Measuring wellbeing: A scoping review of metrics and studies measuring medical student wellbeing across multiple timepoints.

PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated poor mental health in medical students. However, there is wide variation in study design and metric use, impairing comparability. The authors aimed to examine the metrics and methods used to measure medical student wellbeing across multiple timepoints and identify where guidance is necessary. METHODS: Five databases were searched between May and June 2021 for studies using survey-based metrics among medical students at multiple timepoints. Screening and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. Data regarding the manuscript, methodology, and metrics were analyzed. RESULTS: 221 studies were included, with 109 observational and 112 interventional studies. There were limited studies (15.4%) focused on clinical students. Stress management interventions were the most common (40.2%). Few (3.57%) interventional studies followed participants longer than 12 months, and 38.4% had no control group. There were 140 unique metrics measuring 13 constructs. 52.1% of metrics were used only once. CONCLUSIONS: Unique guidance is needed to address gaps in study design as well as unique challenges surrounding medical student wellbeing surveys. Metric use is highly variable and future research is necessary to identify metrics specifically validated in medical student samples that reflect the diversity of today's students.

Pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women exposed to physician-related occupational hazards: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence is needed to guide organisational decision making about workplace accommodations for pregnant physicians. Our objective was to characterise the strengths and limitations of current research examining the association between physician-related occupational hazards with pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL/ EBSCO, SciVerse Scopus and Web of Science/Knowledge were searched from inception to 2 April 2020. A grey literature search was performed on 5 April 2020. The references of all included articles were hand searched for additional citations. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language citations that studied employed pregnant people and any 'physician-related occupational hazards', meaning any relevant physical, infectious, chemical or psychological hazard, were included. Outcomes included any pregnancy, obstetrical or neonatal complication. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Physician-related occupational hazards included physician work, healthcare work, long work hours, 'demanding' work, disordered sleep, night shifts and exposure to radiation, chemotherapy, anaesthetic gases or infectious disease. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and reconciled through discussion. RESULTS: Of the 316 included citations, 189 were original research studies. Most were retrospective, observational and included women in any occupation rather than healthcare workers. Methods for exposure and outcome ascertainment varied across studies and most studies had a high risk of bias in data ascertainment. Most exposures and outcomes were defined categorically and results from different studies could not be combined in a meta-analysis due to heterogeneity in how these categories were defined. Overall, some data suggested that healthcare workers may have an increased risk of miscarriage compared with other employed women. Long work hours may be associated with miscarriage and preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: There are important limitations in the current evidence examining physician-related occupational hazards and adverse pregnancy, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. It is not clear how the medical workplace should be accommodated to improve outcomes for pregnant physicians. High-quality studies are needed and likely feasible.

Experiences of breastfeeding among women residents in Alberta: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: Breastfeeding at work is recommended by pediatric society guidelines and is protected by employment and human rights law in many countries. Despite this, previous studies have found that residents report important structural barriers to breastfeeding at work. METHOD: We administered a cross-sectional, electronic, multicenter survey of all women residents in Alberta who were parents in 2017. The study aimed to characterize respondents' experiences of breastfeeding, including duration, goals, barriers, and support from colleagues. RESULTS: There were 110 respondents, of whom 53 individuals had breastfed 83 children during residency. While nearly all felt that breastfeeding was important to them, only 69.2% reported meeting their breastfeeding duration goal. Surgical residents were less likely to meet their breastfeeding duration goal than residents in other disciplines (40.0% (n = 6/15) compared to 80.0% of non-surgical (n = 28/35) and 80.0% of family medicine residents (n = 12/15)). Residents reported stopping breastfeeding earlier than they desired due to lack of adequate space (48.7%, n = 19) and lack of time (57.1%, n = 24). Twelve participants (10.9%) reported hearing a derogatory comment from a staff physician about their breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: Women residents face barriers to breastfeeding at work which require systems-level intervention. Residents from surgical programs may be the most vulnerable to these barriers. Program directors, residency wellness committees, and hospital administrators should prioritize addressing these barriers for women residents returning to work after maternity leave. Examples of interventions that may address these barriers include policies, designation of lactation spaces, and flexible return-to-work schedules.

Preparing residents to deal with human trafficking.

BACKGROUND: Victims of human trafficking (HT) are predisposed to numerous health concerns. Many encounter health care practitioners during captivity, but awareness and knowledge among front-line physicians is low. Limited data exist on attempts to address this within residency training programmes. Formal curriculum time in residency is limited and online modules may be a useful educational option. METHODS: Residents in family medicine, emergency medicine and general paediatrics at the University of Alberta were invited to participate. They completed short surveys to assess knowledge both before and after completing an online learning module either individually (n = 15) or in a facilitated session (n = 17). Baseline and post-intervention changes in self-reported and tested knowledge were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-two residents completed the pre-intervention survey: only 6% self-identified as somewhat knowledgeable on HT and 16% knew the red flags used to identify victims. Eighty-one percent wanted this topic incorporated into residency training, but only 6% and 25% had received education previously in residency or medical school, respectively. Thirteen percent were comfortable supporting victims, and 6% reported knowing how to provide support. Twenty residents completed the post-intervention survey, with improvements in both self-reported (p < 0.001) and tested (p = 0.005) knowledge of HT. Residents also reported being more prepared to identify victims (p < 0.001), more comfortable supporting victims (p < 0.001) and more confident in knowing how to support victims (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Baseline HT knowledge in residents providing first-contact care appears limited. Residency programmes should consider providing more HT education in order to improve competency in care. Although an online module was shown to be effective, protected time might be necessary for the widespread adoption of online education delivery.

Resident Physician Wellness Curriculum: A Study of Efficacy and Satisfaction.

Background Recent literature highlights the alarming prevalence of burnout, depression, and illness during residency training; a trend that is also linked to suboptimal patient care. Dedicated wellness curricula may be one solution to this concerning issue. Purpose To determine the effect of a multi-faceted wellness curriculum during emergency medicine residency training on wellness scores and to assess resident satisfaction with the program. Methods This study was conducted via a longitudinal survey. In 2009, a faculty-derived resident wellness curriculum (F-RWC) was initiated. This program was then bolstered with a parallel resident-derived curriculum (R-RWC) one year later, in 2010. Emergency medicine residents were surveyed in 2009, 2010, and 2011 to assess wellness at baseline, after one year of the F-RWC, and after one year of combined RWCs, respectively. Surveys included two validated assessment instruments (the Brief Resident Wellness Profile (BRWP) and the SF-8TM Health Survey), a satisfaction Likert scale, and a demographics information sheet. Results The survey response rates were 89% (n=17), 100% (n=17), and 83% (n=24) from 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively, for a total of 58 participants. From baseline in 2009, there was a significant improvement in resident wellness, with the addition of parallel RWC by 2011, as measured by the BRWP (p=0.024). The faces scale, a subset of the BRWP, showed a trend toward benefit but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.085). There was no evidence of a statistically significant change in SF-8TM scores over time. Participants consistently reported positive satisfaction scores with RWC initiatives. Conclusions Dedicated RWC, with input from both faculty and resident physicians, improved wellness during residency training with a high degree of participant satisfaction. Such programs are needed to support resident physicians during their training.

Sleep and Exercise in Emergency Medicine Residents: An Observational Pilot Study Exploring the Utility of Wearable Activity Monitors for Monitoring Wellness.

Introduction Burnout is well-documented in residents and emergency physicians. Wellness initiatives are becoming increasingly prevalent, but there is a lack of data supporting their efficacy. In some populations, a relationship between sleep, exercise, and wellness has been documented; however, this relationship has not been established in emergency medicine (EM) residents or physicians. We aim to determine whether a wearable activity monitor is a feasible method of evaluating exercise and sleep quality and quantity in emergency medicine residents and if these assessments are associated with greater perceived wellness. Methods Twenty EM residents from two training sites wore a wearable activity monitor (Fitbit ChargeTM, Fitbit, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) during a four-week EM rotation. The Fitbit recorded data on sleep quantity (minutes sleeping) and quality (sleep disruptions), as well as exercise quantity and quality (daily step count, daily active minutes performing activity of 3 - 6, and > 6 metabolic equivalents). Participants completed an end-of-rotation Perceived Wellness Survey (PWS), which provided information on six domains of personal wellness (psychological, emotional, social, physical, spiritual, and intellectual). PWS levels were compared between groups of subjects with higher or lower levels of activity and sleep (i.e., above and below the median subject-averaged values) using the Mann-Whitney U test. Other subject characteristics were similarly assessed for their association with PWS. When a possible confounding effect was seen, the data was stratified and reviewed using a scatterplot. Results Of the 28 eligible residents, 23 agreed to participate. Of these, 20 and 16 wore the device for at least 50% of the respective days and nights during the observation period. Two devices were lost. One PWS was not completed. There was no statistically significant correlation between resident perceived wellness survey scores, sleep interruptions, average daily sleep minutes, daily step count, or average daily active minutes for the sample overall. However, first-year residents and residents from years two to five reported different median PWS scores of 13.9 and 17.1, respectively. Further exploration by the training group suggested that step counts may correlate with wellness in participants in their first year of residency, while the quantity of sleep may have an association with wellness in participants in years two through five of their residency. Conclusion Using wearable activity monitor devices to capture sleep and exercise data among residents does not seem to be an effective approach. Our data does not support our hypothesis that overall resident wellness was associated with exercise and sleep quality and quantity as measured by such a device. These results are counterintuitive and may be complicated by several measurement-related limitations and the possibility that benefits depend on the stage of training.