ABSTRACT
Background: Registries are regarded as a just valuable fount of data on determining neonates suffering prematurity or low birth weight (LBW), ameliorating provided care, and developing studies. Objective: This study aimed to probe the studies, including premature infants' registries, adapt the needed minimum data set, and provide an offered framework for premature infants' registries. Material and Methods: For this descriptive study, electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Embase/Medline were searched. In addition, a review of gray literature was undertaken to identify relevant studies in English on current registries and databases. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts was conducted independently based on PRISMA guidelines. The basic registry information, scope, registry type, data source, the purpose of the registry, and important variables were extracted and analyzed. Results: Fifty-six papers were qualified and contained in the process that presented 51 systems and databases linked in prematurity at the popular and government levels in 34 countries from 1963 to 2017. As a central model of the information management system and knowledge management, a prematurity registry framework was offered based on data, information, and knowledge structure. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is a comprehensive study that has systematically reviewed prematurity-related registries. Since there are international standards to develop new registries, the proposed framework in this article can be beneficial too. This framework is essential not only to facilitate the prematurity registry design but also to help the collection of high-value clinical data necessary for the acquisition of better clinical knowledge.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Oropharyngeal interventions are an accepted method to improve the nutritional performance of premature infants. Considering the countless benefits of breast milk and the few studies on the use of breast milk as an oral-pharyngeal intervention, this study was conducted with the aim of determining the effect of oral-pharyngeal administration of breast milk on nutritional outcomes in premature infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this clinical trial, 80 premature infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit of Amir al-Mu'minin Hospital in Semnan (a city in Iran) were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 40) and control groups (n = 40). Infants in the intervention group were given breast milk, and infants in the control group were given sterile water as a placebo. The data collection tool included demographic and clinical questions checklist, including sex, gestational age, weight, milk administration time, lavage and its amount, vomiting, abdominal distension, and so on. Data analysis was performed using SPSS23. RESULTS: The mean volume of total milk received by infants (p = 0.047) and the mean volume of milk received by mouth (p < 0.000) at the time of discharge were higher in the intervention group. Moreover, the time to start enteral nutrition in the intervention group was lower than in the control group (P = 0.012). Administering mother's milk through the oropharyngeal method led to a reduction in infants' length of stay in the hospital (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the present study, the oropharyngeal administration of breast milk in the first days after the birth of premature infants admitted to the hospital improves the outcomes related to their nutritional status. Therefore, it is suggested that this convenient, safe, and feasible method be used in hospitalized premature infants as soon as possible so that premature infants can benefit from the important advantages of breast milk.
