Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
Arthroscopy ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844012

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes and complications of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFLR), tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), and trochleoplasty for management of patellar instability. METHODS: A query of Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed in accordance with 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported clinical outcome data after isolated MPFLR, TTO, or trochleoplasty for patellar instability with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Meta-analysis and data aggregation was not performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (5 trochleoplasty, 14 TTO, and 18 MPFLR) consisting of 1,389 patients (114 trochleoplasty, 374 TTO, and 1,001 MPFLR) were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score which ranged from 11-12 in trochleoplasty, 10-18 in TTO, and 8-18 in MPFLR studies. Patient reported outcome measures including Lysholm Score (trochleoplasty: 51.1-71 to 71-95y; TTO: 57-63.3 to 84-98; MPFLR: 37.4-59.1 to 74-92.5), Kujala Score (trochleoplasty: 56-71 to 78-92; TTO: 48.6-68 to 78-92; MPFLR: 53.3-60 to 81.5-92), VAS Pain Scale (trochleoplasty: 52 to 25; TTO: 54-76 to 14-27; MPFLR: 29 to 17, out of 100), and Tegner Score (TTO: 3-4 to 3-4; MPFLR: 2.5-6 to 4.9-5) improved after all surgeries. Failure rates ranged from 0-33.3% after MPFLR, 0-30.8% after TTO, and 5.3-40% after trochleoplasty. Complication rates ranged from 0-14.7% after MPFLR, 1.6-58.3% after TTO, and 8-26.3% after trochleoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated MPFLR, TTO, or trochleoplasty may be effective treatment options for patellar stabilization. While failure rates were highest after isolated trochleoplasty and complication rates were highest after TTO, these procedures are not interchangeable as each addresses a specific pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV studies.

2.
Arthroscopy ; 2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38876446

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs), clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and survivorship following staged hip arthroscopy with labral repair, femoroplasty, and capsular plication followed by periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and hip dysplasia (lateral center edge angle ≤25°). METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried to retrospectively identify patients who underwent staged primary hip arthroscopy and PAO between 1/2018-10/2021 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. PROs collected included, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living/Sports Subscale (HOS-ADL/SS), international Hip Outcome Tool-12 item questionnaire (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain). CSO achievement for minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were determined through cohort specific thresholds. Rates of reoperation, including, revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were evaluated to determine short-term survivorship. RESULTS: Thirty-nine hips met criteria for inclusion, of which 35 hips had minimum 2-year follow up (89.7% compliance). Mean age was 25±9.1 years and 91.7% of patients were female. Respective pre- and postoperative radiographic outcomes were: Alpha angle 59.8±5.9 to 39.7±2.6°, Tönnis angle 14.6±5.6° to -1.0±2.9°, lateral center-edge angle 16.6±5.5° to 36.6±4.6°, and anterior center-edge angle 15.6±9.1° to 36.1±3.8°, with statistically significant differences pre- to postoperatively for all (P<0.001). Patients demonstrated significant improvement in all PROs pre- to postoperatively (P ≤0.004). MCID and PASS achievement rates for any PRO were 93.9% and 78.8%, respectively. There were no revision hip surgeries or conversion to THA at a mean 2.7±1.0-year follow-up. Four patients (11.1%) underwent hardware removal. One patient (2.8%) experienced a postoperative infection treated with incision and drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Staged hip arthroscopy and PAO for the management of hip dysplasia demonstrated improvement in PROs, high CSO achievement rates, and 100% survivorship at minimum 2-year follow-up.

3.
Arthroscopy ; 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604389

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at mid-term follow-up after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without preoperative lower back pain (LBP). METHODS: Patients with self-endorsed preoperative LBP who underwent HA for FAIS with mid-term follow-up were identified and propensity matched 1:1 to patients without back pain by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). PROs collected preoperatively and at postoperative years 1, 2, and 5 included Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain. Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared. Survivorship was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In total, 119 patients with LBP were matched to 119 patients without LBP. Group demographic factors were as follows: age (37.4 ± 11.9 vs 37.6 ± 12.6 years, P = .880), sex (64.4% vs 67.7% female, P = .796), and BMI (25.3 ± 5.1 vs 25.3 ± 5.4, P = .930). Average follow-up duration was 6.0 ± 1.9 years. LBP patients showed similar preoperative PROs, yet lower 1-year scores for all PROs (P ≤ .044). At final follow-up, similar PROs were shown between groups (P ≥ .196). LBP and non-LBP patients had similar MCID achievement for HOS-ADL (59.3% vs 63.1%, P = .640), HOS-SS (73.9% vs 70.8%, P = .710), mHHS (66.7% vs 73.4%, P = .544), iHOT-12 (85.1% vs 79.4%, P = .500), and VAS Pain (75.6% vs 69.9%, P = .490). Groups also had similar PASS achievement for HOS-ADL (63.5% vs 61.3%, P = .777), HOS-SS (57.0% vs 62.5%, P = .461), mHHS (81.9% vs 79.1%, P = .692), iHOT-12 (54.6% vs 61.2%, P = .570), and VAS Pain (51.0% vs 55.4%, P = .570). Additionally, achievement of MCID ≥ 1 PRO (P ≥ .490) and PASS ≥ 1 PRO (P ≥ .370) was similar across groups. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty occurred in 3.4% of hips with LBP and 0.8% of hips without LBP (P = .370). Back pain patients demonstrated inferior time-dependent survivorship compared with patients without back pain on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with LBP achieve comparable PROs and clinically significant outcomes to patients without back pain at mid-term, despite lower 1-year PRO scores. LBP patients show inferior reoperation-free time-dependent survivorship compared with those without LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

4.
Am J Sports Med ; : 3635465231213873, 2024 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been proposed to augment healing at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) by creating several bone marrow vents in the footprint of the rotator cuff, allowing mesenchymal stem cells, platelets, and growth factors to cover the area as a "crimson duvet." PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes after BMS and a control for those undergoing ARCR. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RCTs comparing BMS and a control for ARCR were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, and a P value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs with 576 patients were included. Overall, 18.8% of patients treated with BMS and 21.0% of patients treated with a control had a retear (I2 = 43%; P = .61). With BMS, the mean Constant score was 88.2, and with the control, the mean Constant score was 86.7 (P = .12). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (94.3 vs 93.2, respectively; P = .31) or visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 0.9, respectively; P = .89). CONCLUSION: The level 1 evidence in the literature did not support BMS as a modality to improve retear rates or clinical outcomes after ARCR.

7.
Arthroscopy ; 40(3): 726-731.e6, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567487

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the quality and readability of information regarding shoulder stabilization surgery available using an online AI software (ChatGPT), using standardized scoring systems, as well as to report on the given answers by the AI. METHODS: An open AI model (ChatGPT) was used to answer 23 commonly asked questions from patients on shoulder stabilization surgery. These answers were evaluated for medical accuracy, quality, and readability using The JAMA Benchmark criteria, DISCERN score, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) & Grade Level (FKGL). RESULTS: The JAMA Benchmark criteria score was 0, which is the lowest score, indicating no reliable resources cited. The DISCERN score was 60, which is considered a good score. The areas that open AI model did not achieve full marks were also related to the lack of available source material used to compile the answers, and finally some shortcomings with information not fully supported by the literature. The FRES was 26.2, and the FKGL was considered to be that of a college graduate. CONCLUSIONS: There was generally high quality in the answers given on questions relating to shoulder stabilization surgery, but there was a high reading level required to comprehend the information presented. However, it is unclear where the answers came from with no source material cited. It is important to note that the ChatGPT software repeatedly references the need to discuss these questions with an orthopaedic surgeon and the importance of shared discussion making, as well as compliance with surgeon treatment recommendations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As shoulder instability is an injury that predominantly affects younger individuals who may use the Internet for information, this study shows what information patients may be getting online.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Shoulder/surgery , Comprehension , Language
8.
Arthroscopy ; 40(2): 515-522, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37146663

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To systematically review the current evidence in the literature to compare return to play following arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comparative studies reporting return to play following arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure were included. Return to play was compared, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager, Version 5.3. RESULTS: Nine studies with 1,242 patients (mean age: 15-30 years) were included. The rate of return to play was 61% to 94.1% among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and 72% to 96.8% in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure. Two studies (Bessiere et al. and Zimmerman et al.) found a significant difference in favor of the Latarjet procedure (P < .05 for both, I2 = 37%). The rate of return to play at preinjury level was 9% to 83.8% among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and 19.4% to 80.6% in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure, with no study finding a significant difference (P > .05 for all, I2 = 0%). The mean time of return to play was 5.4 to 7.3 months among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and 5.5 to 6.2 months in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure, with no study finding a significant difference (P > .05 for all, I2 = 39%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the majority of studies showed no significant difference in rates of return to play or timing following arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedure. Furthermore, no study has found a significant difference in rate of return to play at pre-injury level, or rate of return to play among collision athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level I-III studies.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Shoulder Dislocation , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Return to Sport , Joint Instability/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Recurrence , Arthroscopy/methods
9.
Arthroscopy ; 40(3): 941-946, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37816398

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with and without acellular collagen matrix patch (ACMP) augmentation. METHODS: A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RCTs comparing ACMP augmentation and a control for ARCR were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using Revman, and a P value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Five RCTs with 307 patients were included. Overall, 11% of patients treated with ACMP augmentation and 34% of patients in the control group had a re-tear (P = .0006). The mean Constant score was 90.1 with ACMP augmentation, and 87.3 in controls (P = .02). Additionally, there was a significant higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score with ACMP augmentation (87.7 vs 82.1, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The RCTs in the literature support the use of ACMP augment as a modality to reduce re-tear rates and improve outcomes after ARCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Meta-Analysis of Level II Studies meta-analysis of Level II studies.


Subject(s)
Aminopyridines , Lacerations , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Humans , Collagen/therapeutic use , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Rupture , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
J ISAKOS ; 9(1): 79-83, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797939

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to systematically review the comparative studies in the literature to ascertain if biceps tenodesis or superior-labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repair results in superior clinical outcomes in the treatment of type II SLAP tears in patients under 40. METHODS: A systematic search of articles in Pubmed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort studies comparing biceps tenodesis to repair in type II SLAP tears in patients under 40 were included. Clinical outcomes were extracted including return to play, reoperations, ASES, and VAS for pain. All statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Biceps tenodesis resulted in comparable rates of return to play compared to SLAP repair (78.5% vs 67.7%, p â€‹= â€‹0.33), and there was no significant difference in return to play in overhead athletes (83.6% vs 74%, p â€‹= â€‹0.82). There was no significant difference in ASES score (87.2 vs 86.2, p â€‹= â€‹0.27) or VAS score for pain (1.8 vs 2.1, p â€‹= â€‹0.48). There was no significant difference in re-operation rates (2.9% vs 10.8%, p â€‹= â€‹0.22). CONCLUSION: This study found that biceps tenodesis has no significant difference in rates of return to play in athletes, as well as in functional outcome scores and rates of revision surgery in younger patients compared to SLAP repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Systematic review of Level III studies.


Subject(s)
Shoulder Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Tenodesis , Humans , Tenodesis/methods , Shoulder Injuries/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Pain
11.
J ISAKOS ; 9(2): 143-147, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104945

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to utilize Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep scores to determine the prevalence of sleep dysfunction and its association with other PROMIS scores in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCT). METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified using the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes for RCT pathology, and PROMIS outcomes were assessed at multiple visits between November 2017 and February 2020. Generalized linear mixed effects models were fitted with PROMIS sleep score as the predictor variable and other PROMIS scores as the response variable. Additionally, models were fit using a clinically significant dichotomization of PROMIS sleep scores to assess differences in average PROMIS scores. RESULTS: The study cohort included 481 patients, 201 (41.8 â€‹%) of whom had disrupted sleep at first visit. A higher percentage of those with disrupted sleep at first visit were female, nonwhite, and not married compared to those with normal sleep. PROMIS scores at first visit differed by sleep category. Higher PROMIS sleep scores were associated with higher anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain intensity, and pain interference scores and lower physical function, social participation, and upper extremity scores. Relationships were similar when dichotomous PROMIS sleep scores were considered. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence of sleep dysfunction in patients with RCT. Sleep disturbance is associated with increased anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference and decreased physical function, social participation, and upper extremity function in patients with RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Retrospective Cohort Study.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Female , Humans , Male , Rotator Cuff Injuries/epidemiology , Upper Extremity , Pain , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Information Systems
12.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil ; 5(5): 100786, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37746320

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare bone marrow stimulation using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis of an abrasion arthroplasty technique, drilling k-wire technique, traditional microfacture awl, or a microdrill instrument for subchondral bone defects. Methods: Eleven cadaveric distal femoral specimens were obtained and divided into 3 common areas of osteochondral defect: trochlea and weightbearing portions of the medial and lateral femoral condyles. Each area of interest was then denuded of cartilage using a PoweRasp and divided into quadrants. Each quadrant was assigned either a 1.6 mm Kirschner wire (k-wire), 1.25 mm microfracture awl, 1.5 mm fluted microdrill, PowerPick, or a curette (abrasion arthroplasty) to create 4 channels into the subchondral bone sing the same instrument. Subchondral bone and adjacent tissue areas were then evaluated using micro-CT to analyze adjacent bone destruction and extension into the bone marrow. Results: Overall, there was a significantly decreased area of bone destruction or compression using the microdrill (0.030 mm) as compared to the microfracture awl (0.072 mm) and k-wire (0.062 mm) (P < .05). Within the trochlea and the medial femoral condyle, there was significantly decreased bony compression with the microdrill as compared to the awl and k-wire (P < .05); however, when stratified, this was not significant among the lateral femoral condylar samples (P = .08). Conclusion: Bone marrow stimulation causes bony compression that may negatively impact subchondral bone and trabecular alignment. It is important to understand which tools used for bone marrow stimulation cause the least amount of damage to the subchondral bone. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates the decreased subchondral bony defects seen with the microdrill versus the traditional microfracture awl indicating that when performing bone marrow stimulation, the microdrill may be a less harmful tool to the subchondral bone.

13.
Arthroscopy ; 39(9): 2009-2011, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543385

ABSTRACT

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous blood product containing a high concentration of platelets, growth factors, and cytokines, which basic science studies have shown may improve tendinopathy. However, there is controversy over its clinical efficacy with randomized controlled trials and subsequent meta-analysis finding mixed results when treating shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy. The effect of leukocyte concentration on PRP has been shown to be paramount, with different concentrations being favored for different pathologies. In those with tendinopathy, it is unclear whether leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP is superior. Recent research shows that PRP injections produced a significant improvement in most patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. However, improvement in symptoms and functional outcomes is worse in patients who have a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear compared with isolated tendinopathy without a partial tear. PRP may be more advantageous than corticosteroids. Both function as anti-inflammatories, but PRP may be potentially anabolic, whereas as corticosteroids have a catabolic effect on tendons, which may reduce repairability if patients proceed with surgery. Additionally, there are higher infection rates if patients ultimately go on to surgery within 3 months after corticosteroid injections. Ultimately, we must refine the indications for best use for PRP shoulder injections and determine the 5 R's: right patient, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time. Finally, we must remember that patients can first try conservative management, including physical therapy.


Subject(s)
Platelet-Rich Plasma , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Tendinopathy , Humans , Rotator Cuff , Rotator Cuff Injuries/therapy , Rotator Cuff Injuries/metabolism , Tendinopathy/therapy , Platelet-Rich Plasma/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Injections, Intra-Articular
14.
J ISAKOS ; 8(5): 338-344, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37414217

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to report and compare postoperative range of motion (ROM), patient-reported outcomes, and failure rates following superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and to compare outcomes between arthroscopic and mini-open techniques. METHODS: All SCR procedures utilising dermal allograft with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up at multiple institutions between November 2015 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patient demographics, imaging measurements, surgical technique (arthroscopic versus mini-open), and outcomes including pain scores, conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, subsequent surgery, and postoperative ROM were recorded. Outcomes for arthroscopic versus mini-open approaches were compared via t-test, Fisher's exact test, or chi square test, as appropriate, with differences of p â€‹< â€‹0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: 180 total patients were included, including 98 who underwent arthroscopic SCR and 82 who underwent mini-open SCR. Final follow-up was at a mean of 32 months (standard deviation = 11 months). SCR improved pain (visual analog scale â€‹= â€‹4.4 pre-operatively vs. 1.4 post-operatively, p â€‹< â€‹0.0001) and ROMin active forward flexion (136° pre-operatively vs. 150° post-operatively, p â€‹= â€‹0.0012). No difference in post-operative pain visual analog scores was found between mini-open and arthroscopic cohorts (1.3 vs. 1.6, p â€‹= â€‹0.3432) at a mean of 14 months post-operatively. At a mean of 32 months post-operatively, there were no differences in ASES, QuickDASH, SST, WORC, or SANE scores between open and arthroscopic cohorts. There was no difference in rates of failure between mini-open and arthroscopic cohorts (15.9% vs. 17.3%, p â€‹= â€‹0.789). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that SCR improves pain and ROM in the short term. Mini-open SCR appears to provide similar improvements in pain and ROM compared with arthroscopic SCR, as well as patient-reported outcomes at 3 years. No difference in failure rates was detected between the 2 procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 evidence.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology
15.
Arthroscopy ; 39(5): 1296-1298, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019539

ABSTRACT

Effective analgesia is essential after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to control pain while minimizing opioid consumption and allowing early rehabilitation. Orthopaedic surgeons write the third-largest number of opioid prescriptions, which are responsible for 1/10th of all opioid prescriptions, and one-third of patients with ACL injury use opioids preoperatively, a risk factor for postoperative abuse. Pain management after ACL reconstruction using variety of analgesic regimens including various permutations of nerve blocks, nerve block adjuncts, intra-articular injections, intravenous and oral medications, cryotherapy, compression stockings, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation units, based on multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists, can minimize opioid consumption. A recent meta-analysis shows that combined femoral-sciatic nerve block may be a top-ranked analgesic technique. Femoral and adductor canal nerve blocks are also effective alternatives and most common. Femoral and femoral sciatic nerve blocks may risk quadriceps strength deficits, whereas an advantage of adductor canal nerve is that the saphenous nerve is purely sensory. We recommend longer-acting nerve blockade (72 hours) using continuous anesthetic delivery via a pump/catheter with ropivacaine or the use of a slow-release preparation such as bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Ropivacaine , Analgesics , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femoral Nerve , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use
16.
Foot Ankle Spec ; 16(3): 214-220, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35100911

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has become increasingly utilized over the past 20 years to treat osteoarthritis of the ankle. The efficacy and safety of this procedure has been previously reported, but relatively few studies have documented the risk of postoperative complications associated with TAA over the past 10 years. Thus, the aim of this study is to provide a current report on the safety of TAA, particularly in association with a number of preoperative risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent TAA between 2012 and 2018 was performed. A total of 1333 patients were included in this analysis. Penalized logistic regression to consider small numbers of the postoperative complications was used to identify factors associated with incidence of the complications. RESULTS: The rate of readmission and superficial wound infection were found to be 1.4% and 0.6%, respectively. Risk factors associated with a prolonged hospital stay were black race, Hispanic race, and smoking. Diabetes was associated with a significantly increased risk of readmission. Age, sex, body mass index, and steroid use were not associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this study, the rate of surgical site infection and readmission in TAA was found to be relatively low, compared to published data on total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Both race and smoking increase the risk of prolonged hospital stay, while diabetes increases the risk of readmission. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle , Diabetes Mellitus , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ankle/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/methods , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Risk Factors , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Patient Readmission
17.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(6): 2405-2409, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioid narcotics than any other surgical specialty. Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) often occur in the high-risk elderly population. The opioid epidemic has led to public policy aimed at reductions in opioid prescription. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that new legislation has had on opioid prescription patterns in patients who sustained proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who sustained PHF at a single academic institution from 1/1/2015-12/31/2019 was performed. A total of 762 proximal humerus fractures were identified and final analysis included 383 patients. Collected data included basic demographics and opioid prescriptions obtained through review of the electronic medical record. The North Carolina Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention act legislation that went into effect on July 1, 2017. RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of pre- or postoperative opioid prescriptions provided with the new legislation. Our data showed a significant reduction in MeQs prescribed preoperatively pre-STOP act (188.1 MeQs) and post-STOP act (99.4 MeQs). There was also a significant difference in the amount of postoperative narcotics prescribed in the pre-STOP (972.6 MeQs) and post-STOP act (508.6 MeQs) groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With the enactment of the STOP act in North Carolina, we have seen a significant reduction in the amount of narcotic prescribed after sustaining a proximal humerus fracture preoperatively and postoperatively. This data demonstrates the impact that implementation of state-wide regulatory changes in opioid prescribing policy has had for a common orthopedic condition.


Subject(s)
Humeral Fractures , Opioid-Related Disorders , Shoulder Fractures , Humans , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology
18.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 31(2): 104-108, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35820096

ABSTRACT

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common in elderly and osteoporotic patients, and these fractures are often described using the Neer classification. As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for PHF becomes more common, it is helpful to identify the utility of Neer classification in predicting postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing RSA. The medical records of patients undergoing primary RSA for PHF at a single academic institution from 2013-2019 were identified using medical billing codes. A multivariable logistic regression analysis identified independent factors associated with all cause 90-day readmissions, reoperation, and length of stay (LOS) greater than three days. Fifty-five patients (average age of 72.3 ± 8.6 years) were included. No statistically significant differences among two-, three-, and four-part fractures with regard to LOS, discharge location, 90-day readmission, revision surgery, postoperative dislocation, or deep infection were detected. These findings suggest that Neer classification for PHF is not predictive of short-term complications after RSA. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):104-108, 2022).


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Shoulder Fractures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Shoulder Fractures/surgery
19.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 28(8): 1266-1271, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667952

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been theorized that tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction (TPTD) is a degenerative process unrelated to inflammation. The purpose of this study was to determine if inflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), and glutamate were elevated in diseased tibialis posterior tendons (TPTs). METHODS: Matched diseased TPT, TPT insertion, and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) samples were collected from 21 patients. The samples were individually incubated in media, which was analyzed for inflammatory cytokines, MMPs, and glutamate. Histology and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Diseased TPT and TPT insertion were significantly elevated compared to transferred FDL in eight inflammatory markers (p < 0.005). Only the diseased TPT was significantly elevated compared to the transferred FDL tendons for glutamate (p < 0.01). Histologic grading correlated with inflammatory cytokine levels. CONCLUSION: Diseased TPT and TPT insertion demonstrated significantly elevated levels of inflammatory markers compared to the transferred tendons used as controls, suggesting a role for inflammation in the disease process. The amount of inflammation correlated with increased tendon degradation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Glutamic Acid , Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction , Humans , Tendons/surgery , Tendon Transfer , Foot/surgery
20.
Arthroscopy ; 38(7): 2350-2358, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35605840

ABSTRACT

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electromagnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the foot and ankle (including acute traumatic injuries and fractures, tumor, infection, osteochondral lesions, arthritis, and tendinopathy) and procedures, including osteotomy or fusion. Promising and established treatment modalities include 1) bone-based therapies (such as cancellous or cortical autograft from the iliac crest, proximal tibia, and/or calcaneus, fresh-frozen or freeze-dried cortical or cancellous allograft, including demineralized bone matrix putty or powder combined with growth factors, and synthetic bone graft substitutes, such as calcium sulfate, calcium phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, bioactive glasses (often in combination with bone marrow aspirate), and polymers; proteins such as bone morphogenic proteins; and platelet-derived growth factors; 2) cartilage-based therapies such as debridement, bone marrow stimulation (such as microfracture or drilling), scaffold-based techniques (such as autologous chondrocyte implantation [ACI] and matrix-induced ACI, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, matrix-associated stem cell transplantation, particulated juvenile cartilage allograft transplantation, and minced local cartilage cells mixed with fibrin and platelet rich plasma [PRP]); and 3) blood, cell-based, and injectable therapies such as PRP, platelet-poor plasma biomatrix loaded with mesenchymal stromal cells, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, hyaluronic acid, and stem or stromal cell therapy, including mesenchymal stem cell allografts, and adipose tissue-derived stem cells, and micronized adipose tissue injections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Orthopedics , Ankle , Cartilage/transplantation , Chondrogenesis , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...