Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 34(6)2021 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32960264

ABSTRACT

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission.


Subject(s)
Esophagectomy , Patient Discharge , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(4)2020 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608938

ABSTRACT

Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Motility Disorders/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment/standards , Adult , Delphi Technique , Esophageal Motility Disorders/etiology , Female , Gastric Emptying , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Oncol ; 26(3): e372-e384, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31285682

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with limited-stage (ls) or extensive-stage (es) small-cell lung cancer (sclc) are commonly given platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Standard chemotherapy for patients with ls sclc includes a platinum agent such as cisplatin combined with the non-platinum agent etoposide. The objective of the present systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with es sclc and to determine the appropriate timing, dose, and schedule of chemotherapy or radiation for patients with sclc. Methods: The medline and embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy against treatment with chemotherapy alone in patients with es sclc. Identified rcts were also included if they compared various timings, doses, and schedules of treatment for patients with es sclc or ls sclc. Results: Sixty-four rcts were included. In patients with ls sclc, overall survival was greatest with platinum-etoposide compared with other chemotherapy regimens. In patients with es sclc, overall survival was greatest with chemotherapy containing platinum-irinotecan than with chemotherapy containing platinum-etoposide (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 0.95; p = 0.006). The addition of radiation to chemotherapy for patients with es sclc showed mixed results. There was no conclusive evidence that the timing, dose, or schedule of thoracic radiation affected treatment outcomes in sclc. Conclusions: In patients with ls sclc, cisplatin-etoposide plus radiotherapy should remain the standard therapy. In patients with es sclc, the evidence is insufficient to recommend the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy as standard practice to improve overall survival. However, on a case-by-case basis, radiotherapy might be added to reduce local recurrence. The most commonly used chemotherapy is platinum-etoposide; however, platinum-irinotecan can be considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Humans , Irinotecan/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Curr Oncol ; 26(2): e155-e161, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043821

ABSTRACT

Background: In Canada, requests for public reimbursement of cancer drugs are predominately initiated by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Clinician-led submissions provide a mechanism to initiate the drug funding process when industry does not submit a request for funding consideration. Although such requests are resource-intensive to produce, Cancer Care Ontario (cco) has the capacity to facilitate clinician-led submissions. In 2014, cco began developing a cancer drug prioritization framework that allocates resources to systematically address a growing number of clinician-identified funding gaps with clinician-led submissions. Methods: Cancer site-specific drug advisory committees established by cco consist of health care practitioners whose roles include identifying and prioritizing funding gaps. The committees submit their identified gaps to a cross-cancer-site prioritization exercise in which the requests are ranked based on a set of guiding principles derived from health technology assessment. The requests are then sequentially allocated the resources needed to meet submission requirements. Whether the funding gap is of provincial or pan-Canadian relevance determines where the submission is filed for assessment. Results: Since its inception, the cco framework has identified 17 funding gaps in 9 cancer sites. In 4 prioritizations, the framework supported 6 submissions. As of June 2018, the framework had contributed to the eventual funding of more than 9 new drug-indication pairs, with more awaiting funding consideration. Conclusions: The cco prioritization framework has enabled clinicians to effectively and systematically identify, prioritize, and fill funding gaps not addressed by industry. Ultimately, the framework helps to ensure that patients can access evidence-informed and cost-effective therapies. The framework will continue to evolve as it encounters new challenges, including funding requests for rare indications.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/economics , Oncologists/organization & administration , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Financing, Organized , Humans , Neoplasms/economics , Ontario
5.
IUCrJ ; 5(Pt 6): 681-698, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30443353

ABSTRACT

Hexaferrites are an important class of magnetic oxides with applications in data storage and electronics. Their crystal structures are highly modular, consisting of Fe- or Ba-rich close-packed blocks that can be stacked in different sequences to form a multitude of unique structures, producing large anisotropic unit cells with lattice parameters typically >100 Šalong the stacking axis. This has limited atomic-resolution structure solutions to relatively simple examples such as Ba2Zn2Fe12O22, whilst longer stacking sequences have been modelled only in terms of block sequences, with no refinement of individual atomic coordinates or occupancies. This paper describes the growth of a series of complex hexaferrite crystals, their atomic-level structure solution by high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction and imaging methods, and their physical characterization by magnetometry. The structures include a new hexaferrite stacking sequence, with the longest lattice parameter of any hexaferrite with a fully determined structure.

6.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 30(10): 658-666, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30007803

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We investigated the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and the appropriate timing, dose and schedule of treatment for patients with ES-SCLC or limited stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care and by the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group through a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: In patients with LS-SCLC (stage I, II and III), the addition of thoracic radiotherapy to standard chemotherapy is recommended. However, there is no clear evidence to inform definitive recommendations for optimal timing, sequential versus concurrent therapies and optimal dose or regimen. In patients with LS-SCLC, etoposide-cisplatin is the preferred regimen for adults who are being treated with combined modality therapy with curative intent. In patients with ES-SCLC (stage IV), there is insufficient evidence to recommend the addition of thoracic radiotherapy to standard chemotherapy as a standard practice for survival benefit; however, it could be considered on a case-by-case basis to reduce local recurrence. In patients with ES-SCLC, a platinum agent plus etoposide is the preferred regimen for adult patients who are being treated with combined modality therapy. Cisplatin and irinotecan represents an alternative treatment option to this, but is associated with increased rates of adverse events such as diarrhoea.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Humans , Irinotecan/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
7.
Faraday Discuss ; 211(0): 117-131, 2018 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30033457

ABSTRACT

Computationally led materials discovery requires efficient methods to generate either exact or approximate crystal structures that span the composition range of a chosen phase space. Here we present a new tool, the Flexible Unit Structure Engine (FUSE), for the generation of approximate 'probe structures' to predict regions of composition space where compounds can be experimentally realised. We then test FUSE by applying it to 42 compositions in the Y3+-Sr2+-Ti4+-O2- phase field. FUSE correctly identifies all of the target compounds in the regions of stability and identifies the exact crystal structure for 8 out of the 10 compositions.

8.
Dis Esophagus ; 31(12)2018 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29905764

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer and its treatment can cause serious morbidity/toxicity. These effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) can be measured using disease-specific scales such as FACT-E, generic scales such as EQ-5D-3L, or through symptoms. In a two-year cross-sectional study, we compared HRQOL across esophageal cancer patients treated in an ambulatory clinic and across multiple disease states, among patients with all stages of esophageal cancer. Consenting patients completed FACT-E, EQ-5D, a visual analog scale, and patient reported (PR)-ECOG. Symptom complexes were constructed from FACT-E domains. Responses were categorized by disease state: pre-, during, and post-treatment, surveillance, progression, and palliative chemotherapy. Spearman correlation and multivariable linear regression characterized these associations. In total, 199 patients completed 317 questionnaires. Mean FACT-E and subscale scores dropped from baseline through treatment and recovered during post-treatment surveillance (P < 0.001); EQ-5D health utility scores (HUS) displayed a similar pattern but with smaller differences (P = 0.07), and with evidence of ceiling effect. Among patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer, mean EQ-5D HUS varied across disease states (P < 0.001), along with FACT-E and subscales (P < 0.001). Among patients with advanced disease, there was no significant difference between baseline and on-treatment total scores, but improved esophageal cancer-specific scales were noted (P = 0.003). Strong correlation was observed between EQ-5D and FACT-E (R = 0.73), along with physical and functional subscales. In addition, the association between FACT-E and EQ-5D HUS was maintained in a multivariable model (P < 0.001). We interpret these results to suggest that in a real-world clinic setting, FACT-E, EQ-5D HUS, and symptoms were strongly correlated. Most HRQOL and symptom parameters suggested that patients had worse HRQOL and symptoms during curative therapy, but recovered well afterwards. In contrast, palliative chemotherapy had a neutral to positive impact on HRQOL/symptoms when compared to their baseline pre-treatment state.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Health Status , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Phys Rev Lett ; 120(7): 076101, 2018 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29542979

ABSTRACT

Highly corrugated, stepped surfaces present regular 1D arrays of binding sites, creating a complex, heterogeneous environment to water. Rather than decorating the hydrophilic step sites to form 1D chains, water on stepped Cu(511) forms an extended 2D network that binds strongly to the steps but bridges across the intervening hydrophobic Cu(100) terraces. The hydrogen-bonded network contains pentamer, hexamer, and octomer water rings that leave a third of the stable Cu step sites unoccupied in order to bind water H down close to the step dipole and complete three hydrogen bonds per molecule.

10.
Curr Oncol ; 25(6): 366-370, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607110

ABSTRACT

Background: We aimed to assess current treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients with localized gastric and esophageal (ge) cancers. Methods: This retrospective analysis considered patients 75 years of age or older with ge cancers treated during 2012-2014. Patient demographics and tumour characteristics were collected. Overall survival (os) and disease-free survival were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demographics. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors affecting treatment choices. Results: The 110 patients in the study cohort had a median age of 81 years (range: 75-99 years). Primary disease sites were esophageal (55%) and gastric (45%). Treatment received included radiation therapy alone (29%), surgery alone (26%), surgery plus perioperative therapy (14%), chemoradiation alone (10%), and supportive care alone (14%). In multivariable analyses, surgery (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02) was the only independent predictor for improved os. Patients with a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.008), gastric disease site (p = 0.02), and adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.01) were more likely to undergo surgery. Conclusions: At our institution, few patients 75 years of age and older received multimodality therapy for localized ge cancers. Outcomes were better for patients who underwent surgery than for those who did not. To ensure optimal treatment selection, comprehensive geriatric assessment should be considered for patients 75 years of age and older with localized ge cancers.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
11.
Nature ; 546(7657): 280-284, 2017 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593963

ABSTRACT

The discovery of new materials is hampered by the lack of efficient approaches to the exploration of both the large number of possible elemental compositions for such materials, and of the candidate structures at each composition. For example, the discovery of inorganic extended solid structures has relied on knowledge of crystal chemistry coupled with time-consuming materials synthesis with systematically varied elemental ratios. Computational methods have been developed to guide synthesis by predicting structures at specific compositions and predicting compositions for known crystal structures, with notable successes. However, the challenge of finding qualitatively new, experimentally realizable compounds, with crystal structures where the unit cell and the atom positions within it differ from known structures, remains for compositionally complex systems. Many valuable properties arise from substitution into known crystal structures, but materials discovery using this approach alone risks both missing best-in-class performance and attempting design with incomplete knowledge. Here we report the experimental discovery of two structure types by computational identification of the region of a complex inorganic phase field that contains them. This is achieved by computing probe structures that capture the chemical and structural diversity of the system and whose energies can be ranked against combinations of currently known materials. Subsequent experimental exploration of the lowest-energy regions of the computed phase diagram affords two materials with previously unreported crystal structures featuring unusual structural motifs. This approach will accelerate the systematic discovery of new materials in complex compositional spaces by efficiently guiding synthesis and enhancing the predictive power of the computational tools through expansion of the knowledge base underpinning them.

12.
Lung Cancer ; 109: 117-123, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend pathologic mediastinal staging and surgical resection for patients with clinically node-negative T1/T2 small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the extent to which surgery is used is unknown. We sought to assess trends and practice patterns in the use of surgery for SCLC. METHODS: T1 or T2N0M0 SCLC cases were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), 2004-2013. Characteristics of patients undergoing resection were analyzed. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify individual and hospital-level predictors of receipt of surgery, adjusting for clinical, demographic and facility characteristics. Trends in resection rates were analyzed over the study period. FINDINGS: 9740 patients were identified with clinical T1 or T2 N0M0 SCLC. Of these, 2210 underwent surgery (22.7%), with 1421 (64.3%) undergoing lobectomy, 739 (33.4%) sublobar resections and 50 (2.3%) pneumonectomies. After adjustment, Medicaid patients were less likely to receive surgery (OR0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.89, p=0.006), as were those with T2 tumors (OR0.25 CI0.22-0.29, p<0.0001). Academic facilities were more likely to resect eligible patients (OR 1.90 CI1.45-2.49, p<0.0001). Between 2004 and 2013, resection rates more than doubled from 9.1% to 21.7%. Overall, 68.7% of patients were not offered surgery despite having no identifiable contraindication. In patients not receiving surgery, only 7% underwent pathologic mediastinal staging. INTERPRETATION: Rates of resection are increasing, but two thirds of potentially eligible patients fail to undergo surgery. Further study is required to address the lack of concordance between guidelines and practice.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pneumonectomy/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Carcinoma, Small Cell/surgery , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Medicaid , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
13.
Lung Cancer ; 109: 78-88, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577955

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of surgery in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. Survival outcomes for resection of stage I-IIIA SCLC compared to chemotherapy-based non-surgical treatment (NST) were examined using propensity matching. METHODS: 29,994 clinical stage I-IIIA SCLC patients, including 2,619 undergoing surgery, were identified in the National Cancer Database. Stage-specific propensity scores for receipt of surgery were created. Resected patients were matched 1:1 to those undergoing NST. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models. A separate match was performed comparing Stage I/II patients aged <85 with a Charlson score of 0 who underwent lobectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy (and radiotherapy if node positive) to those treated with multiagent chemotherapy and concurrent chest radiotherapy (CRT) of at least 40 gray. RESULTS: 2,089 patients were matched, and cohorts were well balanced. Surgery was associated with longer survival for Stage I (median OS 38.6 months vs. 22.9 months, HR 0.62 95%CI 0.57-0.69, p<0.0001), but survival differences were attenuated for Stage II (median OS 23.4 months vs. 20.7 months, HR 0.84 95%CI 0.70-1.01, p=0.06) and IIIA (median OS 21.7 vs. 16.0 months, HR 0.71 95%CI 0.60-0.83, p <0.0001). In analyses by T and N stage, longer OS was observed in resected patients with stage T3/T4 N0 (median OS 33.0 vs. 16.8 months, p=0.008) and node positivity(N1+ 24.4 vs. 18.3 months p=0.03; N2+ 20.1 vs. 14.6 months p=0.007). In the subgroup analysis, 507 stage I/II patients receiving lobectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were matched to patients receiving concurrent CRT. In this cohort, lobectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer survival (median OS 48.6 vs. 28.7 months, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is associated with significantly longer survival for early SCLC. New randomized trials should assess trimodality therapy in stages I/II, and in node negative disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Pneumonectomy , Aged , Carcinoma, Small Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Cohort Studies , Drug Therapy , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Propensity Score , Radiotherapy , Survival Analysis
14.
Phys Chem Chem Phys ; 19(11): 7617-7623, 2017 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28252144

ABSTRACT

Local or global ordering of chiral molecules at a surface is a key step in both chiral separation and heterogeneous enantioselective catalysis. Using density functional theory and scanning probe microscopy results, we find that the accepted structural model for the well known bitartrate on Cu(110) chiral system cannot account for the chiral segregation observed. Instead, we show that this strongly bound, chiral adsorbate changes its adsorption footprint in response to the local environment. The flexible adsorption geometry allows bitartrate to form stable homochiral trimer chains in which the central molecule restructures from a rectangular to an oblique footprint, breaking its internal hydrogen bonds in order to form strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds to neighbouring adsorbates. Racemic structures containing mixed enantiomers do not form strong hydrogen bonds, providing the thermodynamic driving force for the chiral separation that is observed experimentally. This result shows the importance of considering the dynamical response of molecular adsorption footprints at the surface in directing chiral assembly and segregation. The ability of strongly-chemisorbed enantiomers to change footprint depending on the local adsorption environment indicates that supramolecular assemblies at surfaces may exhibit more complex dynamical behaviour than hitherto suspected, which, ultimately, could be tailored to lead to environment and stimuli-responsive chiral surfaces.

15.
Dis Esophagus ; 30(2): 1-7, 2017 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26822871

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may lead to Barrett's esophagus (BE). Previously, a large genome-wide association study found two germline markers to be associated with BE, FOXF1 rs9936833 (C allele) and MHC rs9257809 (A allele). This study evaluated whether these two polymorphisms are associated with gastroesphageal acid reflux as measured by 24-hour pH testing. Patients with acid reflux symptoms referred for esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring at University Health Network (Toronto, ON) were enrolled. DNA extracted from blood was genotyped using a Taqman Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay. DeMeester scores of ≥14.7 or prior evidence of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy defined individuals with esophageal acid reflux. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for clinical risk factors, was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for each polymorphism in relation to the presence of acid reflux. Of 182 patients, the median age was 50 years and 62% were female; 95 (52%) met the definition of GERD. In the multivariable analysis, both FOXF1 rs9936833 (OR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.12-2.96; P = 0.02) and MHC rs9257809 (OR = 9.36; 95%CI: 2.92-29.99; P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with presence of acid reflux. When both polymorphisms were placed in the same model, the adjusted ORs were 2.10 (95%CI: 1.24-3.53; P = 0.005) and 10.95 (95%CI: 3.32-36.09; P < 0.001), respectively. The association for risk allele C in FOXF1 rs9936833 and risk allele A in MHC rs9257809 with the presence of acid reflux suggests a potential pathophysiologic mechanism for the role of genetic influences in BE development.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/blood , Gastroesophageal Reflux/genetics , HLA-C Antigens/blood , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Adult , Alleles , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/blood , Genetic Markers , Genotype , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
16.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(7): 724-733, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27731547

ABSTRACT

We report data-simple descriptions of patient characteristics, cancer categories, and non-risk-adjusted survival-for patients with pathologically staged cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction after resection or ablation with no preoperative therapy from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC). Thirty-three institutions from six continents submitted de-identified data using standard definitions: demographics, comorbidities, clinical cancer categories, and all-cause mortality from first management decision. Of 13,300 patients, 5,631 had squamous cell carcinoma, 7,558 adenocarcinoma, 85 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 26 undifferentiated carcinoma. Patients were older (62 years) men (80%) with normal body mass index (51%), little weight loss (1.8 kg), 0-2 ECOG performance status (83%), and a history of smoking (70%). Cancers were pT1 (24%), pT2 (15%), pT3 (50%), pN0 (52%), pM0 (93%), and pG2-G3 (78%); most involved distal esophagus (71%). Non-risk-adjusted survival for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was monotonic and distinctive across pTNM. Survival was more distinctive for adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma when pT was ordered by pN. Survival for pTis-1 adenocarcinoma was better than for squamous cell carcinoma, although monotonic and distinctive for both. WECC pathologic staging data is improved over that of the 7th edition, with more patients studied and patient and cancer variables collected. These data will be the basis for the 8th edition cancer staging manuals following risk adjustment for patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics, and should direct 9th edition data collection. However, the role of pure pathologic staging as the principal point of reference for esophageal cancer staging is waning.


Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques/mortality , Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy/mortality , Neoplasm Staging/mortality , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Female , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods
17.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(7): 707-714, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27731549

ABSTRACT

To address uncertainty of whether clinical stage groupings (cTNM) for esophageal cancer share prognostic implications with pathologic groupings after esophagectomy alone (pTNM), we report data-simple descriptions of patient characteristics, cancer categories, and non-risk-adjusted survival-for clinically staged patients from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC). Thirty-three institutions from six continents submitted data using variables with standard definitions: demographics, comorbidities, clinical cancer categories, and all-cause mortality from first management decision. Of 22,123 clinically staged patients, 8,156 had squamous cell carcinoma, 13,814 adenocarcinoma, 116 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 37 undifferentiated carcinoma. Patients were older (62 years) men (80%) with normal body mass index (18.5-25 mg/kg2 , 47%), little weight loss (2.4 ± 7.8 kg), 0-1 ECOG performance status (67%), and history of smoking (67%). Cancers were cT1 (12%), cT2 (22%), cT3 (56%), cN0 (44%), cM0 (95%), and cG2-G3 (89%); most involved the distal esophagus (73%). Non-risk-adjusted survival for squamous cell carcinoma was not distinctive for early cT or cN; for adenocarcinoma, it was distinctive for early versus advanced cT and for cN0 versus cN+. Patients with early cancers had worse survival and those with advanced cancers better survival than expected from equivalent pathologic categories based on prior WECC pathologic data. Thus, clinical and pathologic categories do not share prognostic implications. This makes clinically based treatment decisions difficult and pre-treatment prognostication inaccurate. These data will be the basis for the 8th edition cancer staging manuals following risk adjustment for patient characteristics, cancer categories, and treatment characteristics and should direct 9th edition data collection.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/mortality , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/mortality , Female , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods
18.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(7): 715-723, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27731548

ABSTRACT

To address uncertainty of whether pathologic stage groupings after neoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) for esophageal cancer share prognostic implications with pathologic groupings after esophagectomy alone (pTNM), we report data-simple descriptions of patient characteristics, cancer categories, and non-risk-adjusted survival-for pathologically staged cancers after neoadjuvant therapy from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC). Thirty-three institutions from six continents submitted data using variables with standard definitions: demographics, comorbidities, clinical cancer categories, and all-cause mortality from first management decision. Of 7,773 pathologically staged neoadjuvant patients, 2,045 had squamous cell carcinoma, 5,686 adenocarcinoma, 31 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 11 undifferentiated carcinoma. Patients were older (61 years) men (83%) with normal (40%) or overweight (35%) body mass index, 0-1 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (96%), and a history of smoking (69%). Cancers were ypT0 (20%), ypT1 (13%), ypT2 (18%), ypT3 (44%), ypN0 (55%), ypM0 (94%), and G2-G3 (72%); most involved the distal esophagus (80%). Non-risk-adjusted survival for yp categories was unequally depressed, more for earlier categories than later, compared with equivalent categories from prior WECC data for esophagectomy-alone patients. Thus, survival of patients with ypT0-2N0M0 cancers was intermediate and similar regardless of ypT; survival for ypN+ cancers was poor. Because prognoses for ypTNM and pTNM categories are dissimilar, prognostication should be based on separate ypTNM categories and groupings. These data will be the basis for the 8th edition cancer staging manuals following risk adjustment for patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics and should direct 9th edition data collection.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/mortality , Neoplasm Staging/mortality , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods
19.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(8): 1152-1158, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26663741

ABSTRACT

The prognosis for locally advanced esophageal cancer is poor despite the use of trimodality therapy. In this phase II study, we report the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant sunitinib. Included were patients with stage IIa, IIB or III cancer of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Neoadjuvant therapy involved Irinotecan (65 mg/m2 ) + Cisplatin (30 mg/m2 ) on weeks 1 and 2, 4 and 5, 7 and 8 with concurrent radiation (50Gy/25 fractions) on weeks 4-8. Sunitinib was commenced 4-13 weeks after surgery and continued for one year. Sixty-one patients were included in the final analysis, 36 patients commenced adjuvant sunitinib. Fourteen patients discontinued sunitinib due to disease recurrence (39%) within the 12-month period, 12 (33%) discontinued due to toxicity, and 3 (8%) requested cessation of therapy. In the overall population, median survival was 26 months with a 2 and 3-year survival rate of 52% and 35%, respectively. The median survival for the 36 patients treated with sunitinib was 35 months and 2-year survival probability of 68%. In a historical control, a prior phase II study with the same trimodality therapy (n = 43), median survival was 36 months, with a 2-year survival of 67%. Initiation of adjuvant sunitinib is feasible, but poorly tolerated, with no signal of additional benefit over trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Indoles/administration & dosage , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Indoles/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Period , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Sunitinib , Survival Rate , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data
20.
Dis Esophagus ; 29(5): 472-8, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809620

ABSTRACT

This prospective population-based study was designed to evaluate treatment choices in patients with new manometrically diagnosed achalasia and their outcomes. Patients referred to the esophageal function laboratory were enrolled after a new manometric diagnosis of achalasia. Patients completed an initial achalasia symptom score validated questionnaire on their symptom severity, duration, treatment pre-diagnosis and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) survey. Treatment decisions were made by the referring physician and the patient. Follow-up questionnaires were completed every 3 months for 1 year. Patients who chose not to undergo treatment at 1-year follow-up completed another questionnaire after 5 years. Between January 2004 and January 2005, 83 of 124 eligible patients were enrolled. Heller myotomy was performed on 31 patients, three patients received botulinum toxin injections, and 25 patients received 29 pneumatic balloon dilatations. Twenty-four patients chose to receive no treatment. Following treatment, patients treated with surgery, dilatation and botulinum toxin had an average improvement in achalasia symptom score of 23 +/- 12.2, 17 +/- 10.9, and 9 +/- 14, respectively. Patients receiving no treatment had worsening symptoms with a symptom score change of -3.5 +/- 11.4. Surgery and dilatation resulted in significant improvement (P < 0.01) relative to no treatment. In univariate logistic regression, symptom severity score (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.08), sphincter tone (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09), difficulty swallowing liquids (OR 3.21, 95% 1.15 to 8.99), waking from sleep (OR 2.75, 95% 1.00 to 7.61), and weight loss (OR 5.99, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.58) were all significant in predicting that patients would select treatment. In the multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) and weight loss (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.02 to 15.2) were statistically significant for undergoing treatment. At 5 years, five (21%) of those who had initially declined treatment at 1 year ultimately chose a treatment. Patients who finally chose Heller myotomy had lower mental component dimension scores on the SF-36 at 1 year than those who did not. This study shows that almost one third of patients with manometrically diagnosed achalasia choose not to undergo treatment within 1 year of their diagnosis. Patients who are more symptomatic appear to be more likely to undergo treatment by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, increasing age and weight loss are predictive of those who will undergo treatment, with weight loss having the greatest influence. Patients who choose not to undergo treatment make lifestyle changes to maintain their quality of life, and only a minority of them ultimately undergo treatment.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/therapy , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neurotoxins/administration & dosage , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...