ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience of all patients presenting to a tertiary referral centre over a 3 year time period with blunt scrotal trauma and to describe a methodical approach for managing this group of patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of a level 1 trauma centre with blunt scrotal trauma from 2010 to 2013 inclusive. Inclusion criteria included a recent history of blunt scrotal trauma with associated pain and/or swelling of the affected testis on clinical examination. RESULTS: Twenty-seven male patients with a median age of 19 (range 8-65) years were included and all but 1 patient underwent scrotal ultrasonography upon presentation. Sixteen patients (59%) presented with scrotal trauma secondary to a sports related injury. Fifteen patients were managed conservatively and of the 12 who underwent urgent exploration 9 had a testicular rupture, including 1 who had an emergency orchidectomy due to a completely shattered testis. Four patients had >30% of the testis replaced by necrotic tissue/haematoma; of which 2 ultimately underwent orchidectomy and insertion of testicular prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that the necessity for scrotal protection in sports that predispose to scrotal trauma should be reviewed. We also demonstrate the importance of scrotal ultrasonography for determining an appropriate management strategy (i.e., conservative versus surgical treatment) in this young patient cohort.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Scrotum/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/etiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Complications of indwelling central venous access devices (CVAD) were assessed in 63 children with cancer and 35 without cancer. METHODOLOGY: Central venous access devices placed surgically in 1991 were reviewed for complications. RESULTS: In cancer patients, the median CVAD duration was 211 days (range 9-924), compared to 37 days (range 3-339) in the non-cancer patients. Although significantly more CVAD, 41 of 72 (57%), were infected in the cancer patients compared to 14 of 40 (35%) CVAD in the non-cancer patients (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.03-5.93), the rate of line infection in cancer patients was lower: 2.8 per 1000 catheter days compared with 7.6 per 1000 in non-cancer patients (P = 0.0014). Infection was significantly more common in intensive chemotherapy cancer patients (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Treating infected CVAD with antibiotics or hydrochloric acid (HCl), clearing occluded lines with streptokinase/HCl and repairing fractured lines, when successful, resulted in a considerable gain in the number of days of use for the CVAD.
