ABSTRACT
In sustaining the soil quality, soil salinization has become a major challenge due to the increasing salinity rate of 10% annually. Despite, the serious concerns, the influence of soil amendments on microbial communities and its related attributes have limited findings. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the potential of three various biochars, digestate (DI), and its compost (COM) in reclamation of saline soil under closed ecosystem. The decrease in the pH was displayed by lignite char, and electrical conductivity by lignite char plus COM addition among all the treatments. The subside in Na +, with a significant rise in K +, was exhibited in soils amended with DI plus DI biochar as a combined ameliorate over control. The negative priming effects on native soil organic carbon (nSOC) due to the decreased substrate bioavailability, in corn straw and DI biochars ameliorates were noted. The urease and alkaline phosphatase activity were pronounced higher in COM. However, the catalase and fluorescein diacetate activity were greater in lignite char plus DI and COM respectively. The co-addition of biochar and organic substrates shifted microbial community, is in correspondence with the relative abundance of the phylum. Overall, the abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was higher in soils under a combination of lignite char with DI and COM respectively. Likely, the abundance of Euryarchaeota was dominant in the co-application of corn straw biochar and DI. Redundancy analysis revealed the intactness between bacterial genera and their metabolisms with K +, and Mg 2+. PICRUSt disclosed the enhanced metabolic functions in soil with amalgam of DI and its biochar. The findings showed that the application of DI and its biochar mixture, as an amendment could be a better approach in the long-term reclamation of saline soil.
Subject(s)
Microbiota , Soil , Carbon , Charcoal , Soil MicrobiologyABSTRACT
Amplification and sequencing of 16S amplicons are widely used for profiling the structure of oral microbiota. However, it remains not clear whether and to what degree DNA extraction and targeted 16S rRNA hypervariable regions influence the analysis. Based on a mock community consisting of five oral bacterial species in equal abundance, we compared the 16S amplicon sequencing results on the Illumina MiSeq platform from six frequently employed DNA extraction procedures and three pairs of widely used 16S rRNA hypervariable primers targeting different 16S rRNA regions. Technical reproducibility of selected 16S regions was also assessed. DNA extraction method exerted considerable influence on the observed bacterial diversity while hypervariable regions had a relatively minor effect. Protocols with beads added to the enzyme-mediated DNA extraction reaction produced more accurate bacterial community structure than those without either beads or enzymes. Hypervariable regions targeting V3-V4 and V4-V5 seemed to produce more reproducible results than V1-V3. Neither sequencing batch nor change of operator affected the reproducibility of bacterial diversity profiles. Therefore, DNA extraction strategy and 16S rDNA hypervariable regions both influenced the results of oral microbiota biodiversity profiling, thus should be carefully considered in study design and data interpretation.
