ABSTRACT
Insulin therapy is a fundamental component of diabetes management, yet there is often resistance to insulin initiation by both prescribers and patients. A barrier to insulin use is the perceived shortcomings with the traditional vial-and-syringe administration method (inconvenience, difficulty of use, association with disease and addiction, etc.). This symposium in the journal discusses the advantages of alternative insulin delivery methods, primarily insulin pen devices. Although these administration methods, especially insulin pens, have some clear advantages over the vial/syringe, there are also limitations to their use and careful patient selection and education are still needed.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous/instrumentation , Injections, Subcutaneous/methods , Insulin/administration & dosage , Congresses as Topic , Humans , Self Administration/instrumentation , Self Administration/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the Patient Empathy Modeling pedagogy on students' empathy towards caring for the underserved during an advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). DESIGN: Pharmacy students completing an APPE at 2 primary care clinics participated in a Patient Empathy Modeling assignment for 10 days. Each student "became the patient," simulating the life of an actual patient with multiple chronic diseases who was coping with an economic, cultural, or communication barrier to optimal healthcare. Students completed the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) before and after completing the assignment, and wrote daily journal entries and a reflection paper. ASSESSMENT: Twenty-six students completed the PEM exercises from 2005-2006. Scores on the JSPE improved. Students' comments in journals and reflection papers revealed 3 major themes: greater appreciation of the difficulty patients have with adherence to medication and treatment regimens, increased empathy for patients from different backgrounds and patients with medical and psychosocial challenges, and improved ability to apply the lessons learned in the course to their patient care roles. CONCLUSION: A Patient Empathy Modeling assignment improved pharmacy students' empathy toward underserved populations. Integrating the assignment within an APPE allowed students to immediately begin applying the knowledge and insight gained from the exercise.
Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/methods , Empathy , Professional-Patient Relations , Students, Pharmacy/psychology , Clinical Competence , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Medically Underserved Area , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Simulation , Role PlayingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of warfarin require maintaining an international normalized ratio (INR) within the therapeutic range. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of nontherapeutic INR results in patients receiving warfarin. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using 350 ambulatory care patients from a broad geographic region, all receiving long-term warfarin therapy and followed in a tertiary-care cardiology clinic. Possible predictors of nontherapeutic INR results (gender, age, body weight, body mass index, height, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, warfarin dose, therapeutic indication, regimen intensity, INR monitoring frequency/category, interacting medications, adverse events) were assessed with logistic regression models. Subset analysis involved 146 patients concurrently monitored with capillary whole blood INR (CoaguChek). RESULTS: As measured on venous specimens, 52% (182/350) of the patients had subtherapeutic INR results and 13% (44/350) had supratherapeutic INR results despite frequent (< or =4 wk) monitoring in 75% of the patients. Due to the small sample size, supratherapeutic INR results could not be further analyzed. Of 19 predictors tested, only daily warfarin dose (p < 0.02) and regimen intensity (p < 0.03) were significant independent and additive predictors of subtherapeutic results. Patients on the high-intensity regimen (INR 2.5-3.5) and receiving warfarin < or =6 mg/day had >50% risk of having subtherapeutic INR results. Subtherapeutic CoaguChek results were independent predictors of subtherapeutic venipuncture INR results in the subset (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of readily identifiable predictors, only higher warfarin dosing and/or more frequent monitoring (possibly with point-of-care/home monitoring devices) may minimize the time that INRs are subtherapeutic, especially in patients receiving low-dose and/or high-intensity anticoagulation therapy.
