Factors that influence survival in a probable Alzheimer disease cohort.

INTRODUCTION: This longitudinal study examined multiple factors that influence survival in a cohort of Alzheimer patients followed over two decades. METHODS: Time to death after symptom onset was determined in 641 probable AD patients who were evaluated annually until death or loss to follow-up, and information was entered into a longitudinal database. Date of death was available for everyone including those eventually lost. Baseline variables included age, sex, race, disease severity, a calculated index of rate of initial cognitive decline from symptom onset to cohort entry (pre-progression rate or PPR), years of education, and medical comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to analyze the baseline and/or time dependent association in Mini-mental Status Exam (MMSE) severity, Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS), Persistency Index (PI) of exposure to antipsychotic and antidementia drugs, and psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) with mortality. RESULTS: Baseline covariates significantly associated with increased survival were younger age (p = .0016), female sex (p = .0001), and a slower PPR (p < .0001). Overall disease severity at baseline, medical comorbidities, and education did not influence time to death. Time-dependent changes in antipsychotic drug use, development of psychotic symptoms, antidementia drug use, and observed MMSE change were not predictive. In the final model the only time-dependent covariate that significantly decreased survival was worsening of functional ability on the PSMS (hazard ratio = 1.10; CI: 1.07-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: In this large AD cohort survival is influenced by age, sex, and the development of functional disability during follow-up. The most important predictor of mortality was a faster rate of cognitive decline at the initial patient visit (PPR). The currently available antidementia drugs do not prolong survival in Alzheimer patients.

Vitamin E use is associated with improved survival in an Alzheimer's disease cohort.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin E at a dose of 2,000 IU per day has been shown to delay Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression, but recent studies have questioned the safety of this dose level and the overall efficacy of vitamin E in AD treatment. METHODS: We analyzed the survival history of 847 probable or mixed AD patients followed in a research center between 1990 and the censoring date of December 31, 2004. Standard practice during this period was to recommend vitamin E at 1,000 IU twice daily to all patients. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to assess the association of vitamin E alone, or in combination with a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI), with all-cause mortality, adjusting for important covariates. Approximately two thirds of the patients took vitamin E with a ChEI, 10% took vitamin E alone, and 15% took no antidementia drug. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with vitamin E (with or without a ChEI) was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.57-0.89; p = 0.003). Compared to the no drug treatment group, the HR for vitamin E alone or with another drug was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60-1.0); the HR for ChEI use alone was 1.2 (95% CI: 0.87-1.60). CONCLUSION: The results do not support a concern over increased mortality with high-dose vitamin E supplementation.

Persistent treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors and/or memantine slows clinical progression of Alzheimer disease.

INTRODUCTION: There are no empiric data to support guidelines for duration of therapy with antidementia drugs. This study examined whether persistent use of antidementia drugs slows clinical progression of Alzheimer disease (AD) assessed by repeated measures on serial tests of cognition and function. METHODS: Six hundred forty-one probable AD patients were followed prospectively at an academic center over 20 years. Cumulative drug exposure was expressed as a persistency index (PI) reflecting total years of drug use divided by total years of disease symptoms. Baseline and annual testing consisted of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination (BPMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL). Annual change in slope of neuropsychological and functional tests as predicted by follow-up time, PI, and the interaction of these two variables was evaluated. RESULTS: PI was associated with significantly slower rates of decline (with, without adjustment for covariates) on MMSE (P < 0.0001), PSMS (P < 0.05), IADL (P < 0.0001), and CDR-SB (P < 0.001). There was an insignificant trend (P = 0.053) for the PI to be associated with slower rate of decline on BPMSE. The association of PI with ADAS-Cog followed a quadratic trend (P < 0.01). Analysis including both linear and quadratic terms suggests that PI slowed ADAS-Cog decline temporarily. The magnitude of the favorable effect of a rate change in PI was: MMSE 1 point per year, PSMS 0.4 points per year, IADL 1.4 points per year, and CDR-SB 0.6 points per year. The change in mean test scores is additive over the follow-up period (3 +/- 1.94 years). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent drug treatment had a positive impact on AD progression assessed by multiple cognitive, functional, and global outcome measures. The magnitude of the treatment effect was clinically significant. Positive treatment effects were even found in those with advanced disease.

Is functional decline necessary for a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to examine baseline differences and annualized cognitive and functional change scores in mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with and without impaired activities of daily living (ADL). METHODS: We recruited 267 mild probable AD patients with at least 1 year of follow-up (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, MMSE>or=20). Based on initial ADL scores, they were divided into 2 groups: unimpaired (n=40) and impaired (n=227). We compared the differences in annualized change scores on MMSE, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), ADL and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of box score (CDR-SB) for patients with and without functional impairment at baseline. RESULTS: The group with unimpaired ADL at baseline had a significantly shorter symptom duration (p=0.01) and better neuropsychological test scores at baseline (p<0.001) than those with impaired ADL. The annualized cognitive and functional change of each group from baseline to 1-year follow-up was not significantly different on the MMSE, ADAS-cog, CDR-SB, Physical Self-Maintenance Scale and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. After 1 year, 56% of the initially unimpaired group and 6% of the initially impaired group reported no ADL impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that functional decline should not be required for the diagnosis of mild AD.