Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 202(3): 515-527, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668821

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In this mixed-methods study, we evaluated the factors that contribute to delayed breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment at a Kenyan hospital. METHODS: Individuals with a diagnosis of BC, either as a referral or index patient, were recruited to participate in this study through convenience sampling. Data were collected on sociodemographics, health history, and cancer history, diagnosis, and treatment of patients at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH). For the quantitative analyses, the relationship between sociodemographic and health history factors with stage at diagnosis, number of visits before diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and time to initial intervention, stratified by time to onset of symptoms, were examined using regression analyses. For the qualitative analysis, in-depth interviews of every fifth patient were completed to assess reasons for delayed diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: The final analytic sample comprised of 378 female BC patients with an average age of 50. These females were generally of lower SES: 49.2% attained no or only primary-level education, 57.4% were unemployed, and the majority (74.6%) had a monthly household income of < 5000 Kenyan shillings (equivalent to ~ $41 USD). The median time from BC symptom onset to presentation at KNH was 13 (IQR = 3-36) weeks, from presentation to diagnosis was 17.5 (IQR = 7-36.5) weeks, and from diagnosis to receipt of the initial intervention was 6 (IQR = 3-13) weeks. Female BC patients who were never/unmarried, less educated, less affluent, users of hormonal contraception, and had ≥ 3 children were more likely to experience diagnosis and treatment delays. Qualitative data showed that financial constraints, lack of patient BC awareness, and healthcare practitioner misdiagnosis and/or strikes delayed patient diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: BC patients experience long healthcare system delays before diagnosis and treatment. Educating communities and providers about BC and expediting referrals may minimize such delays and subsequently BC mortality rates in Kenya.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Child , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Kenya/epidemiology , Hospitals , Delivery of Health Care , Referral and Consultation
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 164(2): 437-444, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28439735

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography add value to traditional mammography in an Asian population with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Data of 244 patients with pure DCIS treated at Severance Hospital between 2013 and 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Data extracted included age, preoperative diagnosis, tumor size on preoperative imaging studies, and final histopathological tumor type and size, including hormone receptor status. The extent of correlation between imaging and histopathological tumor sizes was evaluated using a variety of methods, including Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 52.39 years (SD = 10.31). The mean measurements of the tumor on preoperative ultrasonography, mammography, MRI, and histopathology were 1.80 (SD = 1.23) cm, 2.97 (SD = 1.92) cm, 2.53(SD = 1.84) cm, and 1.88 (SD = 1.36) cm, respectively. The mean differences in tumor size between ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI compared with histopathology were -0.09 (SD = 1.39), 1.09 (SD = 1.89), and 0.65 (SD = 1.78), respectively. The correlation between the sizes was significant with r values for ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI of 0.447 (SE = 0.061), 0.375 (SE = 0.042), and 0.409 (SE = 0.043), respectively. Mammography and MRI estimated tumor size significantly better for patients older than 50 years (p = 0.045 and <0.001, respectively). Mammography also provided good estimation for patients with a body mass index under 25 (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: MRI is better at estimation of histopathological DCIS size compared with mammography. However, ultrasonography had better estimation compared with MRI and mammography, probably owing to the high breast density in this population.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Histocytological Preparation Techniques , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mammography , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tumor Burden , Ultrasonography, Mammary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...