Increasing Incremental Burden of Surgical Bleeding Associated with Multiple Comorbidities as Measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

Purpose: Disruptive bleeding can complicate surgical procedures, increasing resource use, and impacting patients' well-being. This study aims to elucidate the impact of comorbidity on the risk of disruptive surgical-related bleeding and selected transfusion-associated complications, as well as the incremental cost of such bleeding. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database included patients who were age ≥18 years and who had a procedure of interest between 1-Jan-2019-31-Dec-2019: cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, cystectomy, hepatectomy, hysterectomy, pancreatectomy, peripheral vascular, thoracic, and valve procedures (first=index). The Elixhauser comorbidity index was assessed on index date and patients were grouped by cumulative comorbidity score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ≥6). Outcomes, all measured as in-hospital during index, included bleeding (diagnosis and/or intervention for bleeding), transfusion-associated complications (diagnosis of infection, acute renal failure, or vascular events), and incremental total hospital costs associated with bleeding. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to examine the association of comorbidity/bleeding with outcomes. Results: Of the 304,074 patients included, 7% experienced bleeding. The Elixhauser scores were distributed as follows: 0=29%, 1=23%, 2=18%, 3=12%, 4=8%, 5=5%, ≥6=5%. Odds of bleeding significantly increased with Elixhauser score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (odds ratio [OR] =1.30, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] =1.19-1.43), and this trend continued to surge (≥6 comorbidities [OR=3.22, 95% CI=2.94-3.53]). Similarly, the odds of transfusion-associated complications significantly increased with comorbidities score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.88-2.34), ≥6 comorbidities vs 0 (OR=12.37, 95% CI=10.80-14.16). The incremental cost of bleeding also increased with comorbidities score; per-patient costs with and without bleeding were $18,132 vs $13,190, p < 0.001 among patients with 0 comorbidities and $28,952 vs $19,623, p < 0.001 among patients with ≥6 comorbidities. Conclusion: Higher comorbidity burden was associated with significant increases in the risk of surgical bleeding, subsequent transfusion-related complications, and incremental cost burden of bleeding.

Isolating and characterizing cluster AB Mycobacteriophage NoShow, which encodes lysis proteins shared with cluster H2 phages.

We present here Mycobacteriophage NoShow, isolated from a soil sample collected on the Maguire Campus of Saint Joseph's University in Merion Station, Pennsylvania. Even though NoShow's 52,825 bp genome is most similar to phages in cluster AB, its lysA and lysB genes are most similar to phages in cluster H2.

Bleeding-Related Complications and Readmission Rates Associated With Fibrin Sealant Use in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and economic outcomes of EVICEL (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) and TISSEEL (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA) use in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Premier prospective hospital database (June 2009 through March 2014) covering approximately 20% of hospital discharges in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing primary CABG surgery who received either EVICEL or TISSEEL on the day of surgery (index date). INTERVENTIONS: Two intervention groups were formed, EVICEL and TISSEEL. Clinical outcomes compared included postoperative bleeding complications (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code: 998.1) and number of blood transfusions received on the index day. Economic outcomes compared included hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and 30-day readmission rates. Propensity-score matching was used to control for patient and hospital characteristics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 129,014 primary CABG surgery patients were identified; 986 patients (mean age: 64 years, 73% male) received EVICEL and 6,340 patients (mean age: 65 years, 75% male) received TISSEEL on the index day. After propensity-score matching, patients who received EVICEL compared with TISSEEL had significantly fewer postoperative bleeding complications (3.0% v 5.0%, p = 0.0197), index-day blood transfusion rates (19% v 34%, p<0.0001), readmission rates (18% v 32%, p<0.0001), and costs ($40,736 [standard deviation $19,465] v $46,005 [standard deviation $24,049], p<0.0001). Results from a sensitivity analysis using a generalized linear model to control for other hemostatic agent use also favored EVICEL over TISSEEL. CONCLUSION: Results from this real-world retrospective database analysis showed fewer bleeding complications and lower costs in patients undergoing primary CABG surgery who received EVICEL compared with TISSEEL.