ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of hormonal contraception (HC) on the development and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) and the time for normalization of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with women diagnosed with molar pregnancy, followed at the Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, between January 2005 and January 2015. The occurrence of postmolar GTN and the time for hCG normalization between users of HC or barrier methods (BM) during the postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 2828 patients included in this study, 2680 (95%) used HC and 148 (5%) used BM. The use of HC did not significantly influence the occurrence of GTN (ORa: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.24-1.12, p=0.060), despite different formulations: progesterone-only (ORa: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29-1.01, p=0.060) or combined oral contraception (COC) (ORa: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-1.01, p=0.60) or with different dosages of ethinyl estradiol: 15mcg (ORa, 1.33, 95% CI 0.79-2.24, p=0.288), 20mcg (ORa: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.64-1.65, p=0.901), 30mcg (ORa: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.78-1.75, p=0.437) or 35mcg (ORa: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42-1.39, p=0.386). Time to hCG normalization ≥10weeks (ORa: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-1.08, p=0.071) or time to remission with chemotherapy≥14weeks (ORa: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-1.09, p=0.067) did not significantly differ among HC users when compared to patients using BM, when controlling for other risk factors using multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HC during postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment does not seem to increase the risk of GTN or its severity and does not postpone the normalization of hCG levels.
Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Gestational Trophoblastic Disease/epidemiology , Hydatidiform Mole/therapy , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood , Cohort Studies , Contraceptive Devices, Female , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gestational Trophoblastic Disease/blood , Gestational Trophoblastic Disease/etiology , Gestational Trophoblastic Disease/pathology , Humans , Hydatidiform Mole/blood , Hydatidiform Mole/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of hydatidiform mole (HM) management setting (reference center versus other institutions) on gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) outcomes. METHODS: This cohort study included 270 HM patients attending Botucatu Trophoblastic Diseases Center (BTDC, São Paulo State University, Brazil) between January 1990 and December 2009 (204 undergoing evacuation and entire postmolar follow-up at BTDC and 66 from other institutions [OIs]). GTN characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared according to HM management setting. The confounding variables assessed included age, gravidity, parity, number of abortions and HM type (complete or partial). Postmolar GTN outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney's test, chi2 test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Postmolar GTN occurred in 34 (34/204 = 16.7%) BTDC patients and in 27 (27/66 = 40.9%) of those initially treated in other institutions. BTDC patients showed lower metastasis rate (5.8% vs. 48%, p = 0.003) and lower median FIGO (2002) score (2.00 [1.00, 3.00] vs. 4.00 [2.00, 7.00], p = 0.003]. Multiagent chemotherapy to treat postmolar GTN was required in 2 BTDC cases (5.9%) and in 8 OI cases (29.6%) (p = 0.017). Median time interval between molar evacuation and chemotherapy onset was shorter among BTDC patients (7.0 [6.0, 10.0] vs. 10.0 [7.0, 16.0], p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: BTDC patients showed GTN characteristics indicative of better prognosis. This underscores the importance of GTD specialist centers.
