[Risk of radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases]. / Risque de radionécrose après radiothérapie hypofractionnée en conditions stéréotaxiques du lit opératoire de métastases cérébrales.

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors that potentially lead to brain radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis conducted in two French centres, was performed in patients treated with trifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (3×7.7Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line) for resected brain metastases. Patients with previous whole-brain irradiation were excluded of the analysis. Radionecrosis was diagnosed according to a combination of criteria including clinical, serial imaging or, in some cases, histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of radionecrosis including clinical and dosimetric variables such as volume of brain receiving a specific dose (V8Gy-V22Gy). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients, with a total of 189 cavities were treated between March 2008 and February 2015. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3-38 months) after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. One third of patients with radionecrosis were symptomatic. Multivariate analysis showed that infra-tentorial location was predictive of radionecrosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.47-6.01; P=0.0025). None V8Gy-V22Gy was associated with appearance of radionecrosis, even if V14Gy trended toward significance (P=0.059). CONCLUSION: Analysis of patients and treatment variables revealed that infratentorial location of brain metastases was predictive for radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative resection cavities.

Ziconotide intrathecal delivery as treatment for secondary therapeutic failure of motor cortex stimulation after 6 years.

INTRODUCTION: Motor cortex stimulation is a well-known treatment modality for refractory neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, some cases of therapeutic failure have been described but alternative therapies for these cases are rarely reported. CASE REPORT: The patient presented with neuropathic pain in his right arm due to a cervical syrinx which was surgically treated by a shunt in 2003 with no clinical improvement. As alternative therapy, after an evaluation by repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation with significant benefit, motor cortex stimulation was successfully implanted in 2004. In 2010, a similar pain occurred in the same territory. Local mean pain visual analogical scale (VAS) increased to 82/100. A newer generation stimulation device was then implanted and, within a period of 8months, different stimulation parameter settings were tested, without any pain relief. An intrathecal drug delivery pump was then implanted in 2011, and the upper extremity catheter was located at the cervicothoracic junction. There was no postoperative complication. A bitherapy was initiated at a daily dosage of 0.2mg morphine and 1.3µg ziconotide, not modified since August 2013. At 43months follow-up, mean VAS was 21/100 with improvement of daily life and spare-time activities, anxiety and depression, quality of life (as measured by the SF-36 survey and EQ5D-3L questionnaire). DISCUSSION: Refractory neuropathic pain treated by motor cortex stimulation may be considered in palliative situations, and secondary therapeutic failure offers only a few perspectives. Intrathecal ziconotide, indicated as a first-line drug in non-cancer pain, could be proposed in such cases. CONCLUSION: Intrathecal drug delivery including ziconotide in refractory neuropathic pain represents a reasonable option with a good clinical tolerance.