ABSTRACT
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [...].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaccines that prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered the most promising approach to modulating the pandemic. There is scarce evidence on the efficacy and safety of different vaccine prime-boost combinations in MHD patients since most clinical trials have used homologous mRNA vaccine regimens. METHODS: This prospective observational study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of homologous CoronaVac® (SV-SV), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) (AZ-AZ), and the heterologous prime-boost of SV-AZ, among MHD patients. RESULTS: A total of 130 MHD participants were recruited. On day 28, after the second dose, seroconversion results of the surrogate virus neutralization test were not different between vaccine regimens. The magnitude of the receptor-binding domain-specific IgG was highest among the SV-AZ. Different vaccine regimens had a distinct impact on seroconversion, for which the heterologous vaccine regimen demonstrated a higher probability of seroconversion (OR 10.12; p = 0.020, and OR 1.81; p = 0.437 for SV-AZ vs. SV-SV, and SV-AZ vs. AZ-AZ, respectively). There were no serious adverse events reported in any of the vaccine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with SV-SV, AZ-AZ, and SV-AZ could generate humoral immunity without any serious adverse events among MHD patients. Using the heterologous vaccine prime-boost seemed to be more efficacious in terms of inducing immunogenicity.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between in-house and commercial binding-specific IgG antibodies and between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNT). Samples from healthcare workers who received vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were tested for RBD-specific antibody, S-specific antibody, and in-house ELISA, commercial sVNT, and in-house sVNT, against wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Three hundred and five samples were included in the analysis. The correlation between S-specific binding antibodies and in-house ELISA was 0.96 (95% CI 0.96-0.97) and between RBD-specific antibodies and in-house ELISA was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97). The Cohen's kappa between in-house sVNT and the commercial test was 0.90 (95% CI 0.80, 1.00). If using 90% inhibition of sVNT as the reference standard, the optimal cut-off value of RBD-specific antibodies was 442.7 BAU/mL, the kappa, sensitivity, and specificity being 0.99, 99%, and 100%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of S-specific antibodies was 1155.9 BAU/mL, the kappa, sensitivity, and specificity being 0.99, 100%, and 99%, respectively. This study demonstrated a very strong correlation between in-house ELISA and 2 commercial assays. There was also a very strong correlation between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 sVNT, a finding of particular interest which will inform future research.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Neutralization Tests , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoassay , Immunoglobulin G , Antibodies, Viral , Antibodies, NeutralizingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bee venom (BV) hypersensitivity can be severe and potentially life-threatening. Beekeepers heavily exposed to bee stings and are thus at a high-risk group. The data on bee sting reactions among beekeepers in Thailand is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, clinical and immunological characteristics, and the knowledge of BV hypersensitivity in Thai beekeepers. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire survey about BV reactions in beekeepers were conducted. Further blood test for immunological parameters: serum BV-specific IgE (BV sIgE), phospholipase A2-specific IgE (Api m1 sIgE), and BV-specific IgG4 (BV sIgG4) were compared between non-allergic beekeepers, patients with a history of bee sting anaphylaxis and the non-allergic control group. RESULTS: A total of 202 out of 447 questionnaires (response rate 45%) were returned. The median age was 46.7 years. Systemic reactions were documented in 6.4%. Younger than 45 years was found to be a factor associated with systemic reactions (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.16-16.31). The BV sIgE and Api m1 sIgE were significantly higher in the anaphylaxis group (p = 0.001). The median of BV sIgG4 was significantly higher in non-allergic beekeepers (p = 0.001). For the knowledge of BV hypersensitivity, 56.4% recognized that BV hypersensitivity could be fatal but only 6% knew about epinephrine auto-injector device. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of systemic reactions after stings among Thai beekeepers was not high, which might be due to the tolerance induced by natural exposure via sIgG4. The level of knowledge of BV hypersensitivity among beekeepers was insufficient, more education must be provided.
