Utility-Based Dose Selection for Phase II Dose-Finding Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dose selection is a key feature of clinical development. Poor dose selection has been recognized as a major driver of development failure in late phase. It usually involves both efficacy and safety criteria. The objective of this paper is to develop and implement a novel fully Bayesian statistical framework to optimize the dose selection process by maximizing the expected utility in phase III. METHODS: The success probability is characterized by means of a utility function with two components, one for efficacy and one for safety. Each component refers to a dose-response model. Moreover, a sequential design (with futility and efficacy rules at the interim analysis) is compared to a fixed design in order to allow one to hasten the decision to perform the late phase study. Operating characteristics of this approach are extensively assessed by simulations under a wide range of dose-response scenarios. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Simulation results illustrate the difficulty of simultaneously estimating two complex dose-response models with enough accuracy to properly rank doses using an utility function combining the two. The probability of making the good decision increases with the sample size. For some scenarios, the sequential design has good properties: with a quite large probability of study termination at interim analysis, it enables to reduce the sample size while maintaining the properties of the fixed design.

Design optimization for dose-finding trials: a review.

Dose selection is one of the most difficult and crucial decisions to make during drug development. As a consequence, the dose-finding trial is a major milestone in the drug development plan and should be properly designed. This article will review the most recent methodologies for optimizing the design of dose-finding studies: all of them are based on the modeling of the dose-response curve, which is now the gold standard approach for analyzing dose-finding studies instead of the traditional ANOVA/multiple testing approach. We will address the optimization of both fixed and adaptive designs and briefly outline new methodologies currently under investigation, based on utility functions.

Considerations of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials.

Missing data exist in all clinical trials and missing data issue is a very serious issue in terms of the interpretability of the trial results. There is no universally applicable solution for all missing data problems. Methods used for handling missing data issue depend on the circumstances particularly the assumptions on missing data mechanisms. In recent years, if the missing at random mechanism cannot be assumed, conservative approaches such as the control-based and returning to baseline multiple imputation approaches are applied for dealing with the missing data issues. In this paper, we focus on the variability in data analysis of these approaches. As demonstrated by examples, the choice of the variability can impact the conclusion of the analysis. Besides the methods for continuous endpoints, we also discuss methods for binary and time to event endpoints as well as consideration for non-inferiority assessment.