Analysis of Sociodemographic Factors Affecting Ambulatory Surgical Center Discharge Patterns for Endometrial Cancer Hysterectomies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Investigate outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIHs) performed for endometrial cancer at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). DESIGN: Our study aimed to explore the feasibility and discharge outcomes for MIHs for endometrial cancer in an ASC setting by using same-day discharge data. SETTING: The prevalence of MIH for endometrial cancer between 2016 and 2019 was estimated from the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent MIHs for endometrial cancer at an ASC were included. INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS MAIN RESULTS: Weighted estimates of prevalence and association between discharge status and sociodemographic factors were explored. Same-day discharge was defined as discharge on the day of surgery, and delayed discharge was defined as discharge after the day of surgery. An estimated 95 041 MIHs for endometrial cancer were performed at ASCs between 2016 and 2019. Notably, 91.9% (n = 87 372) resulted in same-day discharge, 1.2% (n = 1121) had delayed discharge, and 6.9% (n = 6548) had missing discharge information; 78.7% procedures (n = 68 812) were performed at public hospitals. The proportion of delayed discharges were lower in private, not-for profit ASCs (0.8%, p = .03) than public hospitals. Patients who had delayed discharges on average were older (69.7 vs 62.4 years, p <.001), more likely to have comorbid conditions including diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.75) and overweight or obese body mass indices (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.39), and more likely to have public insurance (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.40-2.25). CONCLUSION: MIHs for endometrial cancer are feasible in an ASC. Optimal candidates for receipt of MIHs for endometrial cancer at an ASC are patients who are younger and have less comorbidities, lower body mass index, and private insurance.

Human papillomavirus vaccination receipt and provider counseling rates among high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: We describe provider documented counseling patterns and perception regarding HPV vaccination among patients with a history of cervical dysplasia. METHODS: All patients ages 21-45 who underwent colposcopy at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2020were sent a self-administered survey through the electronic medical record patient portal to assess their attitudes regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Demographic information, HPV vaccination history, and documented obstetrics and gynecology provider counseling at the time of colposcopy were examined. RESULTS: Of 1465patients, 434 (29.6 %) reported or had documented receipt of at least one dose of the human papillomavirus vaccine. The remainder reported they were not vaccinated or had no documentation of vaccination. Proportion of vaccinated patients was higher among White compared to Black and Asian patients (P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, private insurance (aOR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.4-3.7) was associated with vaccinated status while Asian race (aOR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-0.7) and hypertension (aOR 0.2, 95 % CI 0.08-0.7) were less likely to be associated with vaccination status. Among patients with unvaccinated or unknown vaccination status, 112 (10.8 %) received documented counseling regardingcatch-up human papillomavirus vaccination at a gynecologic visit. Patients seen by a sub-specialist obstetrics and gynecologic provider were more likely to have documented provider counseling regarding vaccination compared to those seen by a generalist obstetric/gynecologist provider (26 % vs 9.8 %, p < 0.001). Patients cited lack of physician discussion (53.7 %) and the belief that they were too old to receive the HPV vaccine (48.8 %) as the main reasons for remaining unvaccinated. CONCLUSION: HPV vaccination and the rate of obstetric and gynecologic provider counseling regarding HPV vaccination among patients undergoing colposcopy remains low. When surveyed, many patients with a history of colposcopy cited provider recommendation as afactor in their decision to undergo adjuvant HPV vaccination, demonstrating the importance of provider counseling in thisgroup.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Screening and Referral Outcomes among Transgender Patients in a Primary Care Setting.

Transgender patients are at elevated risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), but national guidelines do not recommend routine screening for this population. This paper explores the feasibility and effectiveness of routine IPV screening of transgender patients in a primary care setting by describing an existing screening program and identifying factors associated with referral and engagement in IPV-related care for transgender patients. An IPV "referral cascade" was created for 1,947 transgender primary care patients at an urban community health center who were screened for IPV between January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2016: (a) Of those screening positive, how many were referred? (b) Of those referred, how many engaged in IPV-specific care within 3 months? Logistic regression identified demographic correlates of referral and engagement. Of the 1,947 transgender patients screened for IPV, 227 screened positive. 110/227 (48.5%) were referred to either internal or external IPV-related services. Of those referred to on-site services, 65/103 (63.1%) had an IPV-related appointment within 3 months of a positive screen. IPV referral was associated with being assigned male at birth (AMAB) versus assigned female at birth (AFAB) (AOR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.52, 4.75) and with nonbinary, rather than binary, gender identity (AOR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.09, 3.73). Engagement in IPV-related services was not associated with any measured demographic characteristics. Similar to published rates for cisgender women, half of transgender patients with positive IPV screens received referrals and two-thirds of those referred engaged in IPV-specific care. These findings support routine IPV screening and referral for transgender patients in primary care settings. Provider training should focus on how to ensure referrals are made for all transgender patients who screen positive for IPV, regardless of gender identity, to ensure the benefits of screening accrue equally for all patients.

Use of postpartum contraception during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how use of postpartum contraception (PPC) changed during the COVID-19 public health emergency. METHODS: Billing and coding data from a single urban institution (n = 1797) were used to compare use of PPC in patients who delivered from March to June 2020 (COVID Cohort, n = 927) and from March to June 2019 (Comparison Cohort, n = 895). χ2 and multivariable logistic regression models assessed relationships between cohorts, use of contraception, and interactions with postpartum visits and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: In the COVID Cohort, 585 women (64%) attended postpartum visits (n = 488, 83.4%, via telemedicine) compared to 660 (74.7%, in-person) in the Comparison Cohort (P < 0.01). Total use of PPC remained similar: 30.4% (n = 261) in the COVID Cohort and 29.6% (n = 278) in the Comparison Cohort (P = 0.69). Compared to in-person visits in the Comparison Cohort, telemedicine visits in the COVID Cohort had similar odds of insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.6), but higher odds of inpatient insertion (aOR 6.4, 95% CI 1.7-24.9). Black patients compared to white patients were more likely to initiate inpatient LARC (aOR 7.29, 95% CI 1.81-29.4) compared to the Comparison Cohort (aOR 3.63, 95% CI 0.29-46.19). CONCLUSION: Use of PPC remained similar during COVID-19 with a decrease of in-person postpartum visits, new adoption of postpartum telemedicine visits, and an increase in inpatient insertion of LARC with higher odds of inpatient placement among black patients.