Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Coll Health ; 71(8): 2612-2621, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670105

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To increase administration of influenza (flu), human papillomavirus (HPV) and meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccinations to students at college student health centers (SHCs). PARTICIPANTS: Improvement teams from 45 US-based SHCs. METHODS: Teams participated in a 7-month virtual learning collaborative to implement immunization delivery best practices at their SHCs. A pre-post-intervention design was used to compare vaccination coverage in May 2017 to May 2018 among students who were unvaccinated at the start of the academic year. RESULTS: Data were compared from 29 SHCs and 152,648 students (2017) and from 18 SHCs and 122,315 students (2018). Percent of newly vaccinated students increased for ≥1 dose of flu vaccine by 14.3 percentage points to 32.3% (p < .01), ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine by 3.9 points to 7.8% (p < .05) and ≥3 doses of HPV vaccine by 0.7 points to 1.5% (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Participating in a learning collaborative may help SHCs improve vaccination delivery.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Meningococcal Vaccines , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Humans , Quality Improvement , Universities , Students , Vaccination , Immunization , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use
2.
J Am Coll Health ; 70(2): 428-435, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32407196

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The interventions colleges use to help students be compliant with vaccinations is unknown. This study describes colleges' use of practices consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations to encourage student body vaccination. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were a convenience sample of 136 student health center (SHC) administrators from colleges across the U.S. METHODS: An online survey assessed SHCs' use of various practices, policies and services to improve student body vaccination coverage. RESULTS: There was wide variability in use of evidence-based interventions overall and with respect to specific vaccinations. While most SHCs (92.7%) coordinated vaccination outreach events on campus, only half (50%) accessed an immunization registry to verify vaccination histories. While 88.6% requested student vaccination histories for MMR, only 39.7% requested it for human papillomavirus (HPV). CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancies in SHC implementation of interventions to increase coverage of the recommended vaccinations for students suggest that helping colleges expand their capacity to intervene may decrease coverage rate disparities.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Vaccines , Vaccination Coverage , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Students , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Vaccination
3.
Vaccine ; 38(46): 7350-7356, 2020 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33010977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most Neisseria meningitidis involved in invasive disease among American college students express serogroup B antigen. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends healthcare providers (HCPs) share clinical decision making with patients to determine individual value of meningococcal serogroup B vaccination (MenB) rather than routinely recommend vaccination as with the meningococcal A,C,W,Y vaccine (MenACWY). This study examines the attitudes and practices of HCPs working in college student health centers (SHCs) regarding the recommendation and administration of MenB to students. METHODS: The study was conducted as an online and phone survey of SHC HCPs from a sample of colleges across the United States between May 2017 and July 2018. Items compared college SHC policies and practices for MenB to those for MenACWY. It also assessed perceived barriers to and facilitators of MenB delivery to students. RESULTS: Among the 147 respondents, almost 50% more reported their SHC stocked and administered MenACWY (54.1%) than MenB (37%) (p = .004). Almost five times as many colleges required their students receive MenACWY as MenB (53.5% vs. 10.5%, p < .001). A greater percentage requested students to submit records for MenACWY than MenB (77.3% vs. 46.9%, p < .001), and over three times as many tracked student-body coverage rates for MenACWY than MenB (55.6% vs. 15.8%, p < .001). Nearly three quarters of respondents estimated their college's student body MenB coverage rate to be ≤ 10% or were unable to provide any estimate. Factors perceived by over half of the participants as moderate to extreme barriers to administering MenB included high upfront costs for SHCs to purchase and stock MenB (68.7%), and high out-of-pocket costs for students to receive it (82.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of college SHCs require, offer or track Men B vaccination on their campuses. Financial concerns are common barriers to SHCs' stocking and administering MenB to students.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Humans , Male , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Serogroup , United States , Vaccination
4.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(5): e245-e252, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29227360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the importance of specific workplace environment characteristics for maximum health and performance, assigned by healthcare employees, and how they relate to the nature of their work. METHODS: A cross-sectional mixed-method study was conducted with content analysis and robust regression models to examine the relationship between workplace environment characteristics and perceived importance in promoting health and performance. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that perceptions of key environment characteristics that safeguard health and performance in healthcare workplaces may vary by employee sex, setting, and nature of healthcare work involved. Theme and model descriptions of the influence of these factors on participant perceptions are provided. CONCLUSIONS: Employee feedback on workplace characteristics that impact health and performance could be instrumental in determining the priorities of workplace design.


Subject(s)
Health Facility Environment , Health Personnel/psychology , Occupational Health , Work Performance , Workplace , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...