Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 62(12): 19, 2021 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546325

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The functional characteristics of receptors that regulate lacrimal gland myoepithelial cells are still somewhat unclear. To date, mainly muscarinic receptors have been of interest; however, further knowledge is needed regarding their expression and functional roles. For this purpose, primary cultures of rat lacrimal gland myoepithelial cells were established and examined functionally. Methods: Rat lacrimal glands were excised, minced, and further digested, yielding mixtures of cells that were seeded in culturing flasks. After 4-6 weeks, primary monocultures of myoepithelial cells were established, verified by immunocytochemistry. The cells were stained for all muscarinic receptor subtypes (M1-M5) and examined functionally regarding intracellular [Ca2+] responses upon activation of muscarinic receptors. For methodological verification, purinergic functional responses were also studied. Results: Expression of muscarinic receptor subtypes M2-M5 was detected, whereas expression of muscarinic M1 receptors could not be shown. Activation of muscarinic receptors by the non-selective muscarinic agonist methacholine (3 × 10-11-10-3 M) did not cause a significant increase in intracellular [Ca2+]. However, activation of purinergic receptors by the non-selective purinergic agonist ATP (10-8-10-3 M) caused a concentration-dependent increase in intracellular [Ca2+] that could be blocked by the P2 antagonists PPADS and suramin. Conclusions: Primary cultures of rat lacrimal gland myoepithelial cells were established that displayed a heterogeneous expression of muscarinic receptors. Purinergic functional responses demonstrated a viable cell population. Upon treatment with methacholine, no significant increase in intracellular [Ca2+] could be detected, indicating that cholinergic activation of myoepithelial cells occurs via other intracellular messengers or is dependent on interaction with other cell types.


Subject(s)
Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Lacrimal Apparatus/metabolism , Receptors, Muscarinic/metabolism , Receptors, Purinergic/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/pharmacology , Animals , Calcium/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Epithelial Cells/cytology , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Immunohistochemistry , Lacrimal Apparatus/cytology , Lacrimal Apparatus/drug effects , Male , Methacholine Chloride/pharmacology , Muscarinic Agonists/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
2.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 62(7): 8, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34096973

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Patients that medicate with antidepressants commonly report dryness of eyes. The cause is often attributed to the anticholinergic properties of the drugs. However, regulation of tear production includes a substantial reflex-evoked component and is regulated via distinct centers in the brain. Further, the anticholinergic component varies greatly among antidepressants with different mechanisms of action. In the current study it was wondered if acute administration of antidepressants can disturb production of tears by affecting the afferent and/or central pathway. Methods: Tear production was examined in vivo in anesthetized rats in the presence or absence of the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) clomipramine or the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram. The reflex-evoked production of tears was measured by challenging the surface of the eye with menthol (0.1 mM) and cholinergic regulation was examined by intravenous injection with the nonselective muscarinic agonist methacholine (1-5 µg/kg). Results: Acute administration of clomipramine significantly attenuated both reflex-evoked and methacholine-induced tear production. However, escitalopram only attenuated reflex-evoked tear production, while methacholine-induced production of tears remained unaffected. Conclusions: This study shows that antidepressants with different mechanisms of action can impair tear production by attenuating reflex-evoked signaling. Further, antimuscarinic actions are verified as a likely cause of lacrimal gland hyposecretion in regard to clomipramine but not escitalopram. Future studies on antidepressants with different selectivity profiles and mechanisms of action are required to further elucidate the mechanisms by which antidepressants affect tear production.


Subject(s)
Citalopram/pharmacology , Clomipramine/pharmacology , Dry Eye Syndromes , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Lacrimal Apparatus , Tears/physiology , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Cholinergic Antagonists/pharmacology , Dry Eye Syndromes/chemically induced , Dry Eye Syndromes/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/drug effects , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Lacrimal Apparatus/drug effects , Lacrimal Apparatus/physiology , Methacholine Chloride/pharmacology , Miotics/pharmacology , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...