Utility of standard diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the identification of ischemic optic neuropathy in giant cell arteritis.

This study assessed diffusion abnormalities of the optic nerve (ON) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients with acute onset of visual impairment (VI) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). DWI scans of GCA patients with acute VI were evaluated in a case-control study. Two blinded neuroradiologists assessed randomized DWI scans of GCA and controls for ON restricted diffusion. Statistical quality criteria and inter-rater reliability (IRR) were calculated. DWI findings were compared to ophthalmological assessments. 35 GCA patients (76.2 ± 6.4 years; 37 scans) and 35 controls (75.7 ± 7.6 years; 38 scans) were included. ON restricted diffusion was detected in 81.1% (Reader 1) of GCA scans. Localization of ON restricted diffusion was at the optic nerve head in 80.6%, intraorbital in 11.1% and affecting both segments in 8.3%. DWI discerned affected from unaffected ON with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 87%/99%/96%/96%. IRR for ON restricted diffusion was κinter = 0.72 (95% CI 0.59-0.86). DWI findings challenged ophthalmologic diagnoses in 4 cases (11.4%). DWI visualizes anterior and posterior ON ischemia in GCA patients with high sensitivity and specificity, as well as substantial IRR. DWI may complement the ophthalmological assessment in patients with acute VI.

Detectability of Retinal Diffusion Restriction in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion is Linked to Inner Retinal Layer Thickness.

PURPOSE: To investigate retinal microstructure differences in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) patients with and without visible retinal diffusion restriction (RDR) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). METHODS: Consecutive CRAO patients with available optical coherence tomography (OCT) and DWI, both performed within 7 days after symptom onset, were included in a retrospective cohort study. The OCT scans were reviewed to assess retinal layer thickness, optical intensity and structural integrity. The OCT findings were compared between patients with and without visible RDR on DWI using Mann-Whitney U or Pearson's Χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (mean age 70.8 ± 12.8 years) were included. RDR was observed in 38 subjects (67.9%) with visually correlating low ADC map in 26 of 38 cases (68.4%). Superior and inferior parafoveal macular thickness measurements (SMT, IMT) of RDR negative patients were significantly lower when compared to RDR+ patients (370.5 ± 43.8 µm vs. 418.2 ± 76.0 µm, p = 0.016; 374.4 ± 42.9 µm vs. 428.8 ± 63.2 µm, p = 0.004) due to differences in inner retinal layer thickness (IRLT, 188.8 ± 34.4 µm vs. 234.7 ± 49.0 µm, p = 0.002). IRLT values of RDR negative patients were higher in 1.5T compared to 3T the DWI (205.0 ± 26.0 µm vs. 168.6 ± 32.8 µm, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Detectability of RDR is likely contingent upon the degree of ischemic retinal swelling in CRAO. Technical adjustments to the DWI protocol, such as increased field strength, may improve visibility of RDR.

Time Course and Clinical Correlates of Retinal Diffusion Restrictions in Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retinal diffusion restrictions were recently identified as a regular finding in acute central retinal artery occlusion. We sought to investigate the influence of technical MR imaging and clinical parameters on the detection rate of retinal diffusion restrictions on standard brain DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, MR imaging scans of patients with central retinal artery occlusion were assessed by 2 readers for retinal diffusion restrictions on DWI performed within 2 weeks after vision loss. The influence of clinical and technical MR imaging parameters and the time interval between symptom onset and DWI on the presence of retinal diffusion restrictions were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (mean age, 69.6 [SD 13.9] years; 59 women) and 131 DWI scans were included. Overall, the MR imaging sensitivity of retinal diffusion restrictions in acute central retinal artery occlusion was 62.6%-67.2%. Interrater and intrarater agreement for retinal diffusion restrictions was "substantial" with κinter = 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and κintra = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.88). Detection of retinal diffusion restrictions did not differ with differences in field strengths (1.5 versus 3T, P = .35) or sequence type (P = .22). Retinal diffusion restrictions were consistently identified within the first week with a peak sensitivity of 79% in DWI performed within 24 hours after symptom onset. Sensitivity of retinal diffusion restrictions declined in the second week (10.0%, P < .001). Absence of retinal diffusion restrictions was more prevalent in patients without fundoscopic retinal edema (60% versus 27.1%, P = .004) and with restitution of visual acuity at discharge (75% versus 28.4%, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal diffusion restrictions in acute central retinal artery occlusion can be reliably identified on DWI performed within 24 hours and 1 week after onset of visual impairment. Detectability of retinal diffusion restrictions is dependent on the clinical course of the disease.

Standard Diffusion-weighted MRI for the Diagnosis of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion : A Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion abnormalities of the retina and optic nerve in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) using standard stroke diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). METHODS: In this case-control study, DWI scans of patients with nonarteritic CRAO were retrospectively assessed for acute ischemia of the retina and optic nerve. Two neuroradiologists, blinded for patient diagnosis, randomly evaluated DWI of CRAO patients and controls (a collective of stroke and transient ischemic attack [TIA] patients) for restrictions of the retina and optic nerve. We calculated statistical quality criteria and analyzed inter-rater reliability using unweighted Kappa statistics. RESULTS: 20 CRAO patients (60,6 ± 17 years) and 20 controls (60,7 ± 17 years) were included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for retinal DWI restrictions were 75%/80%/79%/76% (reader 1) and 75%/100%/100%/80% (reader 2), respectively. Unweighted Kappa was κ = 0,70 (95% CI 0,48­0,92), indicating "substantial" interrater reliability. In comparison, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (positive and negative predictive values) for restrictions of the optic nerve in CRAO were 55%/70%/65%/61% (reader 1) and 25%/100%/100%/57% (reader 2). Inter-rater reliability was "fair" with unweighted Kappa κ = 0,32 (95% CI 0,09­0,56). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal diffusion restrictions were present in a majority of CRAO patients and detectable with reasonable sensitivity, high specificity and substantial inter-rater reliability. Further studies are necessary to study time dependency of retinal diffusion restrictions, improve image quality and investigate the reliability of retinal DWI to discern CRAO from other causes of acute loss of vision.