Can Publicly Available Artificial Intelligence Successfully Identify Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Common Procedures in Neurosurgery?

OBJECTIVE: Coding for neurosurgical procedures is a complex process that is dynamically changing year to year, through the annual introduction and removal of codes and modifiers. The authors hoped to elucidate if publicly available artificial intelligence (AI) could offer solutions for neurosurgeons with regard to coding. METHODS: Multiple publicly available AI platforms were asked to provide Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and Revenue Value Units (RVU) values for common neurosurgical procedures of the brain and spine with a given indication for the procedure. The responses of platforms were recorded and compared to the currently valid CPT codes used for the procedure and the amount of RVUs that would be gained. RESULTS: Six platforms and Google were asked for the appropriate CPT codes for 10 endovascular, spinal, and cranial procedures each. The highest performing platforms were as follows: Perplexity.AI identified 70% of endovascular, BingAI identified 55% of spinal, and ChatGPT 4.0 with Bing identified 75% of cranial CPT codes. With regard to RVUs, the top performer gained 78% of endovascular, 42% of spinal, and 70% of cranial possible RVUs. With regard to accuracy, AI platforms on average outperformed Google (45% vs. 25%, P = 0.04236). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of publicly available AIs to successfully code for neurosurgical procedures holds great promise in the future. Future development of AI should focus on improving accuracy with regard to CPT codes and providing supporting documentation for its decisions. Improvement on the existing capabilities of AI platforms can allow for increased operational efficiency and cost savings for practices.

Appearance and modeling of bubble artifacts in intracranial magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRg-LITT) temperature images.

PURPOSE: To understand if unexplained signal artifacts in MRg-LITT proton resonance frequency- (PRF-) shift thermometry images are caused by air bubbles or hemorrhages, and to characterize their effects on temperature measurements. METHODS: Retrospective image data from an IRB-approved clinical trial of intracranial MRg-LITT were inspected for asymmetric distortions observed in phase data during ablations, which have been previously reported as likely hemorrhages. A total of eight patient cases were selected: seven with artifact occurrence and one without. Mathematical image models for air bubbles or hemorrhages were implemented to estimate the size of the air bubble or hemorrhage needed to explain the clinically observed phase artifacts. Correlations and Bland-Altman analyses were used to determine if an air bubble model or a hemorrhage model was better correlated to the clinical data. The model was used to inject bubbles into clean PRF phase data without artifacts to examine how temperature profile distortions change with slice orientation. The simulated air-bubble injected data were compared to clinical data containing artifacts to examine the bubbles' effects on temperature and thermal damage estimates. RESULTS: The model demonstrated that air bubbles up to approximately 1 cm in diameter could explain the clinically observed phase artifacts. The bubble model predicts that a hemorrhage would have to be 2.2 times as large as an air bubble in order to explain the same extent of phase distortion observed in clinical data. Air bubbles had 16% percent higher correlations to the clinical PRF phase data than hemorrhages, even after rescaling the hemorrhage phases to better match the data. The air bubble model also explains how the phase artifacts lead to both large positive and large negative temperature errors, up to ±100 °C, which could cascade to damage estimate errors of several millimeters. CONCLUSION: Results showed that the artifacts are likely caused by air bubbles rather than hemorrhages, which may be introduced before heating or appear during heating. Manufacturers and users of devices that rely upon PRF-shift thermometry should be aware these phase distortions from bubble artifacts can result in large temperature errors.

The Evolution of Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Gliomas.

Laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) has evolved over the past two decades to treat a number of intracranial pathologies. Although it initially emerged as a salvage treatment of surgically inoperable tumors or recurrent lesions that had exhausted more conventional treatments, it is now being used as a primary, first-line treatment in certain instances with outcomes comparable to traditional surgical resection. The authors discuss the evolution of LITT in the treatment of gliomas and future directions, which may further enhance the efficacy of this procedure.

Frameless Robotic-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation With the Mazor Renaissance System.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted stereotactic systems for deep brain stimulation (DBS) have recently gained popularity because of their abilities to automate arduous human error-prone steps for lead implantation. Recent DBS literature focuses on frame-based robotic platforms, but little has been reported on frameless robotic approaches, specifically the Food and Drug Administration-approved Mazor Renaissance Guidance System (Mazor Robotics Ltd). OBJECTIVE: To present an initial case series for patients undergoing awake DBS with the Mazor Renaissance Guidance System and evaluate operative variables and stereotactic accuracy. METHODS: Retrospective data collection at a single institution was conducted for an initial 35 consecutive patients. Patient demographics and operative variables, including case times, microelectrode recording passes, and postoperative complications, were obtained by chart review. Implant accuracy was evaluated through measuring radial and vector (x, y) errors using the Mazor software. Pneumocephalus volumes were calculated using immediate postoperative T1-weighted MRI scans. RESULTS: Total operating room (245 ± 5.5 min) and procedural (179 ± 4.7) times were comparable with previous awake DBS literature. The radial error for center tract implants was 1.3 ± 0.1 mm, with smaller error in the first (1.1 ± 0.2) vs second (1.7 ± 0.3) implants of bilateral DBS (P = .048). Vector error analysis demonstrated larger shifts posteriorly for first implants and medially for second implants. Pneumocephalus volumes (12.4 ± 2.2 cm3) were not associated with increased microelectrode recording passes, radial error, or complications. CONCLUSION: Frameless robotic-assisted DBS is a safe and efficient new technology that has been easily adopted into the workflow at our institution.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Brainstem Pathologies.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive and effective treatment option that can potentially treat deep-seated pathologies in cases without safe open surgical corridors. In the present report, we have described our experience using MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review and analysis were conducted for all patients who had undergone MRgLITT for pathologies within or closely surrounding the brainstem between 2011 and 2020. The patients had undergone stereotactic laser placement in the operating suite and were transported to the magnetic resonance imaging suite for laser ablation with real-time monitoring. The demographics, operative parameters, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients had undergone MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies. The average age of the patients was 47.6 years (range, 4-75 years). The pathologies included both primary and metastatic intracranial tumors. The average preablation volume of the targets was 2.4 ± 0.50 cm3. The average ablation time was 324.3 ± 60.7 seconds, and the average postablation volume was 2.92 ± 0.53 cm3. One perioperative mortality was directly related to the procedure and 7 patients developed postoperative deficits. Two patients had experienced a recurrence after MRgLITT and opted to undergo additional alternative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The brainstem represents formidable territory even for minimally invasive procedures. The overall morbidity and mortality has remained high, and the probability of achieving a meaningful outcome must be carefully assessed.

Controlling Signal Artifact With Software Threshold Imaging for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) uses intraoperative temperature mapping and thermal damage estimates to guide ablations of intracranial targets. In select cases, signal artifact presents at the target site and impairs intraprocedural decision-making by obscuring the visualization of both temperature imaging and the thermal damage estimate calculation. To date, the etiology and impact of signal artifact are unknown. However, user-selected MRgLITT software settings may play a role in generating artifact. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the thresholding feature in MRgLITT software on signal artifact generation during intracranial ablations. METHODS: Ablations were performed with the Visualase MRI-guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). For each LITT procedure, raw thermal data were extracted at a reference threshold of 40 and reprocessed at 5 additional threshold values ranging from 35 to 60. Artifact growth rates relative to threshold values were derived using simple linear regressions and then assessed within the context of laser power and duration using Pearson correlations. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included, with 28 artifact-containing and 5 artifact-free cases. For artifact-containing cases, a 13% increase in artifact area occurred for every 1-point increase in threshold (R2 > 0.99). Artifact growth rates were not correlated with laser power (r = 0.15, P = .44) or duration (r = 0.0049, P = .98). One of the 5 artifact-free cases developed artifact at a threshold of 60. CONCLUSION: Artifact generation is likely multifactorial involving tissue properties and software settings. Operators can minimize software-introduced artifact by reducing threshold values.

Current applications and safety profile of laser interstitial thermal therapy in the pediatric population: a systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) provides a minimally invasive alternative to open brain surgery, making it a powerful neurosurgical tool especially in pediatric patients. This systematic review aimed to highlight the indications and complications of LITT in the pediatric population. METHODS: In line with the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic review to summarize the current applications and safety profiles of LITT in pediatrics. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that reported the outcomes of LITT in patients < 21 years of age. Retrospective studies, case series, and case reports were included. Two authors independently screened the articles by title and abstract followed by full text. Relevant variables were extracted from studies that met final eligibility, and results were pooled using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The selection process captured 303 pediatric LITT procedures across 35 studies. Males comprised approximately 60% of the aggregate sample, with a mean age of 10.5 years (range 0.5-21 years). The LITT technologies used included Visualase (89%), NeuroBlate (9%), and Multilase 2100 (2%). The most common indication was treatment of seizures (86%), followed by brain tumors (16%). The mean follow-up duration was 15.6 months (range 1.3-48 months). The overall complication rate was 15.8%, which comprised transient neurological deficits, cognitive and electrolyte disturbances, hemorrhage, edema, and hydrocephalus. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: As of now, LITT's most common applications in pediatrics are focused on treating medically refractory epilepsy and brain tumors that can be difficult to resect. The safety of LITT can provide an attractive alternative to open brain surgery in the pediatric population.

Is It Possible to Save the Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware when Presenting with Wound Dehiscence or Hardware Infection?

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware complications have been traditionally managed by removal of the entire system. Explantation of the system results in prolonged interruption to the patient's care and potential challenges when considering reimplantation of the cranial leads. The purpose of this study was to understand whether complete explantation can be avoided for patients initially presenting with wound dehiscence and/or infection of hardware. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study that included 30 cases of wound dehiscence or infection involving the DBS system. Patients underwent reoperation without explantation of the DBS system, with partial explanation, or with complete explantation as initial management of the complication. RESULTS: A total of 17/30 cases were managed with hardware-sparing wound revisions. The majority presented with wound dehiscence (94%), with the scalp (n = 9) as the most common location. This was successful in 76.5% of patients (n = 13). Over 11/30 patients were managed with partial explantation. The complication was located at the generator (91%) or at the scalp (9%). Partial explantation was successful in 64% of patients (n = 7). In cases that underwent a lead-sparing approach, 33% of patients ultimately required removal of the intracranial lead, and 2/30 cases of hardware infection were managed initially with total explantation. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Wound dehiscence can be successfully managed without complete removal of the DBS system in most cases. In cases of infection, removing the involved component(s) and sparing the intracranial leads may be considered. Wound revision without removal of the entire DBS system is safe and can improve quality of life by preventing or shortening the withdrawal of DBS treatment.

Mathematical Modeling of Thermal Damage Estimate Volumes in MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that produces real-time thermal damage estimates (TDEs) of ablation. Currently, MRgLITT software provides limited quantitative parameters for intraoperative monitoring, but orthogonal TDE-MRI slices can be utilized to mathematically estimate ablation volume. The objective of this study was to model TDE volumes and validate using post-24 hours MRI ablative volumes. METHODS: Ablations were performed with the Visualase Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Using ellipsoidal parameters determined for dual-TDEs from orthogonal MRI planes, TDE volumes were calculated by two definite integral methods (A and B) implemented in Matlab (MathWorks). Post-24 hours MRI ablative volumes were measured in OsiriX (Pixmeo) by two-blinded raters and compared to TDE volumes via paired t-test and Pearson's correlations. RESULTS: Twenty-two ablations for 20 patients with various intracranial pathologies were included. Average TDE volume calculated with method A was 3.44 ± 1.96 cm3 and with method B was 4.83 ± 1.53 cm3 . Method A TDE volumes were significantly different than post-24 hours volumes (P < .001). Method B TDE volumes were not significantly different than post-24 hours volumes (P = .39) and strongly correlated with each other (r = .85, R2 = .72, P < .0001). A total of eight of 22 (36%) method A versus 17 of 22 (77%) method B TDE volumes were within 25% of the post-24 hours ablative volume. CONCLUSION: We present a viable mathematical method integrating dual-plane TDEs to calculate volumes. Future algorithmic iterations will incorporate additional calculated variables that improve ablative volume estimations.

Performance assessment of two motion management systems for frameless stereotactic radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires dedicated systems to monitor patient motion in order to avoid inaccurate radiation delivery due to involuntary shifts. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy and sensitivity of two distinct motion monitoring systems used for frameless SRS. METHODS: A surface image-guided system known as optical surface monitoring system (OSMS), and a fiducial marker-based system known as high definition motion management (HDMM) as part of the latest Gamma Knife Icon® were compared. A 3D printer-based cranial motion phantom was developed to evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of these two systems in terms of: (1) the capability to recognize predefined shifts up to 3 cm, and (2) the capability to recognize predefined speeds up to 3 cm/s. The performance of OSMS, in terms of different reference surfaces, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Translational motion could be accurately detected by both systems, with an accuracy of 0.3 mm for displacement up to 1 cm, and 0.5 mm for larger displacements. The reference surface selection had an impact on OSMS performance, with flat surface resulting in less accuracy. HDMM was in general more sensitive when compared with OSMS in capturing the motion, due to its faster frame rate, but a delay in response was observed with faster speeds. Both systems were less sensitive in detection of superior-inferior motion when compared to lateral or vertical displacement directions. CONCLUSION: Translational motion can be accurately and sensitively detected by OSMS and HDMM real-time monitoring systems. However, performance variations were observed along different motion directions, as well as amongst the selection of reference images. Caution is needed when using real-time monitoring systems for frameless SRS treatment.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for brain tumors in geriatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of studies assessing the use of MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), specifically in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of LITT for brain tumors in geriatric patients. METHODS: Geriatric patients (≥ 65 years of age) treated with LITT for intracranial tumors at a single institution between January 2011 and November 2019 were retrospectively identified. The authors grouped patients into two distinct age cohorts: 65-74 years (group 1) and 75 years or older (group 2). Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative course, and morbidity were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Fifty-five geriatric patients underwent 64 distinct LITT procedures for brain tumors. The majority of lesions (40 [62.5%]) treated were recurrent brain metastases or radiation necrosis. The median modified frailty index was 0.1 (low frailty; range 0-0.4) for patients in group 1 and 0.2 (intermediate frailty; range 0-0.4) for patients in group 2 (p > 0.05). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1 day (IQR 1-2 days); there was no significant difference in LOS between the age groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who presented with a neurological symptom and in those who experienced a postoperative complication. The majority of patients (43 [68.3%] of 63 cases) were fit for discharge to their preoperative accommodation following LITT. The rate of discharge to home was not significantly different between the age groups. Those discharged to rehabilitation facilities were more likely to have presented with a neurological symptom. Nine patients (14.1% of cases) were found to have acute neurological complications following LITT, with nearly all patients showing complete or partial recovery at follow-up. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.6% (1 case). The complication and 30-day postoperative mortality rates were not significantly different between the two age groups. CONCLUSIONS: LITT can be considered a minimally invasive and safe neurosurgical procedure for the treatment of intracranial tumors in geriatric patients. Careful preoperative preparation and postoperative care is essential as LITT is not without risk. Appropriate patient selection for cranial surgery is essential, because neurosurgeons are treating an increasing number of elderly patients, but advanced age alone should not exclude patients from LITT without considering frailty and comorbidities.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for posterior fossa neoplasms.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been increasingly used to treat a number of intracranial pathologies, though its use in the posterior fossa has been limited to a few small series. We performed a multi-institutional review of targets in the posterior fossa, reporting the efficacy and safety profile associated with laser ablation in this region of the brain. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing LITT in the posterior fossa was performed from August 2010 to March 2020. Patient demographic information was collected alongside the operative parameters and patient outcomes. Reported outcomes included local control of the lesion, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and steroid requirements. RESULTS: 58 patients across four institutions underwent LITT in the posterior fossa for 60 tumors. The median pre-ablation tumor volume was 2.24 cm3. 48 patients (50 tumors) were available for follow-up. An 84% (42/50) overall local control rate was achieved at 9.5 months median follow up. There were two procedural complications, including insertional hemorrhage and laser misplacement and 12/58 (21%) patients developed new neurological deficits. There was one procedure related death. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day, with 20.7% of patients requiring discharge to a rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: LITT is an effective approach for treating pathology in the posterior fossa. The average target size is smaller than what has been reported in the supratentorial space. Care must be taken to prevent injury to surrounding structures given the close proximity of critical structures in this region.

Characterization of Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Magnetic Resonance Guided Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has attempted to characterize this artifact. OBJECTIVE: To characterize MRTI signal the artifact in select cases to better understand its potential relevance and impact on the ablation procedure. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser ablation system (Medtronic). Patients were included if the MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region during the first thermal dose delivered. Ablation artifact was quantified using MATLAB version R2018a (Mathworks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 37.0% of cases overall. Incidence of artifact was greater at higher powers (P < .001) and with longer ablation times (P = .024), though artifact size did not correlate with laser power or ablation duration. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. Higher powers and longer ablation times result in greater incidence of ablation artifact, though artifact size is not correlated with power or duration. Future studies should aim to evaluate effects of artifact on postoperative imaging and, most notably, patient outcomes.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for in-field recurrence of brain metastasis after stereotactic radiosurgery: does treatment with LITT prevent a neurologic death?

Brain metastasis (BM) affects up to one-third of adults with cancer and carries a historically bleak prognosis. Despite advances in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), rates of in-field recurrence (IFR) after SRS range from 10 to 25%. High rates of neurologic death have been reported after SRS failure, particularly for recurrences deep in the brain and surgically inaccessible. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an emerging option in this setting, but its ability to prevent a neurologic death is unknown. In this study, we investigate the causes of death among patients with BM who undergo LITT for IFR after SRS. We conducted a single institution retrospective case series of patients with BM who underwent LITT for IFR after SRS. Clinical and demographic data were collected via chart review. The primary endpoint was cause of death. Between 2010 and 2018, 70 patients with BM underwent LITT for IFR after SRS. Median follow-up after LITT was 12.0 months. At analysis, 49 patients died; a cause was determined in 44. Death was neurologic in 20 patients and non-neurologic in 24. The 24-month cumulative incidence of neurologic and non-neurologic death was 35.1% and 38.6%, respectively. Etiologies of neurologic death included local recurrence (n = 7), recovery failure (n = 7), distant progression (n = 5), and other (n = 1). Among our patient population, LITT provided the ability to stabilize neurologic disease in up to 2/3 of patients. For IFR after SRS, LITT may represent a reasonable treatment strategy for select patients. Additional work is necessary to determine the extent to which LITT can prevent neurologic death after recurrence of BM.

Identification and Management of Progressive Enhancement After Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Results from a Neurosurgical Survey.

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of consensus regarding diagnosis, timing, and method of intervention for progressive enhancement on surveillance imaging after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of brain metastases. We sought to characterize current practices among neurosurgeons in identifying and treating infield tumor recurrence (TR) or radiation necrosis (RN) after SRS for brain metastases. METHODS: A voluntary survey was distributed electronically to preidentified neurosurgeons. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants completed the survey from 72 U.S. and 17 international centers. Most (69.2%) agreed that growth over ≥2 surveillance scans spaced ≥90 days apart identified irreversible progression after SRS for brain metastases. Respondents were evenly divided on the need for tissue biopsy to distinguish between TR and RN. Preferred treatment modality and time frame to initiate treatment of suspected RN differed among neurosurgeons based on SRS case volume for brain metastases (P = 0.002 and P = 0.02, respectively). Neurosurgeons who used magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for brain metastases were more likely to prefer LITT for suspected RN, whereas those with minimal LITT experience preferred steroids (P < 0.0001). Neurosurgeons in the United States were more likely to prefer LITT for RN (37.3%) compared with international counterparts (0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey of practicing neurosurgeons highlights areas of controversy in distinguishing between TR and RN and preferred management of suspected RN.

Effects of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy on Thermal Damage Estimate and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ablative Area Concordance.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has considered the impact of this artifact on TDE accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of intraoperative MRTI signal artifact on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-predicted ablative area. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Patients were grouped based on whether the intraoperative MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region. Cross-sectional area of the ablative lesion from the MRI image was measured, and the difference between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was calculated and compared between groups with and without intraoperative MRTI artifact. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 43.9% of cases overall. The mean absolute difference between TDE and the postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was 94.8 mm2 (SEM = 11.6) in the group with intraoperative MRTI artifact and 54.4 mm2 (SEM = 5.5) in the nonartifact group. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. The presence of signal artifact during intraoperative MRTI results in higher variation between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional ablative area. In cases in which intraoperative MRTI artifact is observed, there may be a larger degree of variation between observed intraoperative TDE and measured postoperative MRTI ablative area.

Understanding the Relationship Between Real-Time Thermal Imaging and Thermal Damage Estimate During Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy is a minimally invasive procedure that uses intraoperative magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. This study aimed to compare areas produced by the MRT heat map with the system-generated TDE produced by Visualase software. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase laser ablation system. MRT heat map and TDE were quantified using MATLAB version R2014a. TDE was compared with the summed area of green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 63.9 [HM63.9]) and the summed area of light blue, green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 50.4 [HM50.4]) produced by the MRT heat map. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients undergoing magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy were examined. Mean TDE produced was 236 mm2 (SEM = 9.5). Mean HM63.9 was 231 mm2 (SEM = 8.7), and mean HM50.4 was 370 mm2 (SEM = 12.8). There was no significant difference between TDE and HM63.9 (P = 0.51). There was a significant difference between TDE and HM50.4 (P < 0.001) and between HM63.9 and HM50.4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The system-generated TDE consistently remains contained within the boundaries of the MRT heat map. At standard factory settings, TDE and the area produced within the periphery of HM63.9 are similar in magnitude. The light blue portion of the MRT heat map may serve as an additional means of predicting when critical structures may be at risk during laser ablation if exposed to further thermal stress.