Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e55623, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limiting in-person contact was a key strategy for controlling the spread of the highly infectious novel coronavirus (COVID-19). To protect patients and staff from the risk of infection while providing continued access to necessary health care services, we implemented a new electronic consultation (e-consult) service that allowed referring providers to receive subspecialty consultations for patients who are hospitalized and do not require in-person evaluation by the specialist. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of implementing e-consults in the inpatient setting to reduce avoidable face-to-face referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This quality improvement study evaluated all inpatient e-consults ordered from July 2020 to December 2022 at the University of California Irvine Medical Center. The impact of e-consults was assessed by evaluating use (eg, number of e-consults ordered), e-consult response times, and outcome of the e-consult requests (eg, resolved electronically or converted to the in-person evaluation of patient). RESULTS: There were 1543 inpatient e-consults ordered across 11 participating specialties. A total of 53.5% (n=826) of requests were addressed electronically, without the need for a formal in-person evaluation of the patient. The median time between ordering an e-consult and a specialist documenting recommendations in an e-consult note was 3.7 (IQR 1.3-8.2) hours across all specialties, contrasted with 7.3 (IQR 3.6-22.0) hours when converted to an in-person consult (P<.001). The monthly volume of e-consult requests increased, coinciding with surges of COVID-19 cases in California. After the peaks of the COVID-19 crisis subsided, the use of inpatient e-consults persisted at a rate well above the precrisis levels. CONCLUSIONS: An inpatient e-consult service was successfully implemented, resulting in fewer unnecessary face-to-face consultations and significant reductions in the response times for consults requested on patients who are hospitalized and do not require an in-person evaluation. Thus, e-consults provided timely, efficient delivery of inpatient consultation services for appropriate problems while minimizing the risk of direct transmission of the COVID-19 virus between health care providers and patients. The service also demonstrated its value as a tool for effective inpatient care coordination beyond the peaks of the pandemic leading to the sustainability of service and value.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Quality Improvement , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Inpatients , Referral and Consultation , SARS-CoV-2 , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine , California
2.
JAMIA Open ; 5(3): ooac060, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35879961

ABSTRACT

Objective: In order to manage COVID-19 patient population and bed capacity issues, remote patient monitoring (RPM) is a strategy used to transition patients from inpatients to home. We describe our RPM implementation process for post-acute care COVID-19 pneumonia patients. We also evaluate the impact of RPM on patient outcomes, including hospital length of stay (LOS), post-discharge Emergency Department (ED) visits, and hospital readmission. Materials and Methods: We utilized a cloud-based RPM platform (Vivify Health) and a nurse-monitoring service (Global Medical Response) to enroll COVID-19 patients who required oxygen supplementation after hospital discharge. We evaluated patient participation, biometric alerts, and provider communication. We also assessed the program's impact by comparing RPM patient outcomes with a retrospective cohort of Control patients who similarly required oxygen supplementation after discharge but were not referred to the RPM program. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the 2 groups' demographic characteristics, hospital LOS, and readmission rates. Results: The RPM program enrolled 75 patients with respondents of a post-participation survey reporting high satisfaction with the program. Compared to the Control group (n = 150), which had similar demographics and baseline characteristics, the RPM group was associated with shorter hospital LOS (median 4.8 vs 6.1 days; P=.03) without adversely impacting return to the ED or readmission. Conclusion: We implemented a RPM program for post-acute discharged COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen supplementation. Our RPM program resulted in a shorter hospital LOS without adversely impacting quality outcomes for readmission rates and improved healthcare utilization by reducing the average LOS.

4.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(4): 438-43, 2016 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26717872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) continue to cause preventable morbidity and mortality, but methods for tracking and ensuring consistency of CLABSI-prevention activities remain underdeveloped. METHODS: We created an integrated electronic health record solution to prompt sterile central venous catheter (CVC) insertion, CVC tracking, and timely line removal. The system embedded central line insertion practices (CLIP) elements in inserter procedure notes, captured line days and new lines, matching each with its CLIP form and feeding back compliance, and enforced daily documentation of line necessity in physician progress notes. We examined changes in CLIP compliance and form submission, number of new line insertions captured, and necessary documentation. RESULTS: Standard reporting of CLIP compliance, which measures compliance per CLIP form received, artificially inflated CLIP compliance relative to compliance measured using CVC placements as the denominator; for example, 99% per CLIP form versus 55% per CVC placement. This system established a higher threshold for CLIP compliance using this denominator. Identification of CVCs increased 35%, resulting in a decrease in CLABSI rates. The system also facilitated full compliance with daily documentation of line necessity. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated electronic health records systems can help realize the full benefit of CLABSI prevention strategies by promoting, tracking, and raising the standard for best practices behavior.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Electronic Health Records , Infection Control/methods , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/prevention & control , Checklist , Humans
5.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 42(5): 89-99, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25485921

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It results in approximately 300 000 deaths in the United States each year, and two thirds of VTE events are hospital acquired. However, VTE prophylaxis for hospitalized patients remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVES: Assess the effect of a physician-mandated VTE prophylaxis computerized order set on the rates of hospital acquired VTE. METHODS: A retrospective prevalence study of hospitalized patients pre- and postimplementation of a mandatory VTE order set. Additionally, the Joint Commission VTE Core Measures data was tracked for improvements postimplementation. RESULTS: At baseline, 73% of patients received appropriate prophylaxis (n = 148) compared with 90% (n = 192) postintervention (P = 0.015). The percentage of patients who received VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital increased from a baseline of 73% to 93% postimplementation (P = 0.0004). Hospital-acquired VTE prevalence rates decreased from 2% (4 cases) to 0.05% (1 case; P = 0.37) post intervention. The incidence of potentially preventable VTE cases (the Joint Commission's core measure 6) decreased from 3.9% to 0% (P = 0.39). These differences were not statistically significant, but they are clinically significant. These results were also sustained over time. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a mandated physician VTE order set ensures that nearly all patients will be stratified for VTE risk and provided with prophylaxis based on their risk category. Adhering to the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians is effective in improving prophylaxis and decreasing the rate of hospital-acquired VTE in hospitalized patients, and in decreasing the rate of preventable VTE cases based on the Joint Commission's core measure 6.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Clinical Protocols , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Medical Order Entry Systems/statistics & numerical data , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Incidence , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...