ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the permeability of five desensitizing agents using computerized fluid filtration (CFF) test method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty dentin discs of 500 ± 200-mm-thick were prepared from middle dentin of bovine incisors without exposed the pulp and then randomly divided into five groups (n = 12). The permeability of the discs was measured using the CFF test method before and after application of the following desensitizers: Admira Protect (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany), Seal and Protect (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), Sensi Kill (DFL, Brazil), Systemp Desensitizer (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), BisBlock (Bisco, USA). Fluid movement measurements were made at 2-min intervals for 8 min, and a mean of the values obtained was calculated for each specimen. The results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in permeability among desensitizing agents (P > 0.05); however dentin permeability was reduced in all groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The in vitro fluid conductance of dentin discs were reduced by treating with these five desensitizing agents.
Subject(s)
Dentin Desensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin Permeability/drug effects , Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy , Dentin/drug effects , Dentinal Fluid/physiology , Acrylic Resins , Animals , Cattle , Composite Resins , Dentin Sensitivity/prevention & control , Drug Combinations , Glutaral , Methacrylates , Molar , Oxalic Acid , Polyurethanes , SiloxanesABSTRACT
Patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) have defective enamel; therefore, bonded restorations of patients with AI have variable success rates. To distinguish which cases of AI may have good clinical outcomes with bonded materials, we evaluated etching characteristics and bond strength of enamel in mouse models, comparing wild-type (WT) with those having mutations in amelogenin (Amelx) and matrix metalloproteinase-20 (Mmp20), which mimic 2 forms of human AI. Etched enamel surfaces were compared for roughness by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Bonding was compared through shear bond strength (SBS) studies with 2 different systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch). Etched enamel surfaces of incisors from Amelx knock-out (AmelxKO) mice appeared randomly organized and non-uniform compared with WT. Etching of Mmp20KO surfaces left little enamel, and the etching pattern was indistinguishable from unetched surfaces. SBS results were significantly different when AmelxKO and Mmp20KO enamel surfaces were compared. A significant increase in SBS was measured for all samples when the self-etch system was compared with the etch-and-rinse system. We have developed a novel system for testing shear bond strength of mouse incisors with AI variants, and analysis of these data may have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with AI.
Subject(s)
Amelogenesis Imperfecta/physiopathology , Amelogenin/deficiency , Dental Bonding , Dental Enamel/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Matrix Metalloproteinase 20/deficiency , Acid Etching, Dental , Amelogenesis Imperfecta/genetics , Amelogenin/physiology , Animals , Dental Enamel/metabolism , Dental Stress Analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 20/physiology , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Shear Strength , Surface PropertiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Sealing of exposed root dentinal surfaces with adhesive materials is expected to be a promising approach for preventing root dentin caries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of surface coating with all-in-one adhesives on inhibiting Streptococcus mutans biofilm attachment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bovine root dentin was cut and ground with #600-grit SiC paper. Each of the three all-in-one adhesives, Hybrid Bond (HB), Reactmer Bond (RB) or Shake One (SO) was single-coated on the dentin surfaces according to the manufacturers' instructions. The dentin surface without coating served as the control. The surface roughness of the coated and non-coated dentin surfaces was recorded by means of laser microscope measurements. S. mutans artificial biofilms were then grown on the surface of each specimen in a microcosm for 20h. The amounts of bacteria and water insoluble glucan in the retained biofilm on the surface of the specimens were measured. All numerical data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA & Tukey's HSD (p<0.05). RESULTS: All of the coated groups showed significantly lower susceptibility to biofilm attachment compared with the non-coated root dentin (p<0.05). Among the coated groups, SO showed the lowest susceptibility for biofilm formation. CONCLUSIONS: Three all-in-one adhesive materials could be effective for root surface coating. A fluoride-releasing adhesive, SO demonstrated the strongest potentiality in resisting biofilm formation.
