Characteristics of Ischemic Stroke Despite Oral Anticoagulant Use For Atrial Fibrillation.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) prevents stroke in atrial fibrillation, yet a residual stroke risk remains. In this single-center retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke patients despite OAC, suboptimal OAC treatment is common (30%: inappropriate dosing (17%); patient non-adherence (13%)). Other causes of stroke included OAC interruption (14.5%), a competing stroke mechanism (11.0%), and undetermined breakthrough stroke in 44.5%. Overall, easily modifiable causes of ischemic stroke despite OAC are common. Accordingly, strategies to improve treatment compliance, including appropriate dosing along with guideline-based risk factor and periprocedural OAC management, should be emphasized to improve secondary stroke prevention in this patient population.

Successful thrombectomy is beneficial in patients with pre-stroke disability: Results from an international multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pre-stroke disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3, were excluded from most trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute stroke. We sought to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with favorable outcome in stroke patients with known disability undergoing EVT, and the impact of successful reperfusion. METHODS: Consecutive acute stroke patients with pre-stroke disability, undergoing EVT, were retrospectively collected between 2016 to 2019 from a Canadian cohort and a multicenter French cohort (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry-ETIS). Favorable outcome was defined as an mRS equal to pre-stroke mRS. Patients achieving successful reperfusion (defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3) were compared with patients without successful reperfusion to determine if successful EVT was associated with better functional outcomes. RESULTS: Among 6220 patients treated with EVT, 280 (4.5%) patients with a pre-stroke mRS ≥3 were included. Sixty-one patients (21.8%) had a favorable outcome and 146 (52.1%) died at 3 months. Patients with successful reperfusion had a higher proportion of favorable 90-day mRS (27.6% versus 19.6%, p = 0.025) and a lower mortality (48.3% versus 69.6%, p = 0.008) than patients without successful reperfusion. After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, successful reperfusion defined by TICI ≥2b was associated with favorable functional outcome (OR 3.16 CI95% [1.11-11.5]; p 0.048). CONCLUSION: In patients with pre-stroke disability, successful reperfusion is associated with a greater proportion of favorable outcome and lower mortality.

Predictors of Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients Aged ≥85 Years.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in elderly stroke patients remains debated. We aimed to describe outcomes and their predictors in a cohort of patients aged ≥ 85 years treated with MT. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients aged ≥ 85 years undergoing MT at two stroke centers between January 2016 and November 2019 were reviewed. Admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), pre-stroke, and 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) were collected. Successful recanalization was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia score ≥ 2b. Good outcome was defined as mRS 0-3 or equal to pre-stroke mRS at 3 months. RESULTS: Of 151 included patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 74.2%. At 3 months, 44.7% of patients had a good outcome and 39% had died. Any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH occurred in 20.3% and 3.6%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified lower pre-stroke mRS score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.76), lower admission NIHSS score (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97), successful recanalization (aOR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.32-10.09), and absence of ICH on follow-up imaging (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.08-0.75), to be independent predictors of good outcome. Patients with successful recanalization had a higher proportion of good outcome (45.3% vs 34.3%, p = 0.013) and lower mortality at 3 months (35.8% vs 48.6%, p = 0.006) compared to patients with unsuccessful recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients aged ≥ 85 years, successful recanalization with MT is relatively common and associated with better 3-month outcome and lower mortality than failed recanalization. Attempting to achieve recanalization in elderly patients using MT appears reasonable.

Prospective Evaluation of a Two-Scale Protocol for Prehospital Large Vessel Occlusion Detection.

Background and purposes: Stroke severity scales may expedite prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke detection, but few are validated for paramedic use. We evaluated the feasibility of introducing the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT) in the field and its capacity to detect LVO stroke.Methods: We performed a prospective paramedic-based study assessing C-STAT in the field on patients currently redirected to two comprehensive stroke centers (CSC), based on a Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) score of 3/3. C-STAT was administered by on-site paramedics with telephone guidance from trained centralized clinical support paramedics.Results: Between October 2018 and November 2019, C-STAT scores were obtained in 188/218 (86.2%) patients, among which 118/188 (62.8%) were positive. Paramedics reported performing the C-STAT in less than 5 minutes on 170/188 (90.4%) patients and noted no difficulties administering the scale in 151/188 (80.3%). A positive C-STAT identified 51/68 (75%) LVO strokes in the cohort, demonstrating a 43% (95% CI: 38%-48%) positive and 76% (95% CI: 66%-83%) negative predictive value for LVO stroke diagnosis. In a cohort of 100 patients with CPSS 3/3, requiring a positive C-STAT for redirection would decrease CSC patient volume by 37 but miss 9 of 36 LVO strokes.Conclusion: Prehospital administration of the C-STAT was feasible, using a model of minimal paramedic training and real-time telephone guidance. A protocol based on both a CPSS 3/3 and a positive C-STAT would decrease CSC redirected patient volume by one-third but would miss one-quarter of LVO strokes when compared to a CPSS-based protocol.

Three-month functional outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a Canadian single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted acute stroke care logistics, including delays in hyperacute management and decreased monitoring following endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on 90-day functional outcome among patients treated with EVT. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study including all patients evaluated for an acute stroke between March 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020 (pandemic cohort) and 2019 (reference cohort) in a high-volume Canadian academic stroke center. We collected baseline characteristics, acute reperfusion treatment and management metrics. For EVT-treated patients, we assessed the modified Rankin score (mRS) at 90 days. We evaluated the impact of the pandemic on a 90-day favourable functional status (defined as mRS 0-2) and death using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Among 383 and 339 patients included in the pandemic and reference cohorts, baseline characteristics were similar. Delays from symptom onset to evaluation and in-house treatment were longer during the early first wave, but returned to reference values in the subsequent months. Among the 127 and 136 EVT-treated patients in each respective cohort, favourable 90-day outcome occurred in 53/99 (53%) vs 52/109 (48%, p=0.40), whereas 22/99 (22%) and 28/109 (26%, p=0.56) patients died. In multivariable regressions, the pandemic period was not associated with 90-day favourable functional status (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.56) or death (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.63). CONCLUSION: In this single-center cohort study conducted in a Canadian pandemic epicenter, the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact 90-day functional outcomes or death among EVT-treated patients.

Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Stroke Treatment Delays.

This is an observational cohort study comparing 156 patients evaluated for acute stroke between March 30 and May 31, 2020 at a comprehensive stroke center with 138 patients evaluated during the corresponding time period in 2019. During the pandemic, the proportion of COVID-19 positive patients was low (3%), the time from symptom onset to hospital presentation was significantly longer, and a smaller proportion of patients underwent reperfusion therapy. Among patients directly evaluated at our institution, door-to-needle and door-to-recanalization metrics were significantly longer. Our findings support concerns that the current pandemic may have a negative impact on the management of acute stroke.

Streamlined Poststroke Treatment Order Sets During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Simplifying While Not Compromising Care.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Standard poststroke treatment monitoring protocols are made problematic during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by the frequency of patient assessments, requiring repeated donning and doffing procedures in a short interval of time. METHODS: A streamlined poststroke treatment protocol was developed to limit frequency of patient encounters while maximizing the yield of each encounter by grouping together different components of poststroke care into single bedside visits. RESULTS: Streamlined order sets were developed late March 2020. During the first 6 weeks following implementation, 70 patients were admitted to a geographically defined designated warm COVID-19 unit with modified poststroke care order sets. Of these, 33 (47.1%) patients received acute reperfusion therapy. All but 3 patients evolved favorably with either stable or improving National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours. In the 3 patients who experienced early neurological deterioration, none were found to be attributable to insufficient patient monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting preexisting poststroke care protocols may be necessary while the risk of COVID-19 infection remains high. We propose a streamlined approach to facilitate poststroke monitoring in patients with stroke with unknown COVID status.

Non-Contrast CT and CT-Angiogram for Late Window Ischemic Stroke Treatment Selection.

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of late window endovascular treatment (EVT) for anterior circulation ischemic stroke has been demonstrated using perfusion-based neuroimaging. We evaluated whether non-contrast CT (NCCT) and CT-angiogram (CTA) alone can select late-presenting patients for EVT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparison of all patients undergoing EVT at a single comprehensive stroke center from January 2016 to April 2017. Patients planned for EVT were divided into early (<6 hours from onset) and late (≥6 hours from onset or last time seen normal) window groups. Incidence of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformations (sHTs) at 24 hours and 3-month modified Rankin scores (mRSs) were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 204 (82%) patients underwent EVT in the early and 44 (18%) in the late window. Median (interquartile range) NIH Stroke Scale Score was similar between groups (early: 18 [15-23] vs. late: 17 [13-21]), as were median ASPECT scores (early: 9 [8-10] vs. late: 9 [7-9]). In the late window, 42 (95%) strokes were of unknown onset. Similar proportions of sHT occurred at 24 hours (early: 12 [6%] vs. late: 4 [9%], p = 0.43). At 3 months, the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (mRS 0-2) were comparable in the early (80/192 [42%]) and late (16/41 [39%]) windows (p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: NCCT- and CTA-based patient selection led to similar functional independence outcomes and low proportions of sHT in the early and late windows. In centers without access to perfusion-based neuroimaging, this pragmatic approach could be safe, particularly for strokes of unknown onset.

A randomized pilot study of patients with tandem carotid lesions undergoing thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal management of patients with tandem lesions (TL), or cervical internal carotid artery (c-ICA) steno-occlusive pathology and ipsilateral intracranial occlusion, who are undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains unknown. We sought to establish the feasibility of a trial designed to address this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention (EASI) study was a single-centre randomized trial comparing EVT to medical therapy for large-vessel occlusion stroke. Patients with TL receiving EVT were randomly allocated to acute c-ICA stenting or no stenting. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) at 24hours and mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: Of 301 patients included in EASI between 2013 and 2018, 24 (8.0%) with TL were randomly allocated to acute stenting (n=13) or no stenting (n=11). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Eight (61.5%; 95% CI 35.5%-82.3%) and 7 (63.6%; 95% CI 35.4%-84.9%) patients, respectively, had a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2; P=1.0). One non-stented patient had a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial of patients with TL undergoing EVT suggests that a sufficiently powered larger TL trial comparing acute c-ICA stenting to no stenting is feasible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02157532.

Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale for EMS Redirection of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke may expedite treatment by direct transport to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) with endovascular capabilities. The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is commonly used for prehospital stroke detection. We aimed to assess whether (1) a high CPSS score can identify LVO and (2) an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) redirection protocol based on high CPSS accelerated endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: A retrospective comparison of patients transported by EMSs for suspected stroke to a high-volume CSC over a 16-month period, before and after implementation of an EMS redirection protocol based on high CPSS score (3/3). Charts were reviewed to determine the presence of LVO. Time to EVT and 3-month outcomes were compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: A prehospital CPSS 3/3 score was found in 223 (59%) patients, demonstrating positive and negative predictive values for LVO of 29% and 94%, respectively. CPSS-based EMS redirection increased the proportion of EVT performed after direct transport to CSC [before: 21 (36%), after: 45 (63%), p < 0.01] and decreased median first door-to-groin puncture time by 28 minutes [109 (interquartile range (IQR) 64-116) versus 81 (IQR 56-130), p = 0.03]. At 3 months, the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin score 0-2) went from 20/57 (35%) to 29/68 (43%) (p = 0.39) following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: CPSS-based EMS redirection accelerated identification of LVO strokes in the out-of-hospital setting and decreased time to EVT. Nevertheless, this protocol was also associated with high rates of non-LVO stroke. Impact on clinical outcomes should be evaluated in a larger cohort.

Utilité de l'échelle de Cincinnati pour la redirection des occlusions artérielles cérébrales proximales par les services médicaux d'urgence. Introduction : Dans un contexte pré-hospitalier, le fait de pouvoir identifier l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux peut accélérer l'amorce d'un traitement en favorisant un transfert direct vers un centre complet de prise en charge des AVC (comprehensive stroke centers) doté de moyens d'intervention endovasculaire. L'échelle de Cincinnati (Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale ou CPSS) est couramment utilisée afin de détecter les signes d'un AVC dans un contexte pré-hospitalier. Notre intention est double ici : 1) évaluer dans quelle mesure un score élevé à la CPSS peut permettre d'identifier l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux ; 2) évaluer dans quelle mesure un protocole des services médicaux d'urgence consistant à rediriger des patients en fonction d'un score élevé à la CPSS a permis d'accélérer l'offre d'un traitement endovasculaire. Méthodes : Au cours d'une période de 16 mois, soit avant et après la mise sur pied de ce protocole en fonction d'un score élevé à la CPSS (3/3), nous avons effectué une comparaison rétrospective des dossiers de patients transportés vers des centres complets de prise en charge des AVC en raison de soupçons d'AVC. Ces dossiers ont été analysés afin de pouvoir identifier les cas d'occlusion proximales. Enfin, les délais permettant d'obtenir un traitement endovasculaire et l'évolution de l'état de santé des patients au bout de 3 mois ont été comparés avant et après la mise sur pied de ce protocole. Résultats : En fonction d'un score de 3/3 à la CPSS obtenu en contexte pré-hospitalier a été observé chez 223 patients (59 %), la valeur prédictive positive et négative pour des cas d'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux étant respectivement de 29 % et de 94 %. Le fait que les services médicaux d'urgence redirigent des patients en fonction d'un certain score à la CPSS a fini par augmenter le nombre de traitements endovasculaires prodigués à la suite d'un transfert direct vers un centre complet de prise en charge des AVC (avant le protocole : 21 (36 %) ; après le protocole : 45 (63 %) ; p < 0,01) et par diminuer de 28 minutes les délais entre la prise en charge à l'arrivée et la ponction artérielle (109 [intervalle interquartile de 64-116] contre 81 [intervalle interquartile de 56-130] ; p = 0,03). Au bout de 3 mois, à la suite de la mise sur pied du protocole, la proportion de patients autonomes sur le plan fonctionnel (échelle de Rankin modifiée : 0-2) est passée de 20/57 (35 %) à 29/68 (43 %) (p = 0,39). Conclusion : Le fait de rediriger des patients en fonction d'un certain score à la CPSS a permis d'accélérer la détection de cas d'AVC survenus à la suite de l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux et donc de réduire les temps d'intervention. Cela dit, ce protocole a aussi été associé à un taux élevé de détection d'AVC non produits par l'occlusion de vaisseaux sanguins cérébraux proximaux. L'impact de cette constatation en ce qui regarde l'évolution de l'état de santé des patients devrait être évalué dans une plus vaste cohorte.

Lack of Consensus Among Stroke Experts on the Optimal Management of Patients With Acute Tandem Occlusion.

Background and Purpose- In patients with acute stroke caused by tandem occlusion, the benefit of immediate revascularization (stenting) of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion during endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain. We sought to determine current practice patterns and whether consensus existed among physicians with stroke expertise. Methods- We distributed an online survey to stroke experts affiliated with the Canadian Stroke Consortium, the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, and international ESCAPE trial (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times) collaborators. Questions were based on clinical scenarios, and multiple choice responses across a Likert-type scale were provided. The survey was sent out in September 2017. After 2 months, data were extracted and then analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results- Responses from 162 stroke experts were analyzed; most were stroke physicians (n=65, 40.1%) and neurointerventionalists (n=74, 45.7%), from Canada (n=95, 58.6%), the United States (n=42, 25.9%), and other countries (n=25, 15.4%). Over half (n=96, 59.3%) of respondents consider acute stenting of the cervical internal carotid artery as a treatment option, whereas 40.7% (n=66) would never use it. Most respondents (n=113, 69.8%) agree that there exists uncertainty about the optimal acute management of patients with tandem occlusion. A majority (n=88, 54.3%) of physicians surveyed would include patients in a randomized trial addressing this question. Conclusions- This survey shows high variability in practice about acute management of tandem occlusion. The existence of community equipoise underscores the importance of a randomized trial evaluating the benefit of acute internal carotid artery stenting in patients with tandem occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

A randomized pragmatic care trial on endovascular acute stroke interventions (EASI): criticisms, responses, and ethics of integrating research and clinical care.

BACKGROUND: The Endovascular Acute Stroke Intervention (EASI) trial was conceived as a pragmatic care trial, designed to integrate trial methods with clinical practice. Reporting the EASI experience was met with objections and criticisms during peer review concerning both scientific and ethical issues. Our goal is to discuss these criticisms in order to promote the pragmatic approach of care trials in outcome-based medical care. METHODS: The comments and criticisms of 11 reviewers from 5 journals were collected and analyzed. The EASI protocol was also compared to the protocols of seven thrombectomy trials using the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS). RESULTS: Main criticisms of EASI concerned selection criteria that were judged to be too vague and too inclusive, brain and vascular imaging methods that were not sufficiently prescribed by protocol, lack of blinding of outcome assessment, and lack of power. EASI was at the pragmatic end of the spectrum of thrombectomy trials. CONCLUSION: The pragmatic care trial methodology is not currently well-established. More work needs to be done to integrate scientific methods and ethical care in the best medical interest of current patients.

Endovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: A randomized care trial.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, the benefits of endovascular treatment in stroke were not proven. Care trials have been designed to simultaneously offer yet-to-be validated interventions and verify treatment outcomes. Our aim was to implement a care trial for patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: The study was offered to all patients considered for endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke in one Canadian hospital. Inclusion criteria were broad: onset of symptoms≤5h or at any time in the presence of clinical-imaging mismatch and suspected or demonstrated proximal large vessel occlusion. Exclusion criteria were few: established infarction or hemorrhagic transformation of the target symptomatic territory and poor 3-month prognosis. The primary outcome was mRS≤2 at 3 months. Patients were randomly allocated to standard care or standard care plus endovascular treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier NCT02157532. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were recruited in 19 months (March 2013-October 2014) at a single center. Randomized allocation was interrupted when other trials showed the benefits of endovascular therapy. At 3 months, 20 of 40 patients (50.0%; 95% CI: 35%-65%) in the intervention group had reached the primary outcome, compared to 14 of 37 patients (37.8%; 95% CI: 24%-54%) in the control group (P=0.36). Eleven patients in the intervention group died within 3 months compared to 9 patients in the standard care group. CONCLUSION: A care trial was implemented to offer verifiable care to acute stroke patients. This approach offers a promising means to manage clinical dilemmas and guide uncertain practices.

Early CT changes in patients admitted for thrombectomy: Intrarater and interrater agreement.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature and assess agreement on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) among clinicians involved in the management of thrombectomy candidates. METHODS: Studies assessing agreement using ASPECTS published from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Fifteen raters reviewed and scored the anonymized CT scans of 30 patients recruited in a local thrombectomy trial during 2 independent sessions, in order to study intrarater and interrater agreement. Agreement was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Fleiss kappa statistics for ASPECTS and dichotomized ASPECTS at various cutoff values. RESULTS: The review yielded 30 articles reporting 40 measures of agreement. Populations, methods, analyses, and results were heterogeneous (slight to excellent agreement), precluding a meta-analysis. When analyzed as a categorical variable, intrarater agreement was slight to moderate (κ = 0.042-0.469); it reached a substantial level (κ > 0.6) in 11/15 raters when the score was dichotomized (0-5 vs 6-10). The interrater ICCs varied between 0.672 and 0.811, but agreement was slight to moderate (κ = 0.129-0.315). Even in the best of cases, when ASPECTS was dichotomized as 0-5 vs 6-10, interrater agreement did not reach a substantial level (κ = 0.561), which translates into at least 5 of 15 raters not giving the same dichotomized verdict in 15% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients considered for thrombectomy, there may be insufficient agreement between clinicians for ASPECTS to be reliably used as a criterion for treatment decisions.