Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(13): 2701-7, 2004 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15226337

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated 8-year survival and late neuropsychologic toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in a randomized clinical trial to test whether hyperfractionated (twice daily) cranial radiation therapy (CRT) can reduce incidence and severity of late toxicities associated with 18 Gy of CRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 369 children treated on two consecutive Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomly assigned to conventionally fractionated CRT (CFX) or hyperfractionated CRT (HFX) to a total dose of 18 Gy. Neuropsychologic testing was completed for 125 of 287 children in continuous complete remission. Event-free and overall survival, as well as neuropsychologic function, were compared for the two arms of the protocol. RESULTS: Eight-year event-free survival (+/- SE) was 80% +/- 3% for children randomly assigned to CFX and 72% +/- 3% for HFX (P =.06). Overall survival was 85% +/- 3% for CFX and 78% +/- 3% for HFX (P =.06). CNS relapses occurred in 2.8% of patients receiving CFX and 2.7% receiving HFX (P =.99). Cognitive function for both groups was solidly in the average range, with no group differences in intelligence, academic achievement, visuospatial reasoning, or verbal learning. Children on the HFX arm exhibited a modest advantage for visual memory (P <.05). CONCLUSION: HFX provides no benefit in terms of cognitive late effects and may compromise antileukemic efficacy. HFX should not be substituted for conventionally dosed CRT in children who require radiation therapy for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Memory Disorders/etiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Adolescent , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Disease-Free Survival , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Memory Disorders/prevention & control , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(19): 3616-22, 2003 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14512392

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) accounts for 10% to 15% of newly diagnosed cases of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Historically, T-ALL patients have had a worse prognosis than other ALL patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of 125 patients with T-ALL treated on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium trials between 1981 and 1995. Therapy included four- or five-agent remission induction; consolidation therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, corticosteroid, mercaptopurine, and weekly high-dose asparaginase; and cranial radiation. T-ALL patients were treated the same as high-risk B-progenitor ALL patients. Fifteen patients with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma were also treated with the same high-risk regimen between 1981 and 2000. RESULTS: The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate for T-ALL patients was 75% +/- 4%. Fourteen of 15 patients with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma were long-term survivors. There was no significant difference in EFS comparing patients with T-ALL and B-progenitor ALL (P =.56), although T-ALL patients had significantly higher rates of induction failure (P <.0001), and central nervous system (CNS) relapse (P =.02). The median time to relapse in T-ALL patients was 1.2 years versus 2.5 years in B-progenitor ALL patients (P =.001). There were no pretreatment characteristics associated with worse prognosis in patients with T-ALL. CONCLUSION: T-ALL patients fared as well as B-progenitor patients on DFCI ALL Consortium protocols. Patients with T-ALL remain at increased risk for induction failure, early relapse, and isolated CNS relapse. Future studies should focus on the identification of and treatment for T-ALL patients at high risk for treatment failure.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/secondary , Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell/drug therapy , Burkitt Lymphoma/drug therapy , Burkitt Lymphoma/pathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell/pathology , Male , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(15): 2953-60, 2003 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12885815

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term effects of treatment on height and weight in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with one of the following three different CNS therapies: intrathecal therapy alone, intrathecal therapy with conventional cranial radiation, or intrathecal therapy with twice-daily radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 618 children treated on two consecutive Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for ALL were measured for height and weight at diagnosis, and approximately every 6 months thereafter. Patient height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were converted to z scores for age and sex using the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts for the United States. RESULTS: Children younger than 13 years at diagnosis had a statistically significant decrease in their height z scores and an increase in their BMI z scores, regardless of whether they had received cranial radiation. Young age at diagnosis and increased chemotherapy intensity were major risk factors. Unexpectedly, there was no significant difference in long-term height between children who received radiation and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Final height is compromised in survivors of ALL. The detrimental effects on height occur during therapy without the ability for long-term catch-up growth. Although patients became overweight for height, this seemed to be a result of relative height loss with normal weight gain rather than accelerated weight gain. The type of CNS treatment received did not affect changes in height, weight, or BMI.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Body Weight , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Adolescent , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Infant , Linear Models , Male , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/physiopathology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...