Outcomes of Kidney Transplantations Under the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation's Type Z Benefit Package at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Philippines.

BACKGROUND: Under the Universal Health Care Program of the Department of Health, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) launched the Case Type Z benefit package for kidney transplantation, providing the largest amount (USD $13,300.00) for any single medical procedure. The objective of this study was to describe under the PHIC Case Type Z Benefit Package for kidney transplantation at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute and kidney transplantation outcomes under this package. METHODS: Included in the benefit were standard risk recipients between 10 and 70 years of age with at least 1 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR match with the donor, panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 20%, and absence of donor-specific antibody (DSA). Previous transplantations, malignancy, hepatitis B and C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity, cytomegalovirus (CMV) R-/D+, congestive heart failure, and liver cirrhosis were exclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated by a medical social worker according to their family's financial status. RESULTS: Since June 2012, a total of 261 patients have received the benefit, with 44 under service, 37 with fixed co-pay and 180 with variable co-pay. Of the living donor kidney transplants, 98% had immediate graft function, with 2.3% (6/261) acute rejection rates at 1 year. The total cost of hospitalization was within the benefit for living donor kidney transplants (less than USD 8000.00) but exceeded it in all cases of deceased donor kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS: The successful use of and excellent outcomes under the Case Type Z benefit demonstrated how collaboration among government agencies, health care providers, and pharmaceutical companies could result in a program that improved the access to health care for Filipino patients with end-stage renal disease.

Outcome of referrals for deceased organ donation to the government organ procurement organization.

BACKGROUND: The Human Organ Preservation Effort is a government organ procurement organization that pioneered the Deceased Organ Donation Program in the Philippines. Deceased organ donation comprises only 20% of kidney transplantation in the Philippines in the last 3 years. Various measures were implemented to improve deceased organ donor referrals and organ retrieval. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome of deceased organ donor referrals from 2002 to 2008 and 2009 to 2012 in the Philippines. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the deceased organ donor referrals from 2002 to 2008 and 2009 to 2012. RESULTS: There were 437 referrals for potential deceased organ donors from 2009 to 2012, compared to 434 referrals from 2002 to 2008. Referrals were mainly trauma victims (76%) followed by those with cerebrovascular accidents (12%). In the recent cohort, 81% were approached and 60% consented for donation, but only 23% were retrieved and transplanted. Among those not retrieved, the majority (19%) were medically unsuitable and 6% retracted their consent. CONCLUSION: Although there was an increasing trend of organ donation referrals in the last 4 years, only 25% were procured. The reasons for nonprocurement should be addressed.

Pilot study on the efficacy and safety of generic mycophenolate mofetil (Mycept) compared with Cellcept among incident low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.

AIM: The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy and safety of generic mycophenolate mofetil (Mycept) and determine the bioequivalence with Cellcept. This will provide patients an alternative cost-effective option that may improve compliance and long-term outcome. METHODS: This was a comparative study between 2 nonconcurrent matched groups on Mycept and Cellcept. A total of 56 patients were included based on criteria (20 incidental patients on Mycept, matched to 20 historical patients on Cellcept, and 16 additional incidental patients on Cellcept). Patient and graft survival and safety parameters were reviewed at 6 months. Bioequivalence of Mycept with Cellcept was done by measuring area under the curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid (MPA), maximum concentration, and time to maximum concentration for 16 patients in each group. RESULTS: Twenty incidental Mycept patients completed 6 months of follow-up. No significant difference was observed in survival (P = 1.0), graft function (P = .2320), and rejection episodes (P = .6250) between groups. The most common side effect of Mycept was hematologic and infectious. The MPA AUC of Mycept (37.38 ng/mL) was within the recommended MPA of 30-60 ng/mL. The maximum concentration (6.06 ng/mL) and time to maximum concentration (1.19 hours) of the 10 Mycept patients were not significantly different from the 10 Cellcept patients. CONCLUSION: There was no proven statistically significant difference between Mycept and Cellcept in efficacy and graft survival at 6 months after kidney transplantation. Hematologic side effects were noted more frequently among patients on Mycept and monitoring regularly is recommended.

National survey of Filipinos on acceptance of incentivized organ donation.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of patients requiring transplantation has brought about a shortage of donor kidneys. Incentives can potentially improve organ donation. There is a need to know if the public can accept incentivized organ donation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate knowledge and opinions on organ donation and compensating the donor/donor family and to determine factors affecting consent. METHODS: The third survey in 2009 covered 15 regions, 29 provinces, and 14 cities in the National Capital Region. There were 1500 respondents interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Analysis used Statistical Package for Social Science and chi-square. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 63% were females and 74% were married. Nearly half were between 26 and 45 years old. Fewer than 5% were unschooled. Monthly household income was less than USD $222.00 in 70% of respondents. A majority knew about donation from 2001 to 2009. Fewer than 20% knew about deceased donors. Those who wanted to become donors decreased. Sixty-five percent were willing to donate a brain-dead relative's organs. Respondents felt that kidney donors deserve a token of gratitude. Options included livelihood (32%), cash (31%), and educational assistance (26%). Sixty percent wanted the donor assistance termed a "token of gratitude." Consent for donation was positively correlated (P < .05) with higher education and monthly income. CONCLUSION: Awareness on organ transplantation and donation increased. Factors that promote organ donation are higher education and monthly income. A majority of Filipinos felt that the donor deserves a token of gratitude. Public acceptance of incentivized organ donation may be pursued. Strategies to improve the national advocacy campaign for deceased donation are needed.

Safety and efficacy of generic cyclosporine arpimune in Filipino low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: In the Philippines, maintenance of immunosuppression may not always be affordable, leading to acute rejection and graft loss. The availability of the generic cyclosporine Arpimune could be economically beneficial, but its safety and efficacy should be established. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 30 renal transplant patients who received Arpimune with mycophenolate/prednisone. Their results were compared up to 6 months with 30 matched control patients who received Neoral during the same period. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) after intake of Arpimune and therapeutic drug monitoring using cyclosporine levels 2 hours after each dose were done. Pearson correlation was performed to determine linearity of relationship between the generic cyclosporine concentrations and AUC 0-4. Chi-square test was used in obtaining cyclosporine Arpimune concentrations. RESULTS: The abbreviated concentration AUC of Arpimune was similar to that of Neoral, and the 2-hour sampling point (r = 0.813; P < .001) showed the best correlation. Calculated creatinine clearance (mL/min) versus Neoral was 71.36 ± 13 versus 68.03 ± 16.6 (P = .61) at 1 month, 70.4 ± 14.8 versus 64.2 ± 11.4 (P = .12) at 3 months, and 74.02 ± 15.8 versus 62.03 ± 12.1 (P = .002) at 6 months. Two Arpimune versus 4 Neoral patients (P = .67) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection. One septic death occurred in the Arpimune group. Graft survival was 100% in both groups. Hyperlipidemia was the most frequent side effect for both. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC of Arpimune was similar to that of Neoral. Use of the generic cyclosporine Arpimune provided effective immunosuppression in the 6 months after transplantation. Renal allograft function was similar to that of Neoral, with minimal rates of acute rejection and adverse events.

Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine versus full-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate in de novo renal transplant patients: a 2-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has improved short-term graft survival, long-term function remains a challenge. CNIs have been implicated in the development of chronic allograft failure. Low-dose cyclosporine with everolimus may mitigate CNI nephrotoxicity and prolong graft survival. We compared the efficacy and safety of de novo everolimus with low-dose cyclosporine and prednisone versus cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and prednisone among kidney transplant patients up to 24 months after transplantation. METHODS: Kidney transplant patients given low-dose cyclosporine, everolimus, and prednisone were compared with patients given cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and prednisone from December 2006 to December 2008. All had living donors, panel reactive antibody <15%, and follow-up for 2 years after transplantation. Continuous variables using mean and standard deviation, t test and test for proportions were used to determine significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups. Generalized linear regression and logistic regression were used to measure the effect of treatment on outcomes. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups except for age, length of time awaiting kidney transplantation, type of renal replacement therapy, follow-up time, sex distribution, and number of HLA mismatches. These independent variables were used in the generalized linear regression model. There was no significant difference between the everolimus and mycophenolate groups up to 2 years in mean serum creatinine (1.2 mg/dL vs 1.4 mg/dL-, respectively P ≥ .05), acute rejection (12 months: 20% vs 31%; 24 months: 31% vs 40%; P ≥ .05), patient survival (98%), and graft survival (100%). Likewise, there were no significant differences in surgical, infectious, metabolic, and gastrointestinal side effects between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus with low-dose cyclosporine and prednisone in de novo kidney transplant recipients was similar in efficacy and safety to cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Longer follow-up is needed to see whether everolimus with low-dose cyclosporine will result in improved kidney function.

A national program toward improving renal health: advancing organ donation awareness.

BACKGROUND: Despite the national advocacy campaign for kidney transplantation from deceased donors in the Philippines 96% of kidneys transplanted into 721 kidney transplants from 1999 to 2001 came from living donors. A national survey on the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of Filipinos on organ donation in 2001 showed factors that disadvantaged deceased organ donation to be poor understanding of "brain death," religion, and fear of the operation. These concerns were addressed and another survey was conducted in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To compare knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipinos on organ donation between 2001 and 2005, and compare the number of kidney transplants from deceased donors between 2001 until 2008. METHODS: Two surveys in 15 regions of the Philippines were conducted using multistage sampling. Using a structured questionnaire there were 2000 respondents in 2001, and 2140 in 2005. Analysis was performed using chi-square analysis. RESULTS: The majority of respondents knew about kidney donation. Between 2001 and 2005, there was increased awareness that transplants came from both living and deceased donors (37% to 41%) and a decline in those believing transplants came only from deceased donors (14% to 9%). Willingness to become a living (59% to 87%) or a deceased donor (35% to 49%) increased. The increase in transplantation from deceased donors from an average of 10 per year from 1999 to 2001 to 31 per year from 2006 to 2008. CONCLUSION: Increased awareness about kidney donation among Filipinos, improved consent to become an organ donor, and an increase in kidney transplantation from deceased donors occurred from 2001 to 2008.

Efficacy of risk stratification in tailoring immunosuppression regimens in kidney transplant patients at the national kidney and transplant institute.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tailored immunosuppressive regimens prescribed according to a risk stratification scoring system based on the number of HLA mismatches, donor source, panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), and repeat transplant. METHODS: Patients in a retrospective cohort of 329 kidney transplantations performed from October 2004 to December 2005 were assigned scores of 0, 2, 4, or 6 with higher scores for > or =1 HLA mismatches, PRA > 10%, repeat transplant, and unrelated or deceased donor. Added scores of < or =4 comprised the low-risk group who received a Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen without induction, whereas a score > or = 6 denoted high risk including a CNI-based regimen with an interleukin-2 receptor antibody. The efficacy analysis compared the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) at 1 year. RESULTS: Only 227 (69%) of 329 patients had a complete data set and 84 were excluded because they did not follow the prescribed protocol, yielding 113 low- and 30 high-risk patients in the final population. Low-risk patients had a mean PRA of 5.4%, living related donors in 68%, and primary transplants. High-risk patients had a mean PRA of 18.8% (range = 10%-97%), living nonrelated donors in 84%, four deceased donors, and four repeat transplants. The overall 1-year incidence of BPAR was 5.7%. No significant difference (P = .081) was observed in 1-year BPAR between the low- (4.5%) and high-risk (9.8%) groups. Likewise, no significant difference in the 1-year mean serum creatinine was observed according to the CNI. The mean creatinine was 1.12 for cyclosporine and 1.38 for tacrolimus treatment (P = .06) in the low-risk group and 1.08 for cyclosporine and 1.2 for tacrolimus (P = .61) in the high-risk cohort. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in acute rejection rates between the immunologically low- or high-risk patients using tailored immunosuppression, which was effective to minimize its occurrence with good renal function at 1 year.

Everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients: Philippine experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the appropriate dose of everolimus to achieve target trough concentrations in standard-risk Filipino kidney transplant recipients. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed all kidney transplant recipients from December 1, 2006 to June 15, 2007 who were given everolimus (1.5 mg/d) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/d) and prednisone but without induction therapy for their immunosuppressive doses, trough levels, as well as hematologic and blood chemistry profiles. Target everolimus trough concentration was 3-8 ng/mL and C2 level was 1000-1400 ng/mL for the first 3 months. RESULTS: Among 148 patients who underwent transplantation during the study period, 26 comprised the study population but only 15 patients completed the 3-month follow-up and are the subject of this report. Their mean age was 33 years, average PRA 2%, and mean HLA mismatches 3. All were from living donors. At 7 days posttransplantation, all patients achieved or exceeded the target everolimus trough and cyclosporine C2 level. At 1 and 3 months posttransplantation the mean everolimus dose was 1.17 and 0.78 mg/d, respectively, whereas the cyclosporine dose was 195 and 148 mg/d, respectively. Three patients showed elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and all patients had hypercholesterolemia after 1 month, which improved with everolimus dose reduction (half required statins). One patient experienced a Banff Grade IA acute rejection episode at 2 months posttransplantation with a serum creatinine value of 2 mg/dL after steroid pulsing. CONCLUSIONS: Most standard-risk Filipino kidney transplant recipients required a maintenance everolimus dose of 1 mg/d at 1 month. The cyclosporine dose requirement was also lower. A larger sample size is needed to provide a level of significance compared with other populations.

Rituximab in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, depletes B cells and suppresses antibody production. This study sought to describe the efficacy and safety of rituximab among seven highly sensitized kidney transplant patients. METHODOLOGY: A highly sensitized patient was defined as panel-reactive antibody (PRA) >30%, more than three pregnancies, or history of positive tissue crossmatch. Demographics, immunological risk profile, and immunosuppression were collected on all highly sensitized patients transplanted from March to July 2007 and given rituximab. We noted graft function as well as clinical events posttransplantation. RESULTS: The seven patients included in the study showed a mean age of 39 years (range = 17-60) and a mean follow-up of 3 months (range = 1.5-5). Their average PRA was 62% with mean HLA mismatches of three. Five patients (71%) were retransplantations; one had a history of a positive crossmatch, and two had multiple pregnancies. Two had donor-specific antibody, but negative tissue crossmatches. All had living donors. Six patients received a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m2) 1 day prior to transplantation and one received two doses after 19 sessions of plasmapheresis. All were given tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids combined with induction therapy using 30 mg alemtuzumab in 33%; two doses of 20 mg basiliximab in 33%; and seven doses of 1 mg/kg/dose of daclizumab in 14%. Mean shown creatinine levels were 1.1 and 1.2 mg/dL at 1 and 6 months posttransplantation. Two recipients experienced acute humoral rejections within 1 month after transplantation. Both were given steroid pulsing, one of whom was steroid-resistant necessitating alemtuzumab therapy and plasmapheresis. Graft function of both improved with creatinine values of 1.3 mg/dL on discharge. No episodes of infection were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab can be safely administered and may be effective to improve outcomes among highly sensitized kidney transplant patients.

Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy in de novo renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Alemtuzumab is increasingly being used as induction therapy for kidney transplantation, allowing immunosuppression minimization. This study examined the efficacy of alemtuzumab induction followed by low-dose tacrolimus monotherapy in standard risk primary kidney transplant patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort of primary standard risk renal transplant recipients were given alemtuzumab induction and low-dose tacrolimus maintenance immunosuppression (target trough 7 to 10 ng/mL for the first 6 months and 5 to 7 ng/mL thereafter). Serum creatinine values, acute rejection episodes, and graft survival were noted at week 1 as well as months 3, 6, 12, and 18. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 47 patients were at 6 months, 28 at 12 months, and 6 patients at 18 months from transplant. Mean follow-up was 12.53 months (range, 6 to 23). Mean serum creatinine was 1.47 +/- 0.65 mg/dL at 3 months, 1.56 +/- 0.84 at 6 months, 1.45 +/- 0.37 at 12 months, and 1.74 +/- 0.35 at 18 months. The 1-year clinical acute rejection rate was 21% (6/28), occurring at 0 to 3 months in 2 (33%), 4 to 6 months in 1 (17%), and >6 months in 3 patients (50%). Biopsy-proven acute rejection was 14% (4/28). The episodes were classified as borderline in one, Banff 2A in two, and Banff 3 in one patients. One patient had both acute cellular and acute humoral rejection; half responded to steroid pulse therapy. The 1-year patient survival rate was 90%. The 1-year death-censored graft survival rate was 98%. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy is an acceptable option in standard risk patients. BPAR was 14%, but renal function remained satisfactory at 18 months posttransplant.

Use of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) as induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD52-positive B and T lymphocytes. Initial results of its use as an induction agent in adult renal transplantation have been encouraging. We report a case series of four low-risk pediatric renal transplantation patients who received 20 to 40 mg of alemtuzumab as induction followed by a steroid-free regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil. No infusion-related reactions occurred. Patients were aged 9 to 14 years with a mean creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL (range = 0.5-2.3 mg/dL) at a mean follow-up of 10 months (range = 4-16 months). One patient experienced biopsy-proven acute cellular rejections at 4 and 12 months posttransplantation, which were steroid sensitive. Lymphopenia post-alemtuzumab induction started to improve at 3 months posttransplantation. Two patients who received 40 mg of alemtuzumab experienced repeated infections that responded to 7-day courses of antibiotics. There was no cytomegalovirus disease detected. From these preliminary results, alemtuzumab seems to show a promising role to achieve adequate graft function with a steroid-free regimen among low-risk pediatric patients.

Campath-1H (alemtuzumab) as an induction agent for the prevention of graft rejection and preservation of renal function in kidney transplant patients: Philippine 3-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction with Campath-1H with low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) monotherapy using outcome measures of acute rejection episodes (ARE), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), graft and patient survivals, as well as malignancies and infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive either Campath 1H induction with CsA monotherapy (9 patients) or immunosuppression with CsA, azathioprine, and steroids (5 patients). Campath (20 mg IV) was administered within 6 hours after the anastomosis and repeated 24 hours later. Cyclosporine was started 72 hours after the first Campath dose (10 mg/kg on the first day, then 4 mg/kg/d), seeking to achieve target trough CsA levels of 90 to 110 ng/mL. This is a 3-year follow-up of the 9 patients who received Campath-1H induction. RESULTS: Six of 9 (67%) patients developed ARE (borderline ARE to Banff IB) in the Campath group compared with 1 of 5 (20%) in the other group (ARE Banff IIA). They all received methylprednisolone for 3 days with good responses. One of the 6 patients in the Campath group with ARE also displayed CAN and was converted to sirolimus; 2 others had mycophenolate mofetil and steroids added to their immunosuppression after the ARE. Creatinine levels ranged from 1 to 1.7 mg/dL at 24 to 36 months posttransplantation in both groups. Among the Campath group, 1 patient died 6 months posttransplantation with sepsis secondary to infectious diarrhea. Upper respiratory tract infections comprised the majority of infections at 24 to 36 months. No malignancies were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Three years posttransplantation, patients given Campath induction with CsA monotherapy showed a greater incidence of ARE, although renal function remained comparable to CsA-azathioprine-prednisone therapy. AREs were easily reversed with steriods. Infections were minor.

Impact of Banff borderline acute rejection among renal allograft recipients.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of Banff borderline acute rejection (AR) among renal transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the courses of adult kidney transplant recipients with borderline AR on clinically indicated biopsies performed at our center from January 2003 to July 2006. Patients with complete transplant records and serum creatinine values at 6 and 12 months were included in this study. The primary outcome measures were serum creatinine values at 1 to 2 weeks after treatment, and at 6 and 12 months after graft biopsy. RESULTS: Among 428 renal graft biopsies, borderline AR was observed in 100 cases (23%). Patients were maintained on the same immunosuppression. The 86 who had complete data were included in the study. Seventy-eight percent of the patients received treatment with 3 days of methylprednisolone, while 22% were untreated. Mean serum creatinine values in the treated group were 2.9 +/- 1.0, 2.6 +/- 2.5, and 3.0 +/- 2.9 mg/dL at the time of biopsy, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter, respectively. In the untreated group, mean serum creatinine values were 2.2 +/- 1.0, 1.9 +/- 0.8, and 2.3 +/- 1.2 mg/dL during biopsy, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter, respectively. There was no significant difference in the serum creatinine at any of the measured time points between the 2 groups. Twelve patients had repeat renal graft biopsies which showed AR (6%), chronic allograft nephropathy (2.4%), and borderline changes (3.8%). Nine of the patients in the treated group eventually developed graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with borderline AR showed a progressive increase in serum creatinine over time. They should be followed closely; immunosuppression may need to be intensified.