Consequences of immunogenicity to the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies ReoPro and Remicade.

The clinical consequences of immune antibodies generated to abciximab (ReoPro) and infliximab (Remicade) are described. Abciximab, a chimaeric Fab fragment that binds to the beta3 integrin of the GPIIb/IIIa and alphavbeta3 receptors on human platelets, is approved in the US and Europe for use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent cardiac ischaemic complications. The effects of induced antibodies upon the safety and efficacy of repeat administration of abciximab have been evaluated in the ReoPro Re-administration Registry Study, in which 5.7% of patients were HACA positive before re-treatment. An interim evaluation of 1000 patients has indicated that re-administration of abciximab can be accomplished in the setting of PCI with an acceptable safety and efficacy profile. Infliximab is a chimaeric IgG1 antibody specific for human TNFalpha, and is approved in the US and Europe for the acute treatment of the signs and symptoms of Crohn's disease and for the chronic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The incidence of antibodies to infliximab is reported to be approximately 10%; however, an inverse dose-immunogenicity relationship was observed, indicating that higher doses of infliximab (> or = 3 to 10 mg/kg) could reduce the incidence of immune antibodies. The induction of immune antibodies could also be reduced by concomitant administration of low-dose methotrexate and other immunosuppressant agents. Although antibodies to infliximab appeared to be associated with lower serum infliximab concentrations and a slightly higher incidence of infusion reactions, these immune antibodies were generally not associated with a reduction in clinical efficacy. In addition, the antibodies induced to infliximab are specific for infliximab, and do not cross-react with other currently available therapeutic antibodies.

Abciximab readministration: results of the ReoPro Readministration Registry.

BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with abciximab (ReoPro) improves the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. This registry was conducted to characterize the effects of repeated administration of abciximab during intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recruited 500 consecutive patients at 22 centers in the United States who were receiving abciximab for at least a second time during percutaneous coronary intervention. Safety was measured as the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Efficacy was assessed as event-free clinical success. Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) responses were also characterized. There were no cases of hypersensitivity (95% upper confidence bound, 0.3%), major bleeding, or death. Clinical success was 94.4%. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 patients (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.8% to 6.4%), including 12 (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.1% to 3.7%) who developed profound thrombocytopenia (<20x10(9) cells/L). In 2 patients (0.4%), profound thrombocytopenia did not develop until after hospital discharge; in 4 (0.8%), profound thrombocytopenia recurred despite platelet transfusion. Before a first readministration, a positive HACA titer was present in 22 of 454 patients (4.8%); after a first readministration, an additional 82 of 432 (19.0%) became HACA-positive. HACA did not neutralize the in vitro inhibition of platelet aggregation by abciximab or correlate with clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: The results, including overall rates of thrombocytopenia, were consistent with randomized clinical trials of first abciximab treatment. However, there was a shift from mild to profound thrombocytopenia, and cases of delayed presentation and of recurrent thrombocytopenia were seen. These findings suggest that indications and guidelines for first-time use apply to retreatment, particularly the systematic monitoring for thrombocytopenia.

Occurrence and clinical significance of pseudothrombocytopenia during abciximab therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study determined the incidence of pseudothrombocytopenia during abciximab therapy administered for percutaneous coronary interventions and compared the clinical course of patients with pseudothrombocytopenia with the clinical courses of patients with thrombocytopenia and patients with normal platelet counts. BACKGROUND: Although pseudothrombocytopenia has been previously reported during therapy with abciximab, the incidence and significance of this occurrence are unknown. The failure to differentiate pseudothrombocytopenia from thrombocytopenia could lead to unnecessary interruption of abciximab infusions or to platelet transfusions. METHODS: The incidences of pseudothrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were determined in four large placebo-controlled abciximab trials: c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE), Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC), Evaluation of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty to Improve Long-term Outcome of c7E3 GpIIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade (EPILOG) and Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT). The clinical features, bleeding complications and major clinical outcomes of patients with pseudothrombocytopenia and those with thrombocytopenia were compared with each other and with those of patients with normal platelet count. RESULTS: Pseudothrombocytopenia occurred in 2.1% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.7%, 2.5%) of abciximab-treated patients and in 0.6% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 3.7% (95% CI: 3.2%, 4.2%) of abciximab-treated patients and in 1.8% (95% CI: 1.3%, 2.3%) of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). Patients with thrombocytopenia had significantly higher rates of major bleeding, major decreases in hemoglobin and increased transfusion requirements of both blood and platelets compared with those without thrombocytopenia. By contrast, pseudothrombocytopenic patients did not differ from patients with normal platelet counts in any of the measures of blood loss or transfusion requirements. Thrombocytopenic patients, but not those with pseudothrombocytopenia, had increased rates of revascularization at 30 days and six months. As previously reported, there was also a higher rate of death and myocardial infarction in the thrombocytopenic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudothrombocytopenia is the cause of more than one third (36.3%) of low platelet counts in patients undergoing coronary interventions who are treated with abciximab. This study demonstrates that pseudothrombocytopenia is a benign laboratory condition that does not increase bleeding, stroke, transfusion requirements or the need for repeat revascularization. It is important to recognize pseudothrombocytopenia so that the beneficial effects of abciximab are not lost by premature termination of therapy.

Therapeutic heparin concentrations augment platelet reactivity: implications for the pharmacologic assessment of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist abciximab.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of heparin on the platelet reactivity and the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ex vivo studies were performed on patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 26) who were at moderate to high risk of ischemic complications. Patients received a 12,000-U bolus of heparin followed by a 0.25-mg/kg bolus of abciximab. Before abciximab treatment, platelet aggregation responses to a variety of stimuli were assessed immediately before and 10 minutes after the heparin bolus. Heparin increased platelet aggregation to 2 and 5 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 5 microg/mL collagen by 36%, 25%, and 46%, respectively (P < or =.001), but did not influence platelet reactivity to thrombin receptor-activating peptide or 20 micromol/L ADP and had no appreciable effect on platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor numbers. To assess the impact of heparin on the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and platelet aggregation inhibition estimates obtained after abciximab administration were calculated relative to the basal levels observed both before and after the heparin bolus. At 2 and 24 hours after the abciximab bolus, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade measurements normalized to either the preheparin or postheparin baseline determinations were equivalent. For all ADP concentrations tested, the 2-hour post-abciximab bolus platelet aggregation inhibition estimates based on the preheparin and postheparin baseline values were comparable. However, for 2 and 5 micromol/L ADP, the 24-hour post-abciximab platelet aggregation inhibition measurements based on preheparin baseline values were significantly lower than postheparin baseline determinations (both P < or =.003). In vitro studies revealed that therapeutic heparin doses induced a concentration-dependent reduction in the extent of platelet inhibition produced by amounts of abciximab that elicit partial inhibition of platelet aggregation. However, at abciximab concentrations that achieved platelet aggregation blockade of >80%, the levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation in the presence and absence of heparin were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative ex vivo and in vitro data indicate that for certain stimuli, heparin alters the platelet inhibitory profile of abciximab at concentrations of the agent that yield partial suppression of platelet function.

Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term abciximab treatment demonstrates prolonged platelet inhibition with gradual recovery from GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade.

BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab is approved for use in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. The purpose of the present study was to establish the pharmacodynamic profile and platelet-bound life span of abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: The pharmacodynamics of abciximab (inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation and GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) were measured in 41 individuals who were randomized to receive a 0.25-mg/kg bolus and a 12-hour infusion of either 10 microg/min (EPIC regimen) or 0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (EPILOG regimen) of the antiplatelet agent. At extended times, the amount and distribution of platelet-bound abciximab were monitored by flow cytometry. The EPIC and EPILOG infusion regimens exhibited equivalent blockade of both GP IIb/IIIa receptors and platelet aggregation throughout the duration of abciximab treatment. Flow cytometry revealed a single, highly fluorescent platelet population during treatment, consistent with complete saturation and homogeneous distribution of abciximab on circulating platelets. For 15 days after treatment, the fluorescence histograms remained unimodal with gradually diminishing fluorescence intensity, indicating decreasing levels of platelet-bound abciximab. At 8 and 15 days, which exceeds the normal circulating life span of platelets, median relative fluorescence intensity corresponded to 29100 (29% GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) and 13300 (13% GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade) abciximab molecules bound per platelet, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with continuous reequilibration of abciximab among circulating platelets and may explain the gradual recovery of platelet function and long-term prevention of ischemic complications by abciximab after coronary intervention.