Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs ; 23(1): 78-86, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19209064

ABSTRACT

One of the goals of Healthy People 2010 (set in 1998) was to reduce preterm birthrates from 11.6% to 7.6%. However, in 2004, the preterm birthrate of 12.5% was actually higher than the rate in 1998. Approximately 65% of this increase in prematurity rate is attributed to the increasing birthrate of the late preterm infant. Care of the late preterm infant is far more complicated than many hospital policies and clinical guidelines imply. It cannot be stressed enough to frontline clinicians that late preterm infants are not full-term infants. Their care should not be defined by the same policies and practices that govern term infants. The purpose of this article is to explore the complications that accompany late preterm birth. The following complications will be discussed: thermoregulation challenges, feeding difficulty, late neonatal sepsis, prolonged physiologic jaundice, hypoglycemia, possible neurodevelopmental differences, and respiratory problems.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Infant, Premature , Nurseries, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Postnatal Care/organization & administration , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Asphyxia Neonatorum/epidemiology , Asphyxia Neonatorum/prevention & control , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Congenital Abnormalities/prevention & control , Delivery Rooms , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Humans , Infant Care/organization & administration , Infant, Newborn , Jaundice, Neonatal/epidemiology , Jaundice, Neonatal/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
2.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 8(5 Suppl): S16-26, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18818538

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the baseline acoustic environment in several mid-Atlantic region neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and investigate the perceived factors contributing to noise levels in these NICUs. SUBJECTS: Quantitative data were collected from 3 urban, mid-Atlantic level IIIB and level IIIC NICUs. Qualitative data were collected via interview from 2 RNs employed in each of the study NICUs. DESIGN: This was an exploratory descriptive study utilizing a mixed-methods approach. A quantitative method was used for sound-level data collection, and a qualitative method was utilized during interviews with nurses to examine perceptions of factors contributing to noise. METHODS: Ambient sound levels, measured in decibels, were taken at 5-minute intervals over a 2-hour period during both day and night shifts in a central location at each NICU. In addition, nurses were interviewed using a standardized interview questionnaire, and these interviews were then reviewed to determine themes regarding perceived factors contributing to sound levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hourly mean sound levels in each NICU ranged from 53.9 dB to 60.6 dB, with no statistically significant difference between noise levels recorded on day shift versus night shift, and no statistically significant difference among sites. Qualitative data showed that nurses' believed day shift to be louder than night shift and many perceived their own NICU as "pretty quiet." Key contributing factors to increased sound levels were stated as monitors or alarms, performing invasive procedures, presence of family, nurses or doctors giving report or rounds, and ringing phones. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Noise levels were found to be above the American Academy of Pediatrics-recommended 45-dB level and often louder than the 50-dB level, which should not be exceeded more than 10% of the time. The recommended impulse maximum of 65 dB was also exceeded. Environmental Protection Agency recommendations for hospitals include sound levels no louder than 35 dB on night shift; this standard was also violated. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated sound levels need to be addressed in individual NICUs around the country. Further exploratory studies, as well as research regarding effective methods of decreasing sound levels in the NICU environment, are necessary. NICUs can implement behavioral and structural changes that can decrease the sound levels in the NICU environment and decrease the potential for exposure of patients to the harmful physiological effects of increased sound levels.

3.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 8(3): 165-75, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18535422

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the baseline acoustic environment in several mid-Atlantic region neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and investigate the perceived factors contributing to noise levels in these NICUs. SUBJECTS: Quantitative data were collected from 3 urban, mid-Atlantic level IIIB and level IIIC NICUs. Qualitative data were collected via interview from 2 RNs employed in each of the study NICUs. DESIGN: This was an exploratory descriptive study utilizing a mixed-methods approach. A quantitative method was used for sound-level data collection, and a qualitative method was utilized during interviews with nurses to examine perceptions of factors contributing to noise. METHODS: Ambient sound levels, measured in decibels, were taken at 5-minute intervals over a 2-hour period during both day and night shifts in a central location at each NICU. In addition, nurses were interviewed using a standardized interview questionnaire, and these interviews were then reviewed to determine themes regarding perceived factors contributing to sound levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hourly mean sound levels in each NICU ranged from 53.9 dB to 60.6 dB, with no statistically significant difference between noise levels recorded on day shift versus night shift, and no statistically significant difference among sites. Qualitative data showed that nurses' believed day shift to be louder than night shift and many perceived their own NICU as "pretty quiet." Key contributing factors to increased sound levels were stated as monitors or alarms, performing invasive procedures, presence of family, nurses or doctors giving report or rounds, and ringing phones. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: Noise levels were found to be above the American Academy of Pediatrics--recommended 45-dB level and often louder than the 50-dB level, which should not be exceeded more than 10% of the time. The recommended impulse maximum of 65 dB was also exceeded. Environmental Protection Agency recommendations for hospitals include sound levels no louder than 35 dB on night shift; this standard was also violated. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated sound levels need to be addressed in individual NICUs around the country. Further exploratory studies, as well as research regarding effective methods of decreasing sound levels in the NICU environment, are necessary. NICUs can implement behavioral and structural changes that can decrease the sound levels in the NICU environment and decrease the potential for exposure of patients to the harmful physiological effects of increased sound levels.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Communication , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medical Staff, Hospital , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Visitors to Patients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...