemodynamic parameters. Coinfusion of l-arginine with insulin caused a dose-dependent leftward shift of the vasodilator effect of l-arginine. This stereospecific renal and ocular vasodilator potency of l-arginine is enhanced by insulin, which may result from facilitated l-arginine membrane transport, enhanced intracellular NO formation, or increased NO bioavailability.

Renal hemodynamic effects of somatostatin are not related to inhibition of endogenous insulin release.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin inhibits endocrine and exocrine secretions and exerts renal vasoconstriction. The mechanism underlying somatostatin's vascular effects is unknown. Since insulin can cause vasodilation, we hypothesized that removal of basal insulin release by somatostatin may contribute to somatostatin-induced renal vasoconstriction. METHODS: The study was conducted in different protocols comprising forty-six healthy male volunteers. Randomized studies were performed to compare the effects of somatostatin alone (0.1 microg/kg/min) to the effects of somatostatin + low dose insulin (0.1 mU/kg/min), the effects of somatostatin + low dose insulin to the effects of somatostatin + high dose insulin (1.5 mU/kg/min), and the effects of insulin (1.5 mU/kg/min) + somatostatin. Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured with the para-aminohippurate (PAH) and the inulin clearance technique, respectively. Blood pressure and pulse rate were measured non-invasively. RESULTS: Somatostatin alone decreased GFR (-14 +/- 6%, P < 0.001) and RPF (-16 +/- 7%, P < 0.001) whereas systemic hemodynamics were unchanged. Preceding or concomitant infusion of insulin at high doses (insulin plasma concentration of 127 +/- 25 or 144 +/- 17 microU/mL) but not co-infusion with low dose insulin (insulin plasma concentration of 11 +/- 3 microU/mL) mitigated or reversed the vasoconstrictive actions of somatostatin on GFR and RPF. CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin induces marked renal vasoconstriction and exogenous restoration of fasting insulin concentrations does not influence the renal vascular effects. Therefore, it is unlikely that somatostatin-induced vasoconstriction is due to removal of basal insulin. Plasma insulin concentrations in the high postprandial range can reverse somatostatin-induced renal vasoconstriction, suggesting functional antagonism.