Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(28)2021 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34260382

ABSTRACT

Despite decades of policy that strives to reduce nutrient and sediment export from agricultural fields, surface water quality in intensively managed agricultural landscapes remains highly degraded. Recent analyses show that current conservation efforts are not sufficient to reverse widespread water degradation in Midwestern agricultural systems. Intensifying row crop agriculture and increasing climate pressure require a more integrated approach to water quality management that addresses diverse sources of nutrients and sediment and off-field mitigation actions. We used multiobjective optimization analysis and integrated three biophysical models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative portfolios of watershed management practices at achieving nitrate and suspended sediment reduction goals in an agricultural basin of the Upper Midwestern United States. Integrating watershed-scale models enabled the inclusion of near-channel management alongside more typical field management and thus directly the comparison of cost-effectiveness across portfolios. The optimization analysis revealed that fluvial wetlands (i.e., wide, slow-flowing, vegetated water bodies within the riverine corridor) are the single-most cost-effective management action to reduce both nitrate and sediment loads and will be essential for meeting moderate to aggressive water quality targets. Although highly cost-effective, wetland construction was costly compared to other practices, and it was not selected in portfolios at low investment levels. Wetland performance was sensitive to placement, emphasizing the importance of watershed scale planning to realize potential benefits of wetland restorations. We conclude that extensive interagency cooperation and coordination at a watershed scale is required to achieve substantial, economically viable improvements in water quality under intensive row crop agricultural production.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/standards , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Models, Theoretical , Water Quality/standards , Budgets , Cooperative Behavior , Geography , Minnesota
2.
J Environ Manage ; 277: 111420, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33049613

ABSTRACT

Near-channel sediment loading (NCSL) is localized and episodic, making it difficult to accurately quantify its cumulative contribution to watershed sediment loading, let alone predict the effects from changes in river discharge due to climate change or land management practices. We developed a methodological framework, using commonly available stream gaging data, for estimating watershed-scale NCSL, a feature generally absent in most watershed models. The method utilizes a network of paired gages that bracket the incised river corridors of 15 tributaries to the Minnesota River, in which near-channel sources are often the dominant contributors of sediment loading. For each set of paired gages, we calculate NCSL as the difference between the upstream and downstream sediment loading minus the field contribution between the gages. NCSL generally increases with river discharge when it exceeds the observed threshold benchmark in the tributaries of Minnesota River Basin; accordingly, we developed a predictive model for quantifying NCSL using river discharge as the independent variable. This approach provides a predictive basis for evaluating the impacts on near-channel sediment supply from increases in runoff and river discharge. Application of this approach includes evaluation of watershed-scale conservation trade-offs, where benefits of landscape management practices, such as wetlands and reservoirs are measured in terms of reduction in downstream near-channel sediment loading in the incised river corridors.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Geologic Sediments , Minnesota , Rivers , Wetlands
3.
Environ Sci Technol ; 51(15): 8263-8271, 2017 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28640599

ABSTRACT

Current microbial source-tracking (MST) methods, employed to determine sources of fecal contamination in waterways, use molecular markers targeting host-associated bacteria in animal or human feces. However, there is a lack of knowledge about fecal microbiome composition in several animals and imperfect marker specificity and sensitivity. To overcome these issues, a community-based MST method has been developed. Here, we describe a study done in the Lake Superior-Saint Louis River estuary using SourceTracker, a program that calculates the source contribution to an environment. High-throughput DNA sequencing of microbiota from a diverse collection of fecal samples obtained from 11 types of animals (wild, agricultural, and domesticated) and treated effluent (n = 233) was used to generate a fecal library to perform community-based MST. Analysis of 319 fecal and environmental samples revealed that the community compositions in water and fecal samples were significantly different, allowing for the determination of the presence of fecal inputs and identification of specific sources. SourceTracker results indicated that fecal bacterial inputs into the Lake Superior estuary were primarily attributed to wastewater effluent and, to a lesser extent, geese and gull wastes. These results suggest that a community-based MST method may be another useful tool for determining sources of aquatic fecal bacteria.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/genetics , Feces , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Water Microbiology , Animals , DNA , Environmental Monitoring , Estuaries , Humans , Lakes
4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 109(45): 18619-24, 2012 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23091018

ABSTRACT

Despite broad recognition of the value of the goods and services provided by nature, existing tools for assessing and valuing ecosystem services often fall short of the needs and expectations of decision makers. Here we address one of the most important missing components in the current ecosystem services toolbox: a comprehensive and generalizable framework for describing and valuing water quality-related services. Water quality is often misrepresented as a final ecosystem service. We argue that it is actually an important contributor to many different services, from recreation to human health. We present a valuation approach for water quality-related services that is sensitive to different actions that affect water quality, identifies aquatic endpoints where the consequences of changing water quality on human well-being are realized, and recognizes the unique groups of beneficiaries affected by those changes. We describe the multiple biophysical and economic pathways that link actions to changes in water quality-related ecosystem goods and services and provide guidance to researchers interested in valuing these changes. Finally, we present a valuation template that integrates biophysical and economic models, links actions to changes in service provision and value estimates, and considers multiple sources of water quality-related ecosystem service values without double counting.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Ecosystem , Health , Water Quality/standards , Biophysical Phenomena , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Humans , Models, Biological , Models, Economic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...