Systematic re-evaluation of intraoperative motor-evoked potential suppression in scoliosis surgery.

BACKGROUND: Motor- (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) are susceptible to the effects of intraoperative environmental factors. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 250 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent corrective surgery with IOM were retrospectively analyzed for MEP suppression (MEPS). RESULTS: Our results show that four distinct groups of MEPS were encountered over the study period. All 12 patients did not sustain any neurological deficits postoperatively. However, comparison of groups 1 and 2 suggests that neither the duration of anesthesia nor speed of surgical or anesthetic intervention were associated with recovery to a level beyond the criteria for MEPS. For group 3, spontaneous MEPS recovery despite the lack of surgical intervention suggests that anesthetic intervention may play a role in this process. However, spontaneous MEPS recovery was also seen in group 4, suggesting that in certain circumstances, both surgical and anesthetic intervention was not required. In addition, neither the duration of time to the first surgical manoeuver nor the duration of surgical manoeuver to MEPS were related to recovery of MEPS. None of the patients had suppression of SSEPs intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that in susceptible individuals, MEPS may rarely occur unpredictably, independent of surgical or anesthetic intervention. However, our findings favor anesthetic before surgical intervention as a proposed protocol. Early recognition of MEPS is important to prevent false positives in the course of IOM for spinal surgery.

Motor root conduction block in the Lewis-Sumner syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS) is a rare immune-mediated peripheral nerve disorder presenting with asymmetric upper limb sensory complaints and motor weakness. Asian patients with LSS have not been reported in the English literature. METHODS: Three Asian patients with features of LSS were prospectively studied. RESULTS: Our patients tended to older, female, and have involvement of the upper limbs exclusively than those in the West. They have a markedly longer disease duration before a diagnosis was made, which could also be the result of difficulty in eliciting motor root conduction block as a sign of proximal demyelination as observed in every patient. Pain is a universal feature as is sensory nerve conduction abnormality. None responded to immunotherapy, but disease stabilization was observed over the chronic course. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, these unique observations in Asian patients with LSS differ from those reported in Western literature. The presence of motor root conduction block demonstrated for the first time is instrumental in establishing a diagnosis.

Sensitivities of sensory nerve conduction study parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome.

It is generally accepted that median sensory nerve conduction studies are more sensitive than motor nerve conduction studies in the electrodiagnostic evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study was conducted to compare the sensitivities of various parameters of sensory nerve conduction studies in the diagnosis of CTS. This prospective study included 88 consecutive patients (151 hands) with CTS and 106 control subjects. CTS was diagnosed clinically by two neurologists. Median sensory nerve responses with wrist stimulation were determined. The onset and peak latencies, peak-to-peak amplitudes, negative peak duration, and area were measured. The differences between the peak and onset latencies were also calculated as a measure of waveform temporal dispersion. Among each measured parameter, values between the 2.5th and the 97.5th percentile range of the control subjects served as the normal limits. Among the 151 hands with suspected CTS, five (3.3%) had normal electrodiagnostic studies and 146 (96.7%) had at least one abnormal electrodiagnostic study. Among the 146 hands with an abnormality, 138 had abnormal onset latency, 143 had abnormal peak latency, and 88 had abnormal difference between peak and onset latency. In addition, 87 had abnormal amplitude, 70 had abnormal duration, and 59 had abnormal area. The sensitivity was 91.4% for onset latency, 94.7% for peak latency, 58.3% for difference between peak and onset latency, 57.6% for amplitude, 46.4% for duration, and 39.1% for area. Our study shows that in patients with CTS, the most sensitive sensory nerve conduction parameter is the peak latency. Studying various additional sensory nerve conduction parameters did not significantly increase the diagnostic yield.

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery: comparison of desflurane/nitrous oxide with propofol total intravenous anesthetic regimens.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study in a large general hospital setting. BACKGROUND: During spinal surgery, monitoring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) is a means of assessing the intraoperative integrity of corticospinal pathways. However, MEPs are known to be sensitive to the effects of anesthetic agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of desflurane or total intravenous anesthetic regimens (TIVA) with multipulse cortical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring (IOM). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients (10 in each arm) undergoing scoliosis correction surgery were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups receiving desflurane or TIVA. Inhalational anesthesia was maintained using 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and a mean end-tidal desflurane concentration of 3.4%. For TIVA, continuous intravenous infusion of propofol was used. For analgesia, fentanyl and morphine were given when required for both groups. Cortical stimulation was achieved with 2 bipolar direct current stimulators connected in parallel by jumper cables. Five equivalent pulses 0.5 ms in duration at 4 ms intervals were delivered at C1C2 positions. MEP recordings were made in the abductor hallucis (AH) and tibialis anterior (TA) with needle electrodes. RESULTS: Reproducible MEPs were obtained throughout the operation in all 20 cases, with up to 80 mA per stimulator. Before insertion of pedicle screws, mean MEP amplitudes (SD) obtained were 85 (19) and 21.7 (10.8) mV for AH and TA, respectively, using desflurane. With TIVA, amplitudes were 56.7 (28.4) and 59.1 (24.5) mV, respectively. Both muscle MEP amplitudes were significantly different using different anesthetic regimens (P < 0.05 for all). AH MEP amplitudes obtained with desflurane were significantly larger than TA amplitudes (P < 0.0001). No complications were reported intraoperatively and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing the use of desflurane and TIVA showing that both anesthetic regimens allowed successful intraoperative monitoring useage throughout the procedures. For MEP recording, the AH was the preferred muscle with a desflurane anesthetic regimen.

Effect of exercise on repetitive nerve stimulation studies: new appraisal of an old technique.

Repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) is a simple and rapid method for evaluation of neuromuscular transmission defects. Although the effect of exercise in conjunction with RNS is well recognized, it has not been standardized in actual patient and control groups. In a prospective study over a period of 1 year, the authors evaluated the effect of exercise in conjunction with RNS in comparison with conventional 3-Hz RNS at rest in the clinical setting. Fifty-four patients who were referred for possible neuromuscular transmission disorders, in addition to 35 healthy control subjects, were studied. Amplitude and area decremental responses with RNS at rest and after 20 seconds of maximal exercise at 1-minute intervals up to 3 minutes were evaluated. The use of RNS with exercise resulted in additional diagnostic yield of up to 36.4% compared with conventional 3-Hz RNS at rest. The standardized use of exercise with RNS is advocated for increasing its diagnostic yield in the neurophysiologic laboratory.