Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Clin Case Rep ; 2(2): 6-8, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32337511

ABSTRACT

During August 2016-July 2017, Arkansas experienced a large mumps (parotitis) outbreak; however, mumps-negative cases of parotitis were also identified in this period. Nineteen of 215 samples (9%) randomly selected for influenza PCR testing were positive for influenza A virus. Practitioners should consider influenza as a cause of nonmumps parotitis.

2.
Environ Toxicol ; 21(3): 193-204, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16646015

ABSTRACT

The genotoxic potential of sediment pore water collected from coastal areas in the Gulf of Mexico has not been reported frequently in the literature. This report summarizes a study of the microbial mutagenicity of 31 pore water samples obtained from sediment affected by non-point source runoff and compares the results with those for more traditional chemical and biological indicators of sediment quality. Genotoxicity was determined pre- and post-enzyme activation using a proprietary short-term microbial assay for pore water centrifuged from sediment collected adjacent to a Florida coastal golf complex and from an urbanized bayou-estuary. Sediment and the associated pore water also were analyzed for acute toxicity to Hyallela azteca, Palaemonetes pugio, or Americamysis bahia and for benthic macroinvertebrate diversity (sediment only). Genotoxicity (direct and enzyme-activated) was detected in 4 of 17 (golf complex) and in 10 of 14 (urbanized bayou) pore water samples. The lowest toxic pore water concentrations were between 1.8% and 44.4% (direct) and between 2.6% and 25% (enzyme-activated). The results of the genotoxic assay paralleled those based on exceedance of proposed sediment quality guidelines, pore water acute toxicity and Shannon-Wiener diversity index values for 81%, 58%, and 65% of the comparisons, respectively.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Seawater/chemistry , Soil Pollutants/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Biodiversity , Florida , Geologic Sediments/analysis , Invertebrates , Mutagenicity Tests , Seawater/analysis , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Toxicity Tests , Water Movements , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
3.
Environ Toxicol ; 17(1): 63-73, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11847975

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this survey were to determine the genotoxic potential of sediment pore waters above and below 10 wastewater outfalls and to compare the results to sediment chemical quality guidelines, acute toxicity, and macrobenthic community composition. The focus of the study was on genotoxicity since its occurrence in environmental media below wastewater discharges in the Gulf of Mexico region has not been reported in the scientific literature. Pore waters from 43 sediment samples were assayed using a microbial mutagenicity assay before and after activation with a rat liver microsome mix (S-9). A combination of either direct or activated responses was observed for 40% of the pore waters. Direct, activated, and both direct and activated responses were observed in 5, 26, and 9% of the total samples, respectively. Mutagenic effects were observed below 7 of the 10 outfall areas and in 4 of 6 control areas associated with 6 outfalls. The lowest pore water concentrations causing an activated mutagenic response were statistically similar above and below the outfalls. Mutagenicity occurred more frequently than acute toxicity to estuarine and freshwater invertebrates and there was no consistent relationship between its occurrence and the exceedance of sediment chemical quality guidelines. In contrast, there was some indication that mutagenic activity paralleled low benthic community diversity.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , DNA Damage , Invertebrates , Mutagenicity Tests , Vibrio/drug effects , Vibrio/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL