Microaggression and the adult stuttering experience.

BACKGROUND: Microaggressions are subtle insults, invalidations, or slights that target people due to their association with a marginalized group. Microaggressive experiences have been shown to degrade quality of life and corroborate negative stereotypes towards persons with disabilities. To date, minimal research has been dedicated to exploring microaggressions within adults who stutter. METHODS: Seven adults who stutter participated in semi-structured focus group interviews similar to Keller and Galgay's (2010) qualitative investigation of microaggressions experienced by adults with a disability. Group interviews were transcribed and analyzed using QSR NVivo software to develop themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Eight major themes were identified within two supraordinate themes: Microaggressive Behavior (patronization, second-class status, perceived helplessness, workplace microaggression, clinical microaggression, denial of privacy) and Perception of Microaggressive Behavior (exoneration of listener, no or minimal microaggressive experience). Although patronization, second-class status, and helplessness were mentioned frequently by multiple participants, exoneration of the listener was the most frequently recurring theme. DISCUSSION: Based on these preliminary focus group interviews, stuttering-based microaggressions broadly resemble ableist microaggressions reported by Keller and Galgay (2010). Interviewees also expressed a reluctance to identify slights related to stuttering as microaggression and often characterized these incidents as unavoidable.

Segmental and metrical complexity during non-word repetition in adults who stutter.

Non-word repetition is weaker for adults who stutter (AWS) compared to adults who do not stutter (AWNS) as phonological demands increase. However, non-word stimuli used in previous studies varied by length, but did not vary with regard to segmental or metrical complexity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the unique influence of these two distinct types of complexity on non-word repetition in AWS and AWNS via administration of the Test of Phonological Structure (TOPhS). Twenty-four adults (12 AWNS, 12 AWS) repeated 96 non-words within a soundproof booth immediately after auditory presentation. All 96 non-word targets included on the TOPhS were one to four syllables in length and ranked based on segmental complexity (simple, moderate and complex) and metrical complexity (simple, moderate and complex). No main effect of metrical complexity was detected between groups, and no differences in accuracy were observed for non-words with simple or moderate segmental complexity. However, AWS were significantly more likely to produce a phonemic error when repeating words with complex segmental structure than AWNS, irrespective of metrical complexity. Segmental complexity may contribute to the differences in phonological working memory in AWS when controlling for metrical complexity and length.