COVID-19 was not associated or trigger disease activity in spondylarthritis patients: ReumaCoV-Brasil cross-sectional data.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the disease activity before and after COVID-19 and risk factors associated with outcomes, including hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation (MV) and death in patients with spondylarthritis (SpA). METHODS: ReumaCoV Brazil is a multicenter prospective cohort of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) patients with COVID-19 (case group), compared to a control group of IMRD patients without COVID-19. SpA patients enrolled were grouped as axial SpA (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and enteropathic arthritis, according to usual classification criteria. RESULTS: 353 SpA patients were included, of whom 229 (64.9%) were axSpA, 118 (33.4%) PsA and 6 enteropathic arthritis (1.7%). No significant difference was observed in disease activity before the study inclusion comparing cases and controls, as well no worsening of disease activity after COVID-19. The risk factors associated with hospitalization were age over 60 years (OR = 3.71; 95% CI 1.62-8.47, p = 0.001); one or more comorbidities (OR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.02-5.08, p = 0.001) and leflunomide treatment (OR = 4.46; 95% CI 1.33-24.9, p = 0.008). Not having comorbidities (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.50, p = 0.001) played a protective role for hospitalization. In multivariate analysis, leflunomide treatment (OR = 8.69; CI = 95% 1.41-53.64; p = 0.023) was associated with hospitalization; teleconsultation (OR = 0.14; CI = 95% 0.03-0.71; p = 0.01) and no comorbidities (OR = 0.14; CI = 95% 0.02-0.76; p = 0.02) remained at final model as protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no association between pre-COVID disease activity or that SARS-CoV-2 infection could trigger disease activity in patients with SpA. Teleconsultation and no comorbidities were associated with a lower hospitalization risk. Leflunomide remained significantly associated with higher risk of hospitalization after multiple adjustments.

Resistance exercises improve physical function in chronic Chikungunya fever patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chikungunya fever is an arboviral disease, caused by an alphavirus, the Chikungunya virus, characterized by fever and joint pain that is generally disabling in the acute phase and may last from months to years, with the potential to evolve into chronic musculoskeletal symptoms, as polyarthralgia and arthritis, which can lead to significant impairment of physical function. The non-pharmacological treatment is very important for these patients, and resistance exercises may be one rehabilitation option. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a resistance exercise protocol on the physical function, pain, and quality of life of patients with chronic Chikungunya fever. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, blind trial for the evaluators. SETTING: Clinic-school of Physical therapy. POPULATION: Thirty-one patients with Chikungunya fever and musculoskeletal symptoms lasting more than three months, recruited from the Rheumatology outpatient clinic at Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco (HC-UFPE). METHODS: Patients (aged 56±10 years) were randomly assigned into one of two groups: Resistance Exercise Group (REG, N.=15) or Control Group (CG, N.=16). REG performed progressive resistance exercises with elastic bands (24 sessions over 12 weeks). CG only had their symptoms monitored through phone calls, maintaining the usual care treatment. Assessments were taken at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of the following: physical function (30-second Chair Stand Test (30-s CST), 4-step Stair Climb Power Test (4SCPT), 40-m Fast-paced Walk Test (40m FPWT), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire); pain (VAS and painful joints count); quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]); and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. RESULTS: There was a reduction of pain (P=0.01; d=-0.83) and an improvement of 30-s CST (P=0.04; d=0.85) in REG participants after 12 weeks. There was no significant change in the domains of SF-36. Nearly 70% of trained patients reported improvement on PGIC. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance exercises improved physical function in sitting and standing and reduced pain in patients with chronic Chikungunya fever. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Resistance exercises can be considered as a treatment approach for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in the chronic stage of Chikungunya fever.

Losartan, but not Enalapril and Valsartan, Inhibits the Expression of IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-17F and IL-22 in PBMCs from Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic and inflammatory disease that affects about 1% of the world's population. Almost 70% of RA patients have a cardiovascular disease such as Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH). Inflammatory cytokines are clearly involved in the pathogenesis of RA and correlated with SAH. OBJECTIVE: It is necessary to understand whether the antihypertensive drugs have a dual effect as immunomodulators and which one is the best choice for RA SAH patients. METHODS: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) from 16 RA patients were purified and stimulated or not stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 mAB and were treated with Enalapril, Losartan and Valsartan at 100µM. Patients were evaluated for clinical and laboratory variables including measures of disease activity by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Disease Activity Score (DAS28). Cytokines were quantified by ELISA sandwich. RESULTS: Losartan was able to reduce levels of IFN-γ (p = 0.0181), IL-6 (p = 0.0056), IL-17F (0.0046) and IL-22 (p = 0.0234) in RA patients. In addition, patients in remission and mild score (DAS28<3.2 and CDAI<10) had a better response to treatment. On the other hand, patients in moderate and severe activity had poor response to Losartan in cytokine inhibition. CONCLUSION: PBMCs from RA patients are responsive in inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines using Losartan better than Enalapril and Valsartan and it could be a better antihypertensive choice for patients with RA and systemic arterial hypertension treatment.