Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 12(7): e9476, 2020 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32874805

ABSTRACT

A 77-year-old African American female was referred to oncology for evaluation of an adrenal fossa mass detected on computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis (CT-scan A/P) that was ordered as a work-up for painless hematuria. Further evaluation by positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed hypermetabolic masses in the left suprarenal and right iliac region. The biopsy of the right iliac mass was consistent with IgG4-related disease (IgG4RD). It was supported by an elevated serum IgG4 level. She was treated with prednisone with a good response.

2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(1)2019 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674496

ABSTRACT

This is a case of a 67-year-old woman, known to have multiple medical problems, mainly papillary thyroid cancer status post-total thyroidectomy and cervical neck dissection in addition to radioactive iodine currently in remission for 1 year, who presented to the hospital with severe weakness and fatigue. The initial workup showed significant hypercalcaemia and suppressed Parathyroid hormone (PTH). The patient was treated with hydration and pamidronate and her hypercalcaemia and symptoms improved. The differential was wide, however, a CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis did show multiple liver and splenic nodular lesions; therefore, malignancy was the highest possible diagnosis. Biopsy of the splenic lesion confirmed the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with primary isolated nodular hepatosplenic sarcoidosis mimicking malignancy and causing significant symptomatic hypercalcaemia.


Subject(s)
Hypercalcemia/etiology , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Sarcoidosis/complications , Aftercare , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Hypercalcemia/diagnosis , Hypercalcemia/drug therapy , Liver Diseases/complications , Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Liver Diseases/pathology , Pamidronate/administration & dosage , Pamidronate/therapeutic use , Sarcoidosis/diagnostic imaging , Sarcoidosis/pathology , Sarcoidosis/therapy , Splenic Diseases/complications , Splenic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Splenic Diseases/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32002154

ABSTRACT

Background: In the USA cancer is the second leading cause of mortality, as such, primary prevention of cancer is a major public health concern. Vitamin D supplementation has been studied as a primary prevention method for multiple diseases including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus and cancer. The role of Vitamin D as primary prevention of cancer is still controversial. With fast emergence of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in that regards, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Vitamin D supplementation as primary prophylaxis for cancer. Methods: A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted for all RCTs where comparison of Vitamin D supplementation versus placebo for the prevention of any type of disease with at least 3 years of Vitamin D supplementation was used and where cancer incidence or mortality was reported. The primary outcome was cancer-related mortality and cancer incidence. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model at the longest follow-up. Results: We included 10 RCTs with 79,055 total patients, mean age of 68.07 years, a female percentage of 78.02% and a minimum follow-up of 4 years and more. Vitamin D was associated with significant reduction of cancer-related mortality compared with placebo (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79-0.96; P = 0.05: I2 = 0%). Compared with placebo, Vitamin D was not associated with significant reduction of cancer incidence (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.86-1.07; P = 0.46; I2 = 31%). Conclusion: With inclusion of studies, which did not primarily examine vitamin D for the purpose of preventing cancer or reducing cancer mortality our meta-analysis highlights that the use of vitamin D supplementation for primary prevention of cancer is encouraged as it does possibly decrease cancer-related mortality once cancer is diagnosed; however, it has no role or effect on cancer incidence.

4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29950369

ABSTRACT

This is the case of a 56-year-old white woman with a medical history significant for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, migraine, hypertension, tobacco abuse and hypercholesterolaemia. Her surgical history is significant for total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for diffuse endometriosis. The patient presented with a vaginal lesion. The biopsy was positive for primary vaginal small cell carcinoma and human papilloma virus (HPV). Initial staging positron emission tomography (PET) scan confirmed stage 1 disease. The patient was started on chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for four cycles, followed by concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin/taxol and radiation therapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Vaginal Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/virology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Vagina/virology , Vaginal Neoplasms/virology
6.
Breast J ; 5(2): 149-150, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11348276
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...