Two neural streams, one voice: pathways for theme and variation in the songbird brain.

Birdsong offers a unique model system to understand how a developing brain - once given a set of purely acoustic targets - teaches itself the vocal-tract gestures necessary to imitate those sounds. Like human infants, to juvenile male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) falls the burden of initiating the vocal-motor learning of adult sounds. In both species, adult caregivers provide only a set of sounds to be imitated, with little or no information about the vocal-tract gestures used to produce the sounds. Here, we focus on the central control of birdsong and review the recent discovery that zebra finch song is under dual premotor control. Distinct forebrain pathways for structured (theme) and unstructured (variation) singing not only raise new questions about mechanisms of sensory-motor integration, but also provide a fascinating new research opportunity. A cortical locus for a motor memory of the learned song is now firmly established, meaning that anatomical, physiological, and computational approaches are poised to reveal the neural mechanisms used by the brain to compose the songs of birds.

Electrocardiographic patterns and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of clockwise type I atrial flutter.

INTRODUCTION: Counterclockwise right atrial propagation is usually observed in common atrial flutter, but little is known regarding flutter with clockwise right atrial rotation. The aim of this study is to describe the ECG characteristics and results of catheter ablation of atrial flutter with clockwise right atrial rotation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the 38 patients with type I atrial flutter in this study population, right atrial impulse propagation was counterclockwise in 20 and clockwise in 8. In the remaining 10 patients, both clockwise and counterclockwise patterns were seen. Clinical and ECG parameters associated with clockwise flutter were compared to those of 28 cases of counterclockwise atrial flutter. Ablation was performed in 11 of 18 cases using a technique identical to that used for counterclockwise flutter. A classical "sawtooth" pattern of the flutter wave was observed in 28 of 28 counterclockwise and 14 of 18 clockwise flutter. A shorter plateau phase, a widening of the negative component of the F wave in the inferior leads, and a negative F wave in V1 were the most consistent findings in clockwise flutter. Coronary sinus recording always showed septal to lateral left atrial impulse propagation. Ablation was successful in 11 of 11 cases of clockwise flutter in whom this procedure was performed, with 9.5 +/- 11.6 radiofrequency pulses delivered between the tricuspid valve and the coronary sinus ostium (n = 5) or the inferior vena cava (n = 5), and in the proximal coronary sinus (n = 1). After a follow-up of 46.6 weeks, two recurrences of clockwise flutter were encountered, which were successfully treated with a second session. CONCLUSION: Contrary to commonly accepted concepts, clockwise rotation of atrial flutter is not an infrequent phenomenon and can mimic counterclockwise rotation. It can also be successfully ablated by radiofrequency pulses.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardias.

Atrial tachycardias are frequently unresponsive to medical therapy. His bundle ablation has been proposed as a palliative treatment to treat symptoms and prevent development of tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy. Experience with catheter ablation directed at the atrial origin of the tachycardia remains limited. We reviewed the initial success rate and long-term follow-up of radiofrequency ablation of atrial tachycardias. Thirty-six patients underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation of atrial tachycardias, excluding atrial flutter. The suspected mechanism of the clinical arrhythmia was automatic in 16 patients, intraatrial reentrant in 15, sinoatrial reentrant in 3, and unknown in 2. One or two ablation catheters with a 4 mm distal electrode were used to find (1) the earliest local atrial activation time compared to P-wave onset in the bipolar recording mode and (2) a QS pattern in the unipolar mode. When two ablation catheters were used, an encircling approach was taken. Pace-mapping during sinus rhythm and entrainment techniques were occasionally used for mapping. Tachycardia rose from the right atrium in 33 of 36 patients and from the left atrium in the remaining three. Three patients showed multiple foci during the procedure. Successful ablation was obtained in 31 (86%) of 36 patients, with a median of two radiofrequency applications (range 1 to 32) at 10 to 50 W for 10 to 60 seconds. Failure occurred in 5 patients (including the 3 patients with multiple atrial foci). Late follow-up (18 +/- 15 months) showed recurrence of atrial tachycardia in 2 patients, each of whom underwent a successful second ablation. Emergence of another atrial tachycardia was noted in 2 other patients, and an uncommon atrial flutter was noted in 1 patient with repaired atrial septal defect. No late sinus or atrioventricular nodal dysfunction were observed. In conclusion, radiofrequency catheter ablation is a safe and reasonable alternative for atrial tachycardias that do not respond to drugs. However, as previously suggested by the surgical experience, the success rate of ablation appears less satisfactory in patients with multiple sites of origin of ectopic atrial tachycardia.